NCT03669341

Brief Summary

Since 1996 proton therapy has been applied very successfully at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland to irradiate deep-seated, stationary tumors. In order to treat tumors within an organ which moves due to breathing (e.g. lung) motion mitigation strategies need to be implemented to ensure the precise irradiation of the moving target. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and compare (via MRI imaging) 2 techniques which "freeze" the movement of the lung by breath hold. One method is suppression of respiratory movement via high-frequency, mechanical ventilation by means of a Jet Ventilator (HFPV). The other technique is deep Inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) with Hyperventilation and simultaneous Inspiration of 100% O2 including daily breath-hold exercise.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 11, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 14, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 9, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

breath holdDIBHHFPVMRI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in MRI Images

    pulmonary anatomical structure points are evaluated by means of MRI scans. The difference of these MRI evaluations between the DIBH- and HFPV-technique is the primary outcome measure.

    3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in breath-hold duration

    3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH)

EXPERIMENTAL

DIBH extended by prior hyperventilation while breathing 100% O2

Other: Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH)

High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

passive Ventilation by a jet ventilator

Other: High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV)

Interventions

human-based DIBH method with short-term breath-hold training

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH)

device-based HFPV technique

High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ability to give informed consent by signature
  • healthy, i.e. normal physical and mental status

You may not qualify if:

  • contraindications to MRI (non-MRI-suitable electronical \& metal implants, claustrophobia)
  • women who are pregnant or are breast feeding
  • acute or chronic illness
  • known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • presence of any psychological or sociological condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy

Villigen, Canton of Aargau, 5232, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Emert F, Missimer J, Eichenberger PA, Walser M, Gmur C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Spengler CM. Enhanced Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold Superior to High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation for Respiratory Motion Mitigation: A Physiology-Driven, MRI-Guided Assessment Toward Optimized Lung Cancer Treatment With Proton Therapy. Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 29;11:621350. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.621350. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 33996545BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Frank Emert, PhD

    Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: All study participants will perform both techniques of suppression of respiratory motion at 4 weekly visits. They always start with the deep-inspiration-breath- hold (DIBH) technique, extended by prior hyperventilation while breathing 100% O2, followed by the high-frequency-percussive-ventilation (HFPV) technique. Inbetween the weekly visits, participants are requested to perform a daily, short breath-hold training at home.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2018

First Posted

September 13, 2018

Study Start

October 10, 2018

Primary Completion

March 11, 2019

Study Completion

August 14, 2019

Last Updated

June 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations