Study Stopped
Due to COVID-19 the study was intitially paused and eventually ended.
Efficacy of an Attention Guidance VR Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a prevalent mental health concern that impacts approximately 12% of the population. One mechanism thought to maintain SAD is avoidance of faces (i.e. avoidance of negative evaluative threat). However, research on attentional processes in SAD has been confined to paradigms presented on computer monitors. To investigate attentional processes in a more naturalistic way the investigators developed an immersive, 360º-video virtual reality environment using real actors, as part of a pilot study. Participants with a range of social anxiety symptoms (from none to severe) completed a 5-minute speech in this virtual reality environment while their eye movements were recorded. Results from the study showed that greater symptoms of social anxiety were associated with avoidance of looking at faces (i.e. fewer fixations on faces). While existing treatments for SAD are moderately effective, a large number of individuals do not experience meaningful reductions in their symptoms. The overarching goal of this project is inform future treatment research for SAD. The investigators will test a brief attention guidance intervention for SAD that specifically targets avoidance of faces as a potential mechanism maintaining the disorder. The proposed research will use the eye tracking hardware and naturalistic virtual reality environment from the pilot study. The investigators will also collect eye tracking data prior to the intervention in order to investigate potential heterogeneity in the attentional processes of SAD. The investigators will test the hypotheses that (a) the attention guidance intervention, compared to the control intervention, will result in a greater reduction in symptoms of social anxiety, and (b) this effect will be mediated by the number of fixations on faces during a brief public speaking challenge following the intervention. These results will provide causal evidence related to a hypothesized mechanism maintaining SAD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2022
CompletedMarch 11, 2022
December 1, 2021
1.1 years
July 20, 2018
November 3, 2021
December 28, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety Scale Post-intervention
Questionnaire that assesses fear of public speaking Score range (total summed score): 34-170; Higher score reflects greater public speaking anxiety
Immediately following the end of the 1-week intervention
Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety Scale at 1-week
Questionnaire that assesses fear of public speaking Score range: 34-170 (total summed score); Higher score reflects greater public speaking anxiety
1-week follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale Post-intervention
Immediately following the end of the 1-week intervention
Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale at 1-week
1-week follow-up
Speech Anxiety Thoughts Inventory Post-intervention
Immediately following the end of the 1-week intervention
Speech Anxiety Thoughts Inventory at 1-week
1-week follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Attention guidance
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to the components included in the control intervention the experimental attention guidance condition consists of three unique components: (1) the rationale will include information about the importance of visually attending to the faces of the audience; (2) in addition to being given a speech topic, participants will be given target audience members to focus their gaze on during the speech. They will be told that they should look at and focus on the target audience member for the whole speech; (3) between speeches, the researcher will tell participants the percentage of time they were focused on the target face.
Control intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will complete two intervention sessions within one week. The intervention will use a manualized protocol. 1. On the first session, participants will receive a brief standardized psychoeducation module, presented via a 15-minute video recording. This video will explain the intervention, its rationale, and the procedure. 2. Participants will then have 5 minutes to plan and outline a speech based on a topic given to them. All participants will receive the same topic. Participants will not be allowed to use the outline during the public speaking exposure trials. 3. Participants will then give six speeches that are each 3 minutes long on the same topic. Participants will give all the speeches in the immersive 360º-video environment. 4. Between speeches participants will have a 1-minute break.
Interventions
Explicitly guiding attention towards faces during public speaking exposures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65;
- Fluent in English;
- Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety score \> 98;
- Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale \> 30;
- Peak fear ≥ 50 on the behavioral approach task during the baseline assessment;
- Meets DSM-5 Criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder;
- Significant visual impairment precluding the use of virtual reality equipment;
- Unstable dose of psychotropic medications within 3 weeks prior to baseline assessment;
- Current alcohol or substance use disorders;
- Current, or history of bipolar disorder; current, or history of psychosis;
- Serious suicidal risk, as determined by clinical interview.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas, 78712, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Michael Telch
- Organization
- The University of Texas at Austin
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2018
First Posted
September 25, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 11, 2020
Study Completion
March 25, 2020
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Results First Posted
March 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12