Creative Writing for Type 2 Diabetes Management
CrewD
Close Reading and Creative Writing - CrewD Program. An Alternative Educational Method for Group Care Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes Management. A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
49
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is related to the development of a new model of Group Care for patients with Diabetes - the CrewD Program, incorporating close reading and creative writing in group education. A randomized trial was designed to evaluate this intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2018
CompletedSeptember 20, 2018
September 1, 2018
9 months
September 10, 2018
September 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c levels at 6 months
Hemoglobin A1c is measured in mmol/mol units.
Up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change from baseline in weight at 6 months
Up to 6 months
Change from baseline in fat mass at 6 months
Up to 6 months
Change from baseline in waist circumference at 6 months
Up to 6 months
Change from baseline in self-reported quality of life at 6 months
Up to 6 months
Change from baseline in self-reported locus of control at 6 months
Up to 6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CrewD Program approach
EXPERIMENTALThe aim was to increase education about the disease by using narrative skills through the CrewD Program. The sessions were conducted by two group leaders: a health professional and a literature professor manager of creative writing groups. Each session had a title, which parallels the classical structured educational approach (active comparator condition), which was known in advance by the subjects: a) Who I am in Diabetes?; b) Nutrition; c) The body where I live; d) Fears; e) Can attention change things?; and f) Roots. Team leaders directed a discussion of different texts used in the sessions with the participants focusing on their feelings and on how the texts relate to themselves and to their diabetes. Patients were encouraged to participate and freely express their opinion.
Classical structured education
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach session was 90 minutes long, with a similar internal structure in all of them. Each session included the following topics: a) Chronic Disease; b) Nutrition; c) Exercise; d) Complications; e) Self-management; and f) Diabetic foot. The sessions were held in a large room, in which the seats were arranged in circle. Every session was chaired by two healthcare providers, who worked as group leaders. There was a different visual presentation in each session, with relevant theoretical information. A board with sheets of paper was available for use in the discussion along with brochures about the disease. Patients were encouraged to actively participate and take part in group-problem solving. Group leaders guided the discussion by asking questions and encouraging the discussion.
Interventions
The CrewD Program - Creative reading and writing in Diabetes Program - is a Diabetes self-management education and support program to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.
The Classical educational approach consists in an educational method based on the presentation of relevant theoretical information to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Only patients with type 2 diabetes of \>1 year known duration, aged \< 85 years were included in the intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that did not complete the four assessments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, Cox CE, Duker P, Edwards L, Fisher EB, Hanson L, Kent D, Kolb L, McLaughlin S, Orzeck E, Piette JD, Rhinehart AS, Rothman R, Sklaroff S, Tomky D, Youssef G; 2012 Standards Revision Task Force. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S144-53. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S144. No abstract available.
PMID: 24357210BACKGROUNDChrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):926-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
PMID: 26658704BACKGROUNDTrento M, Gamba S, Gentile L, Grassi G, Miselli V, Morone G, Passera P, Tonutti L, Tomalino M, Bondonio P, Cavallo F, Porta M; ROMEO Investigators. Rethink Organization to iMprove Education and Outcomes (ROMEO): a multicenter randomized trial of lifestyle intervention by group care to manage type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):745-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2024. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
PMID: 20103547BACKGROUNDTrento M, Tomelini M, Basile M, Borgo E, Passera P, Miselli V, Tomalino M, Cavallo F, Porta M. The locus of control in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes managed by individual and group care. Diabet Med. 2008 Jan;25(1):86-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02319.x.
PMID: 18199135BACKGROUNDCharon R, Hermann N, Devlin MJ. Close Reading and Creative Writing in Clinical Education: Teaching Attention, Representation, and Affiliation. Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):345-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000827.
PMID: 26200577BACKGROUNDPennebaker JW. Putting stress into words: health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jul;31(6):539-48. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90105-4.
PMID: 8347112BACKGROUNDFrattaroli J. Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):823-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823.
PMID: 17073523BACKGROUNDIngersoll GM, Marrero DG. A modified quality-of-life measure for youths: psychometric properties. Diabetes Educ. 1991 Mar-Apr;17(2):114-8. doi: 10.1177/014572179101700219.
PMID: 1995281BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDHojat M, Gonnella J, Mangione S, Nasca T, Magee M. (2003). Physician empathy in medical education and practice: experience with The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Seminars in Integrative Medicine 2003; 1(1): 25-41.
BACKGROUNDFerraro LA, Price JH, Desmond SM, Roberts SM. Development of a diabetes locus of control scale. Psychol Rep. 1987 Dec;61(3):763-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.763. No abstract available.
PMID: 3438399BACKGROUNDMarshall LE, Serran G, Cameron C. The Group Satisfaction Scale. Rockwood Psychological Services & Royal Ottawa Health Care Group - STU 2010.
BACKGROUNDFunnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, Maryniuk M, Peyrot M, Piette JD, Reader D, Siminerio LM, Weinger K, Weiss MA. National Standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-96. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S089. No abstract available.
PMID: 21193633BACKGROUNDFunnell MM, Anderson RM. Patient empowerment: a look back, a look ahead. Diabetes Educ. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):454-8, 460, 462 passim. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900310. No abstract available.
PMID: 12854337BACKGROUNDRosal MC, Ockene IS, Restrepo A, White MJ, Borg A, Olendzki B, Scavron J, Candib L, Welch G, Reed G. Randomized trial of a literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored diabetes self-management intervention for low-income latinos: latinos en control. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):838-44. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1981. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
PMID: 21378213BACKGROUNDNorris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159.
PMID: 12087014BACKGROUNDTrento M, Passera P, Borgo E, Tomalino M, Bajardi M, Cavallo F, Porta M. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care. 2004 Mar;27(3):670-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.670.
PMID: 14988283BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
João Raposo, M.D.
Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2018
First Posted
September 20, 2018
Study Start
January 5, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
September 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share