A Comparison of the Littler Flap With the Bipedicled Nerve Flap
1 other identifier
interventional
59
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A retrospective study is conducted with 59 patients who has a combination of soft tissue and digital nerve defects following trauma treated using the Littler flap or bipedicle nerve flap.Patients are divided into two groups. The group reconstructed with the Litter flap includes 26 patients and the group reconstructed with the bipedicle nerve flap includes 33 patients.Discriminatory sensation, pain and cold intolerance of the reconstructed finger, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2018
CompletedOctober 15, 2018
August 1, 2018
7.6 years
October 8, 2018
October 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Static 2PD test
We use a Disk-Criminator to test two nearby points when touching the flap. It is often
18 months to 24 months after surgery
Study Arms (1)
nerve grafting
OTHERThe stumps of digital nerve are connected with nerve graft
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the defect in a region where sensory return is considered important
- soft tissue defect with exposed bone or tendon in only one digit
- associated single or double digital nerve defects with 1 to 4 cm in length7
- a soft tissue defect greater than 1.5 cm and less than 4 cm in length
- necessity to preserve digit length
- a patient between 15 and 60 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- injury to the course of donor arterial pedicle or donor nerve
- nerve defect less than 1 cm or larger than 4 cm
- a soft tissue defect≤1.5 cm or ≥4 cm in length
- multiple-digit soft tissue defects
- extremely contaminated wounds
- the defect in a region the flap is unable to reach, such as thumb fingertip
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Second Hospital of Tangshanlead
- Chinese PLA General Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Chen C, Tang P, Zhang L. Use of a bipedicled nerve flap taken from the dorsum of the digit for reconstruction of neurocutaneous defect in the adjacent finger. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Oct;66(10):1322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
PMID: 23829956RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2018
First Posted
October 10, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08