Feasibility of Endosphenoidal Coil Placement for Imaging of the Sella During Transsphenoidal Surgery
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Tumors of the pituitary gland comprise up to 20% of all brain tumors. The central location and the small size of the pituitary gland make the management of tumors particularly challenging. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) to resect pituitary tumors is highly successful at achieving complete cure for functional pituitary adenomas. It is most successful when such adenomas can be localized by preoperative MRI of the pituitary. However, in some instances, small functional tumors cannot be visualized. In the case of Cushing s disease (CD), such non-visualization may be as high as 50%. The success of transsphenoidal surgery is substantially reduced in patients with negative MRI, as some of the adenomas that cause CD are so small that they are difficult to find during surgical exploration of the pituitary. Surgical success is also diminished when tumors invade the walls of the cavernous sinus. MRI of the pituitary lacks imaging resolution to detect such invasion and so the surgeon cannot perform a complete resection with surgery based on the preoperative MRI. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) is the primary constraint on achieving high quality high resolution MRI images. SNR can be improved by longer scan times or by increasing the field strength of the MRI magnet. SNR is proportional to the square of imaging time, however, long imaging times are not clinically feasible. SNR is linearly proportional to field strength, however, replacing MRI magnets is cost prohibitive. Another strong determinant of SNR is the proximity of the MRI receiver coil to the tissue being imaged. Placement of a coil in close proximity to the structure of interest dramatically increases SNR, often as much as 10-fold. Clinically this is routinely put into practice for superficial body parts, such as the temporomandibular joints, in which small coils are placed directly over the joints to achieve rapid high-resolution imaging. For deep structures, the use of superficial coils is of no benefit. This has led to the development of endocavitary coils, such as the endorectal coil used to image the prostate gland. Such coils are now in routine clinical use here at the NIH and elsewhere. During routine TSS, the surgical approach to the pituitary provides a route for placement of imaging tools, such as handheld ultrasound and Doppler probes in close proximity to the gland. Extending this model to MRI imaging, we realized that an endocavitary surface coil within the sphenoid sinus will allow for a marked improvement in SNR for imaging the sella. To this end, we have developed an endosphenoidal coil (ESC), demonstrated its MRI safety, and performed preliminary studies in cadaver heads to determine that the ESC can be placed through the transsphenoidal approach. Placement of ESC needs no modification in the surgical TSS approach to the pituitary gland. The goal of this protocol is to examine the safety and feasibility of ESC placement and imaging during TSS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
April 24, 2026
April 20, 2026
8.8 years
September 18, 2018
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety of ESC as an Intraoperative Adjunct Tool
We hypothesize that using ESC is safe for patients undergoing TSS. We will monitor for adverse events that may arise due to the insertion, use and removal of the ESC. The surgical corridor will be monitored for bleeding, burns, physical trauma or impingement during insertion of ESC (by direct observation) and during imaging (via video feed), and after removal of the ESC (by direct observation). The adverse events will be graded as follows: Grade 0 uneventful deployment of the ESC; Grade I adverse events due to ESC deployment without any intra-operative consequences; Grade II adverse events due to ESC deployment needing surgical interventions (e.g. control of bleeding, modification of surgical approach, need for blood transfusion etc.) or burn injuries needing surgical management; Grade III severe adverse events due to ESC deployment needing immediate termination of the surgical procedure or permanent physical/neurologic injury due to impingement.
Ongoing
Feasibility of ESC as a Clinical Tool
Clinical utility will be evaluated by a board certified neuroradiologist. The utility measure is a binary outcome measure (yes/no). The neuroradiologist will also make additional subjective observations about the image quality, image resolution, imaging artifacts and image noise. For patients with microadenomas, the primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of the ESC in detecting previously detected microadenomas. A positive outcome measure will be denoted if a possible microadenoma is detected with the ESC in the same location as detected by pre-operative MRI imaging. For patients with pituitary macroadenomas, the primary outcome will be detection of invasion of the cavernous sinus and ability to detect intra-tumoral heterogeneity. For patients with MRI negative pituitary disease, the primary outcome measure will be the ability to detect adenomas. At the conclusion of enrollment, all images will be reviewed by an independent board-certified neuroradiologist.
Ongoing
Study Arms (1)
1
EXPERIMENTALENDOSPHENOIDAL COIL
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prashant Chittiboina, M.D.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2018
First Posted
September 19, 2018
Study Start
May 9, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04-20