WhatsApp Embedded in Routine Service Delivery for Smoking Cessation
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Recently, the use of communication technologies and social media applications has become increasingly widespread to strengthen efforts for smoking cessation. The purpose of this study is; to assess the effect on success rate of the WhatsApp application which is embedded in the smoking cessation policlinic service delivery. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled intervention study was conducted with 132 volunteers who were followed up at the EUTF Smoking Cessation Policlinic between March-July 2017. The intervention content based on transtheoretic model was prepared and 60 WhatsApp messages were delivered to participants for 3 months of follow up. For data collection, initial interview form and follow up form consisting sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status, medical condition and treatment, were used. The success rate at first and third months were assessed by the point-prevalence regarding the previous week. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. For secondary outcomes; number of follow-ups, change in weight and continuity of medication were evaluated. Findings: Success rate in the first month was 65.9% for intervention group and 40.9% in the control group; for the third month it was 50.0% in the intervention group and 30.7% in the control group. Being in the intervention group increased the success rate by 3,50 (1,30-9,44) times in the first month and 2,50 (1,08-6,40) times in the third month. The intervention was the only parameter effective in the two follow-up periods; the difference in success rate caused by gender, marital status and work-related social class has been eliminated after adjustment for the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2018
CompletedSeptember 17, 2026
September 1, 2026
3 months
September 4, 2018
September 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quitting success rates at the end of the 1st, 3rd and 6th month
Quitting success rates at the end of the 1st, 3rd and 6th month of follow-up in the intervention and control groups. Quitting success rate at 1st month was calculated with point prevalence. History of cessation was based on self report and those who declared not smoked even a single puff on a cigarette at all in the past two weeks were considered as "successful" in the quitting attempt (19). The success rate at 3rd month was calculated with point prevalence. In this point, not smoking at all in total in the past ten weeks was considered "successful" in the quitting attempt. The success rate at 6th month was calculated with point prevalence. In this point, not smoking at all in total in the past 24 weeks was considered "successful" in the quitting attempt. A decrease in success rates at six months is expected in comparison with 3 months as the intervention lasts for 3 months.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The total number of follow-ups
3 months
The continuity to drug,
3 months
Self reported difference in weight in kilograms since the first contact
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Receiving WhatsApp messages
EXPERIMENTALAmong patients applying to the smoking cessation outpatient clinic between March and October 2017, \>18-year old volunteers who smoked at least one cigarette/day, using WhatsApp at least on four days of the week, accepting the 3-month follow-up were included In receiving WhatsApp messages group.
Not receiving WhatsApp messages
NO INTERVENTIONIn "not receiving WhatsApp messages" group; Stratification and randomization were both used to randomly allocate participants to both arms of the study. The intervention and control groups were first stratified according to physician and then gender, and later allocated in a simple random manner. Randomization was conducted using a computer spreadsheet. Allocation according to gender was conducted regarding the 2:3 female to male ratio in the routine cessation services and stratification according to physician aimed to have a balanced distribution among the different physicians working in the same cessation unit. As the target number of participants was small, further stratification was not applied. Simple random sampling was then used to allocate participants to each group.
Interventions
The routine service delivery was ongoing as the intervention was conducted. In addition to the routine procedures in service delivery described above, WhatsApp messages were sent according to the plan.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Among patients applying to the smoking cessation outpatient clinic between March and October 2017,
- \>18-year old volunteers who smoked at least one cigarette/day,
- using WhatsApp at least on four days of the week,
- accepting the 3-month follow-up were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- people who were not 'ready to quit' according to the TTM stages of change evaluation
- who had already quit before applying to the clinic were excluded.
- If two or more patients were living in the same house or had applied to the clinic together, only the first of these was included and the rest were excluded from the study, as they could show the arriving messages to their friend/ partner/ relative.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ege University Faculty of Medicine Public Health Departmant
Izmir, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Filozof C, Fernandez Pinilla MC, Fernandez-Cruz A. Smoking cessation and weight gain. Obes Rev. 2004 May;5(2):95-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00131.x.
PMID: 15086863BACKGROUNDMunoz RF, Chen K, Bunge EL, Bravin JI, Shaughnessy EA, Perez-Stable EJ. Reaching Spanish-speaking smokers online: a 10-year worldwide research program. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 May-Jun;35(5-6):407-14.
PMID: 25211569BACKGROUNDProchaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
PMID: 10170434BACKGROUNDCheung YT, Chan CH, Lai CK, Chan WF, Wang MP, Li HC, Chan SS, Lam TH. Using WhatsApp and Facebook Online Social Groups for Smoking Relapse Prevention for Recent Quitters: A Pilot Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 22;17(10):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4829.
PMID: 26494159BACKGROUNDWhittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 10;4(4):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
PMID: 27060875BACKGROUNDCarlson LE, Goodey E, Bennett MH, Taenzer P, Koopmans J. The addition of social support to a community-based large-group behavioral smoking cessation intervention: improved cessation rates and gender differences. Addict Behav. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):547-59. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00192-7.
PMID: 12188591BACKGROUNDTurner J, McNeill A, Coleman T, Bee JL, Agboola S. Feasibility of offering nicotine replacement therapy as a relapse prevention treatment in routine smoking cessation services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 1;13:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-38.
PMID: 23375024BACKGROUNDDurmaz S, Ergin I, Durusoy R, Hassoy H, Caliskan A, Okyay P. WhatsApp embedded in routine service delivery for smoking cessation: effects on abstinence rates in a randomized controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6727-z.
PMID: 30961557DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The study was designed as a single-blind study. The physicians (except the first author) were blind to the allocation to intervention or control groups and they conducted their routine smoking cessation counseling work. As long as the patient did not comment on the messages, the physicians were blind throughout the follow ups as well. After the first routine counseling, participants were informed by the first author about the study, thus they were not blind to the intervention. The analysis of the study was conducted by the first author who was not blind to the intervention/ control status of the participants. The first author could not be blind as he was to send out the WhatssApp messages. However, contact numbers of the participants were labeled with numbers (I-01 to I-44) to secure anonymity and to prevent any bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD MD, research asistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2018
First Posted
October 22, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share