Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement
NG
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background and Aim: Tubular feeding is used, in patients who cannot take food through their mouths, but the digestive system has the ability to digest food. This method is safe and affordable for the patient and results in maintaining the function of the digestive system and reducing the risk of infection and sepsis. The purpose of this study was to compare the three methods of the NG tube placement in intubated patients in the emergency department of university-affiliated hospitals of Isfahan from2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized and prospective clinical trial. The statistical population of this study was all patients who had been referred to the emergency department of Al-Zahra and Ayatollah Kashani hospitals in Isfahan between2016and2018. The sample size was 25 in each group, and in total 75 subjects. The first group was NG tube insertion by the conventional method, the second group was using brake cable and the third group was embeddedby highwayman's hitch or draw hitch, using a silk thread. For all patients, demographic characteristics and possible complications were recorded. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS20 software at two statistical levels of descriptive and inferential.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2018
CompletedOctober 9, 2018
October 1, 2018
3 months
October 1, 2018
October 4, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
success rate
success rate was defined as successfully inserted NG tube inside the stomach
Intraoperative (time from entry of the NG tube through nostril til entering inside the stomach or whenever the operator declared.)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
procedure duration
Intraoperative (from nostril entry til sromach entry or operatoe declaration as the end of procedure)
Study Arms (3)
Conventional r blinded
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe participants were allocated to have NG tube inserted in a conventional or blind method.
Brake cable
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe participants were assigned to have NG tube inserted by use of a bike brake cable as a guide wire.
High way man's hitch
ACTIVE COMPARATORthey were selected to have NG tube inserted by use of silk thread knot.
Interventions
a feeding tube called naso-gastric or NG tube were inserted through nostril inside the stomach randomly by one of three methods mentioned earlier
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all intubated patients, referred to the emergency department
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of symptoms of skull base fracture,
- bleeding disorders and coagulopathies,
- maxillofacial trauma, which led to deformity and impairment of NG tube,
- upper respiratory tract diseases and anomalies,
- nasal congestion and nostril stenosis,
- esophageal disorder (esophageal stenosis and esophageal varicose vein),
- and a history of head and neck radiotherapy.
- Patients who had been intubated in other centers and being referred to these two centers were also excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Al-Zahra University Hospital
Isfahan, 8138938728, Iran
Mehdi Nasr Isfahani
Isfahan, 8194856781, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2018
First Posted
October 9, 2018
Study Start
January 21, 2017
Primary Completion
April 15, 2017
Study Completion
August 10, 2018
Last Updated
October 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share