Study Stopped
Lack of funding to progress the study
Mini Gastric Bypass vs Roux enY Gastric Bypass
MGB vs RYGB
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this research project is to assess the safety and efficacy of the MGB operation in the UK
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2019
CompletedJuly 26, 2019
July 1, 2019
6 months
September 13, 2018
July 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Excess weight loss
Amount of weight lost
2 years post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Type 2 diabetes remission
6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Morbidity
6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Mortality
6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Operative time
6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Length of stay
6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MGB
ACTIVE COMPARATORMini gastric bypass
Roux enY gastric bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoux enY gastric bypass
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- They have a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or more, or between 35 kg/m2 and 40 kg/m2 and other significant disease (for example, type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure) that could be improved if they lost weight.
- All appropriate non-surgical measures have been tried but the person has not achieved or maintained adequate, clinically beneficial weight loss.
- The person has been receiving or will receive intensive management in a tier 3 service.
- The person is generally fit for anaesthesia and surgery.
- The person commits to the need for long-term follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Not meeting the eligibility criteria
- Under 18s
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 5LT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participant will not know the arm prior to surgery, but will be made aware of it afterward
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2018
First Posted
September 17, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 24, 2019
Study Completion
July 24, 2019
Last Updated
July 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Final report and findings will be appropriately disseminated following completion of the study