NCT03658694

Brief Summary

There are currently several points concerning rTMS for pain relief that have a huge impact in the practical application of rTMS in clinical practice, but which have not been approached by previous studies. Also, an even more important issue is the frequency of the sessions in each treatment protocol. The idea of performing stimulation in chronic pain patients on a consecutive daily basis for long-term treatments seem unrealistic and potentially costly. However, it has been reported in animals, healthy subjects and FM patients that the analgesic effects of rTMS can outlast the stimulation session for several minutes and even days. This has led to the proposal that pain treatment with rTMS could be performed in consecutive daily induction sessions, followed by spaced (weekly, fortnightly and even monthly) maintenance sessions. This approach is similar to what is performed routinely in patients with major depression treated by rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and has successfully been tested in FM patients in a single- center study. Should this approach prove effective in larger prospective multicentric studies, rTMS could enter the armamentarium of non-invasive, non- pharmacological, low-adverse event therapeutic options to relieve fibromyalgia- related pain and associate symptoms. Hence, our aim is to conduct a multicentric international clinical trial on the influence of rTMS in the control of pain in a consecutive adaptive trial design where conventional rTMS (10Hz) and patterned rTMS (theta-burst) will be studied. Stimulations will be performed in a clinical practice-friendly approach, where daily maintenance sessions will be followed by weekly, and fortnightly stimulation sessions. There have been very scarce adaptive trials in the pain and non-invasive stimulation fields. This methodological approach allows for the use of lower number of patients in consecutive trials and, among other qualities, it allows for the imputation of data from the first trial into the second one, thus decreasing the duration of the studies and the number of participants.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

September 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

fibromyalgiarepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Analgesic effects of motor cortex stimulation

    Percentage of responders based on the reduction of ≥50% in pain intensity (numerical rating scale 0-10) at the end of the study compared to baseline.

    8th week of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Global impression of change

    8th and 16th weeks of treatment

  • Pain intensity

    At the end of the induction period (10th day) and 16th week

  • Mood

    8th week of treatment

  • Impact of fibromyalgia daily

    8th and 16th week of treatment

  • Interference in daily activites

    8th week of treatment

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Conventional rTMS - study 1

EXPERIMENTAL

In study 1 patients were randomly allocated to receive conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10Hz).

Procedure: Conventional rTMS - study 1

Sham rTMS - study 1

EXPERIMENTAL

In study 1 patients were randomly allocated to receive sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Procedure: Sham rTMS - study 1

Conventional rTMS - study 2

EXPERIMENTAL

In study 2, after the end of the first trial will be allocated to receive conventional of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10Hz).

Procedure: Conventional rTMS - study 2

Patterned rTMS - study 2

EXPERIMENTAL

In study 2, after the end of the first trial will be allocated to receive patterned of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Theta-burst).

Procedure: Patterned rTMS - stage 2

Interventions

Patients will be undergoing to 10Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Conventional rTMS - study 1

Patients will be undergoing to sham transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Sham rTMS - study 1

Patients will be undergoing to 10Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Conventional rTMS - study 2

Patients will be undergoing to theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Patterned rTMS - study 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients with diagnosis fibromyalgia according to the ACR 2016 criteria (patient satisfies modified 2016 fibromyalgia criteria if the following 3 conditions are met: 1) widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity scale (SSS) score 5 OR WPI of 4-6 and SSS score ≥ 9. 2) Generalized pain, defined as pain in at least 4 of 5 regions, must be present. Jaw, chest, and abdominal pain are not included in generalized pain definition. 3) Symptoms have been generally present for at least 3 months. 4) A diagnosis of fibromyalgia is valid irrespective of other diagnoses. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia does not exclude the presence of other clinically important illnesses).
  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Be able to understand study protocol and give signed, written informed consent
  • Not under opioids
  • VAS score ≥ 40/100 mm;

You may not qualify if:

  • Known abuse of alcohol or illicit drugs
  • Known psychiatric conditions
  • Contraindications to rTMS (42) (Head trauma or concussion, metal implants in the skull, pregnancy, cardiac pacemaker, medication infusion devices, previous troubles with TMS or MRI);
  • Not being under chronic contraceptive use (intrauterine dispositive or oral contraceptive)
  • Other medical conditions demand hospitalization;
  • Participation in other clinical studies at the same time

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Recife, Pernambuco, 50670-901, Brazil

Location

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC/FMUSP)

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403900, Brazil

Location

Federal University of ABC

São Bernardo do Campo, 09606-070, Brazil

Location

Ambulatório de Fisioterapia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil

Location

Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur Hôpital Ambroise Paré

Paris, 92100, France

Location

Department of Neuromodulation Osaka University

Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lins CC, Fonseca AS, Martins PN, Oliveira JCB, Fernandes AM, Baptista AF, Kubota GT, da Silva VA, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC. Investigation of predictors of pain relief with high-frequency repetitive motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation among people with fibromyalgia. Neurophysiol Clin. 2025 Nov;55(6):103109. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2025.103109. Epub 2025 Oct 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, MD, PhD

    Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This is an adaptive sequential trial of FM patients. In stage 1 patients were randomly allocated into two parallel arms (conventional rTMS, sham) using adaptive methodology. In stage 2, after the end of the first trial, patients will be allocated to two arms (conventional rTMS, patterned rTMS). Both stages will be conducted in a sequential methodology where an interim analysis will take place and indicate whether will take place trial is positive and of the scientific board agrees open its start. Recruitment time will be extended by 12 months due to dropouts related to the Covid-19 pandemic. We have had dropouts due to some patients who developed Covid-19 and also due to patients who were afraid of becoming infected during hospital visits. Those patients who dropped out of the study due to the pandemic will be excluded from the main analysis and will be analyzed as a secondary outcome.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pain Center of Department of Neurology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2018

First Posted

September 5, 2018

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations