Assessment of 2 Different Techniques for Suppression of Respiratory Motion in Lung Cancer Treatment With Proton Therapy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Short-term Apnoea Training With Deep Inspiration Breath Hold vs High Frequency Percussive Ventilation for Apnoea-like Suppression of Respiratory Motion: a Pilot Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5T Assessing Their Application for Proton Therapy Treatment of Lung Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since 1996 proton therapy has been applied very successfully at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland to irradiate deep-seated, stationary tumors. In order to treat tumors within an organ which moves due to breathing (e.g. lung) motion mitigation strategies need to be implemented to ensure the precise irradiation of the moving target. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and compare (via MRI imaging) 2 techniques which "freeze" the movement of the lung by breath hold. One method is suppression of respiratory movement via high-frequency, mechanical ventilation by means of a Jet Ventilator (HFPV). The other technique is deep Inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) with Hyperventilation and simultaneous Inspiration of 100% O2 including daily breath-hold exercise.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 14, 2019
CompletedJune 9, 2021
June 1, 2021
5 months
September 11, 2018
June 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in MRI Images
pulmonary anatomical structure points are evaluated by means of MRI scans. The difference of these MRI evaluations between the DIBH- and HFPV-technique is the primary outcome measure.
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in breath-hold duration
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH)
EXPERIMENTALDIBH extended by prior hyperventilation while breathing 100% O2
High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpassive Ventilation by a jet ventilator
Interventions
human-based DIBH method with short-term breath-hold training
device-based HFPV technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ability to give informed consent by signature
- healthy, i.e. normal physical and mental status
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications to MRI (non-MRI-suitable electronical \& metal implants, claustrophobia)
- women who are pregnant or are breast feeding
- acute or chronic illness
- known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
- presence of any psychological or sociological condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy
Villigen, Canton of Aargau, 5232, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Emert F, Missimer J, Eichenberger PA, Walser M, Gmur C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Spengler CM. Enhanced Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold Superior to High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation for Respiratory Motion Mitigation: A Physiology-Driven, MRI-Guided Assessment Toward Optimized Lung Cancer Treatment With Proton Therapy. Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 29;11:621350. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.621350. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33996545BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank Emert, PhD
Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2018
First Posted
September 13, 2018
Study Start
October 10, 2018
Primary Completion
March 11, 2019
Study Completion
August 14, 2019
Last Updated
June 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06