Two Mathematical Methods to Estimate Arterial Occlusion Pressure and Tourniquet Effectiveness in Lower Limb Surgery
Comparison Between Two Mathematical Methods to Estimate Arterial Occlusion Pressure and Tourniquet Effectiveness in Lower Limb Surgery: Randomized Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pneumatic tourniquets are widely used not only to reduce blood loss and to ensure optimal operating conditions during extremity surgery, but also in regional anesthesia (local intravenous) vein puncture and to control life or limb threatening conditions. However, compression of the tissues under a tourniquet is associated with soft tissue damage involving the skin, vessels, muscles, and most importantly, nerves, and are commonly pressure related and can be affected by tourniquet time as well. Therefore, the "minimal tourniquet inflation pressure" necessary to provide a bloodless field has been suggested to minimize the risk of complications from excessive inflation pressure. Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) is the lowest pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure required to stop the arterial blood flow into the limb, and its usage has been shown to be useful in optimizing tourniquet cuff pressures. The pressure to which a pneumatic tourniquet cuff should be inflated depends on a number of variables, including the patient's age, skin, blood pressure and the shape and size of the extremity in question, as well as the dimensions of the cuff. One of the estimation method for AOP is based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and tissue padding coefficient (KTP) values (AOP=\[SBP+10\]/KTP) according to extremity circumferences. Unver B. et al., used this method to estimate effective tourniquet pressure in total knee replacement under hypotensive general anesthesia tourniquet pressure achieved was 169.7±7.9 mmHg, while Tuncali et al., tested it again in different lower limb surgeries under general or neuraxial anesthesia with normotensive techniques and the achieved maximal tourniquet pressures used was 173.3±15.6 mmHg. Hong-yun Liu et al., established a new occlusion pressure mathematical model for the upper limb based on the correlation analysis between several possible influencing parameters and the minimal pneumatic tourniquet pressure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2018
CompletedJanuary 23, 2019
January 1, 2019
6 months
October 9, 2018
January 20, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Systolic Blood Pressure,
initial and maximal Systolic Blood Pressure,
baseline and maximum inflation
tourniquet inflation pressure.
initial and maximum tourniquet inflation pressure.
baseline and maximum inflation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
surgeon rating of the bloodlessness of the surgical field.
middle and end of surgery
Study Arms (2)
Tourniquet inflation pressure method 1
EXPERIMENTALthe pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure at 20 mmHg above the arterial occlusion pressure which will be estimated using the equation of Unver B. et al.,: (AOP=\[SBP+10\]/KTP)
Tourniquet inflation pressure method 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe pneumatic tourniquet inflateion pressure at 20 mmHg above the arterial occlusion pressure which will be estimated using the equation of Hong-yun Liu et al.,: (AOP = 17.986 + 3.158X1 + 0.408X2)
Interventions
Pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure estimation using two different mathematical equations
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult patients 18-40 years old, (ASA I-II), scheduled for knee arthroscopy under general anesthesia with pneumatic tourniquet around the thigh,
You may not qualify if:
- outside the age range, hypertensive, diabetic, complaining of any lower limb claudications, any vascular disease, hemolytic blood disorders or hypercoagulabilty.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beni Suef University, Faculty of medicine
Banī Suwayf, 62511, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Unver B, Karatosun V, Tuncali B. Effects of tourniquet pressure on rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;32(4):217-22. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e31829aef2a.
PMID: 23881019BACKGROUNDLiu HY, Guo JY, Zhang ZB, Li KY, Wang WD. Development of adaptive pneumatic tourniquet systems based on minimal inflation pressure for upper limb surgeries. Biomed Eng Online. 2013 Sep 23;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-92.
PMID: 24053348BACKGROUNDTuncali B, Boya H, Kayhan Z, Arac S, Camurdan MA. Clinical utilization of arterial occlusion pressure estimation method in lower limb surgery: effectiveness of tourniquet pressures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):171-7. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0175.
PMID: 26969952BACKGROUNDKasem SA, Al Menesy T, Badawy AA, Abd Elmawgoud A, Adel G, Badawy YA. Comparison between two mathematical methods to estimate arterial occlusion pressure and tourniquet effectiveness in lower limb surgery: a prospective, randomized, double blind, comparative study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):675-681. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00366-0. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
PMID: 31346900DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2018
First Posted
October 16, 2018
Study Start
May 12, 2018
Primary Completion
November 12, 2018
Study Completion
November 15, 2018
Last Updated
January 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01