Study Stopped
Low intervention uptake, lack of substitution of video for home visits, and study sites' decision to expand telehealth use in response to payment changes
Comparative Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care
HomePal
A Non-Inferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care in Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
3,999
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: To effectively alleviate suffering and improve quality of life for patients with serious illness and their caregivers, palliative care (PC) services must be offered across multiple settings. Research is needed to determine how best to optimize home-based palliative care (HBPC) services to meet the needs of individuals with high symptom burden and functional limitations. Aim: The investigators will compare a standard HBPC model that includes routine home visits by a nurse and provider with a more efficient tech-supported HBPC model that promotes timely inter-professional team coordination via synchronous video consultation with the provider while the nurse is in the patient's home. The investigators hypothesize that tech-supported HBPC will be as effective as standard HBPC. Design: Cluster randomized trial. Registered nurses (n\~130) will be randomly assigned to the tech-supported or standard HBPC model so that half of the patient-caregiver dyads will receive one of the two models. Setting/Participants: Kaiser Permanente (15 Southern California and Oregon sites). Patients (n=10,000) with any serious illness and a prognosis of 1-2 years and their caregivers (n=4,800) Methods: Patients and caregivers will receive standard PC services: comprehensive needs assessment and care planning, pain and symptom management, education/skills training, medication management, emotional/spiritual support; care coordination, referral to other services, and 24/7 phone assistance. Results: Primary patient outcomes: symptom improvement at 1 month and days spent at home in the last six months of life; caregiver outcome: perception of preparedness for caregiving. Conclusion: Should the more efficient tech-supported HBPC model achieves comparable improvements in outcomes that matter most to patients and caregivers, this would have a lasting impact on PC practice and policy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2020
CompletedFebruary 20, 2020
February 1, 2020
1 year
September 27, 2018
February 18, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Symptom severity (total score) using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)
The ESAS is a 10-item survey measuring symptom severity. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
Change from baseline to 1 month
Days at home in the last 180 days of life among patients surviving at least 180 days after enrolling in HBPC
Baseline to 12 months
Caregiver preparedness for caregiving using the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale
The Preparedness for Caregiving Scale is a 9-item survey measuring caregivers' perception of their preparedness for caregiving. Scores range from 0-36 with higher scores indicating higher perception of preparedness
Change from baseline to 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Days at home between study enrollment and death or study completion (365 days)
Variable, up to 12 months
Patient quality of life measured with the PROMIS-10 survey
Change from baseline to 1 and 6 months
Patient general distress measured with the distress thermometer
Change from baseline to 1 and 6 months
Palliative performance scale will be measured using all data available from routine clinical practice as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR)
Baseline and variable time periods due to reliance on available data from the EMR
Patient satisfaction-care experience measured by a study-specific survey
1 and 6 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard HBPC
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients and caregivers in standard HBPC will continue to receive usual care from the palliative care team which includes home visits
Tech-supported HBPC
EXPERIMENTALPatients and caregivers in tech-supported HBPC will receive synchronous video visits with a provider (physician or nurse practitioner) while the nurse is in the patient's home. Home visits by the palliative care team will be determined based on patients/caregivers' needs.
Interventions
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Serious illness with 12-24 month life expectancy
- Homebound
- Need for skilled nursing care (only at KP Southern California)
- English or Spanish speakers
You may not qualify if:
- \- Currently receiving HBPC
- Non-professional family, friend or other caregiver
- English or Spanish speakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Pasadena, California, 91101, United States
Kaiser Permanente Northwest
Portland, Oregon, 97227, United States
Related Publications (3)
Nguyen HQ, Haupt EC, Duan L, Hou AC, Wang SE, Mariano JD, Lee JA, McMullen C. Hospital utilisation in home palliative care: caregiver health, preparedness and burden associations. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 25:bmjspcare-2021-003455. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003455. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 35078873DERIVEDMularski RA, Mittman B, Haupt E, Wang S, Scholle S, McMullen C, Henry M, Shen E, Nguyen HQ; HomePal Research Group. Performance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Large Pragmatic Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal): Methodological and Practical Considerations for Embedded Patient-Centered Design. J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):620-627. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0164. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
PMID: 34735285DERIVEDNguyen HQ, Mularski RA, Edwards PE, Lynn J, Machado MT, McBurnie MA, McMullen C, Mittman BS, Reinke LR, Shen E, Wang SE, Werch HS; HomePal Research Group. Protocol for a Noninferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal). J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):20-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0116.
PMID: 31486724DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huong Q Nguyen, PhD
Kaiser Permanente
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard A Mularski, MD
Kaiser Permanente
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2018
First Posted
October 3, 2018
Study Start
January 7, 2019
Primary Completion
January 24, 2020
Study Completion
January 24, 2020
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share