Efficiency of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sessions After a Successful 3 Week-treatment in Fibromyalgia
Study of the Effectiveness of Maintenance rTMS Sessions for 6 Months Versus Placebo in Subjects With Fibromyalgia Responders to 3 Week-rTMS Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Maintenance rTMS sessions after a successful 3week-rTMS treatment for subjects with fibromyalgia may maintain the clinical improvement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 28, 2017
CompletedFebruary 12, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.9 years
September 11, 2013
February 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of fibromyalgia subjects maintaining a clinical improvement with rTMS maintenance sessions during 6 months
= number of fibromyalgia subjects maintaining a clinical improvement after a prior rTMS treatment (15 sessions in 3 weeks)and maintenance rTMS sessions administered at 42, 63, 84, 105, 126, 147, 168, 189, 210 days after inclusion in comparison with sham maintenance sessions. clinical improvement is described as a 30% decrease from baseline in pain feeling (visual analogue scale) and a response ≥ 6 for the Patient's global impression of Change. effect will be considered as maintained if criteria of clinical improvement present after 3 week rTMS treatment are conserved at 6 months rTMS or sham maintenance sessions.
210 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
number of rTMS responders at 3week-rTMS treatment
21 days
Study Arms (5)
rTMS-rTMS
EXPERIMENTALsubjects receiving real rTMS treatment and real rTMS maintenance sessions
sham - sham
SHAM COMPARATORsubjects receiving sham treatment and presenting a clinical improvement : they will be submitted to sham maintenance sessions
rTMS-sham
SHAM COMPARATORsubjects receiving sham rTMS maintenance sessions after successful real rTMS treatment
rTMS
EXPERIMENTALreal rTMS for 3 weeks but without clinical improvement
sham
SHAM COMPARATORsham treatment for 3 weeks without clinical improvement
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presence of the criteria from the American College of Rheumatology (2010)for fibromyalgia diagnosis,
- painful state for more than six months,
- visual analogic scale evaluation \> or = 5,
- age between 18 and 70,
- no modification in therapeutic treatment one month before and during the protocol
- presence of actual or prior antalgic chronic treatment : pregabalin, duloxetine, milnacipran, gabapentin, venlafaxine, laroxyl, grade 1 or 2 antalgic
- residence in Limoges or the periphery, or the ability to come to the hospital for the treatment
You may not qualify if:
- presence of non stabilized psychiatric comorbidity (personality trouble, addiction, suicide attempt, non controlled affective trouble),
- active epilepsy,
- previous cerebral traumatism, or cerebral surgery, intra-cranial hyper tension,
- pacemaker, metallic pieces in the brain, cochlear ocular implant, or any metallic material contra indicating magnetic resonance imaging.
- clozapine, bupropion, methadon, theophyllin, or other non chemical antalgic technic established during the previous month(kinesitherapy, relaxation, hypnosis...),
- pregnancy, or administrative and judiciary protection, absence of health insurance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Centre Hospitalier Esquirol
Limoges, 87000, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Limoges, 87000, France
Related Publications (1)
Ciobanu C, Girard M, Marin B, Labrunie A, Malauzat D. rTMS for pharmacoresistant major depression in the clinical setting of a psychiatric hospital: effectiveness and effects of age. J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 11.
PMID: 23673085BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Christophe Dumont, MD
CHU Dupuytren CH Esquirol
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor, Assistant in Rheumatologia Service CHU Limoges
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2013
First Posted
September 16, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 28, 2017
Study Completion
July 28, 2017
Last Updated
February 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02