NCT05496985

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to translate the SECONDs from French into Chinese and assess the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the SECONDs .

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 14, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 14, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

August 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

comadisorder of consciousnessbehavioral scalerehabilitationdiagnosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the SECONDs

    The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the SECONDs were evaluated by calculating the weighted Cohen's Kappa and Spearman coefficients of the differences between SECONDs and CRS-R in the diagnosis of MCS and UWS patients

    Within 10 days

  • Diagnose the level of consciousness in patients through SECONDs and CRS-R

    Detect acute (longer than 14 days, less than 28 days) or prolonged DoC (following severe acquired brain injury, longer than 28 days) patients through Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs).

    Within 10 days

  • Diagnose the level of consciousness in patients through CRS-R

    Detect acute (longer than 14 days, less than 28 days) or prolonged DoC (following severe acquired brain injury, longer than 28 days) patients through Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

    Within 10 days

Study Arms (4)

Patients in coma

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in coma were assessed by the SECONDs and CRS-R for five days.

Diagnostic Test: Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs)

Patients in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome were assessed by the SECONDs and CRS-R for five days.

Diagnostic Test: Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs)

Patients in minimally conscious state

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in minimally conscious state were assessed by the SECONDs and CRS-R for five days.

Diagnostic Test: Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs)

Patients in emerge from the minimally conscious state

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in emerge from the minimally conscious state were assessed by the SECONDs and CRS-R for five days.

Diagnostic Test: Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs)

Interventions

All patients were assessed by the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

Patients in comaPatients in emerge from the minimally conscious statePatients in minimally conscious statePatients in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Acute (longer than 14 days, less than 28 days) or prolonged DoC (following severe acquired brain injury, longer than 28 days);
  • Age: 18-85 years old;
  • No history of other neurological or psychiatric deficits;
  • Ability to speak Chinese fluently;
  • Medical stability (e.g., absence of mechanical ventilation, sedation, infection)

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

International Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain DiseasesPersistent Vegetative StateUnconsciousnessCentral Nervous System DiseasesComaConsciousness DisordersDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nervous System DiseasesBrain Damage, ChronicNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Haibo Di

    International Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute,Hangzhou Normal University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Anqi Wang

    International Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute,Hangzhou Normal University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Until the end of the protocol, all three assessors were blinded to the scores acquired by the other assessors.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Each patient was assessed by three distinct assessors who were experienced and trained to use the CRS-R. All assessments were completed within two weeks (i.e., five CRS-R to obtain a reliable diagnosis \[17\], and 7 SECONDs performed by 3 different assessors in the 2 weeks) in five different sessions. Session 1 included one evaluation with the CRS-R performed by one assessor (i.e., concurrent validity) and three evaluations with the SECONDs performed by two assessors (i.e., intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability). The other sessions (2 to 5) each included one evaluation with the SECONDs and one evaluation with the CRS-R (i.e., concurrent validity) performed by two assessors. Each SECONDs was performed alternatively either before or after the CRS-R assessment. To avoid fatigue effects and reduce the impact of within-day fluctuations of vigilance, a break of 30 to 80 min between each assessment was taken.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2022

First Posted

August 11, 2022

Study Start

December 20, 2021

Primary Completion

March 14, 2022

Study Completion

March 14, 2022

Last Updated

August 11, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations