NCT03709394

Brief Summary

This study evaluates two different techniques for ultrasound guided peripheral venous catheter insertion in pre-hospital emergency care in comparison with conventional approach without any ultrasound guidance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 17, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasoundperipheral venous catheter

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Frequency of the patients with successful the first cannulation attempt of peripheral venous catheter insertion

    Frequency of the patients in which only one cannulation attempt was necessary

    60 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Frequency of the patients with successful peripheral venous catheter insertion irrespective of the number of attempts

    60 minutes

  • The number of attempts required for successful peripheral venous catheter insertion

    60 minutes

  • Time required to introduce peripheral venous catheter

    60 minutes

Study Arms (3)

Group A: Full utrasound guidance

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Full utrasound guidance of cathether insertion. Intervention: Ultrasound portable device used for the identification of the target vein and for the ultrasound control of proper catheter placement during the procedure of peripheral venous cannula insertion.

Procedure: Full utrasound guidance

Group B: Partial ultrasound guidance

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Catheter insertion under partial ultrasound guidance. Intervention: Ultrasound portable device used only for the identification of the target vein, the catheter placement will be done by conventional approach.

Procedure: Partial ultrasound guidance

Group C: No ultrasound guidance

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Catheter insertion by conventional approach, without ultrasound guidance

Procedure: No ultrasound guidance

Interventions

The target vein is directly identified by portable ultrasound device and the complete procedure of peripheral venous cathether insertion is controlled by ultrasound guidance in real time

Group A: Full utrasound guidance

The target vein is directly identified by ultrasound but the procedure of peripheral venous cathether insertion is performed conventionally, without ultrasound guidance

Group B: Partial ultrasound guidance

The target vein is identified and peripheral venous catheter is inserted by conventional approach without use of any guiding devices

Group C: No ultrasound guidance

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Awake patient indicated for peripheral venous catheter placement while treated by emergency medical service

You may not qualify if:

  • Coma
  • Age \<18 years
  • Patient disagreement with the insertion of peripheral venous catheter
  • Contraindication of ultrasound examination of the venous system
  • Contraindication of the introduction of peripheral venous cannula on both upper limbs
  • Investigator's opinion that ultrasonic control cannulation would cause undue delay and a other procedure is required

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region

Beroun, Central Bohemia, Czechia

Location

Study Officials

  • Roman Skulec, MD, PhD

    Emergency Medical Service of Central Bohemian Region, Kladno, Czech republic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective randomized study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head physician for science and research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Posted

October 17, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

May 31, 2018

Study Completion

March 31, 2019

Last Updated

July 21, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Completely anonymous sharing of IPD

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
1.5.2018, two months
Access Criteria
investigator

Locations