NCT03656848

Brief Summary

The overall purpose of the FAVOR III China trial is to investigate if a strategy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields superior clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness compared to a strategy of standard coronary angiography-guided PCI in evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
3,847

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 25, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 19, 2021

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Quantitative Coronary AngiographyQuantitative Flow RatioCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial IschaemiaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Circulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • MACE

    A composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction and any ischemia-driven revascularization

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • MACE excluding peri-procedural MI (Major secondary endpoint)

    1 year

  • MACE

    1 month, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years

  • Death

    1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years

  • MI

    1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years

  • Target vessel revascularization (TVR)

    1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

QFR-guided PCI group

EXPERIMENTAL

If the patient is assigned to QFR-guided PCI, QFR is first measured in all coronary arteries with DS% ≥ 50% and ≤ 90%. Then PCI treatment is performed in lesions with QFR ≤ 0.80, and optimal medicine treatment is prescribed to those with QFR \> 0.80. It is strongly recommended to select the device size based on the 3D-QCA measurements in this group.

Diagnostic Test: QFRDiagnostic Test: Angiography

Angiography-guided PCI group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

If the patient is assigned to angiography-guided PCI, then the investigator performs PCI according to the stenosis severity based on visual assessment of the angiogram. No other functional tests such as FFR/iFR can be used for further assessment of the lesion before PCI.

Diagnostic Test: Angiography

Interventions

QFRDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

QFR is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis by calculation of the pressure drop in the vessel based on two angiographic projections.

Also known as: Quantitative Flow Ratio
QFR-guided PCI group
AngiographyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Coronary angiography is a procedure that uses contrast under x-ray pictures to detect stenosis in the coronary arteries

Also known as: Coronary angiography
Angiography-guided PCI groupQFR-guided PCI group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Stable or unstable angina pectoris, or post-acute myocardial infarction (≥ 72 hrs)
  • Signed written informed consent
  • Eligible for PCI by the operators
  • At least one lesion is present of DS% ≥50% and ≤90% in one major native epicardial coronary artery and supplying viable myocardium
  • Reference lumen diameter ≥ 2.5mm by visual assessment

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure (NYHA ≥III)
  • Severely impaired renal function: creatinine \> 150μmol/L or Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR \< 45 ml/kg/1.73 m2
  • Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents
  • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the course of the trial
  • Life expectancy less than one year
  • With only one coronary artery lesion(DS%\>90%)with TIMI flow \< 3
  • Target stenoses are culprit lesions related with acute myocardial infarction
  • Target stenoses in the vessel involving myocardial bridge
  • Poor angiographic image quality precluding vessel contour detection or with suboptimal contrast filling
  • Severe overlap in the stenosed segment or severe tortuosity of any target vessel deemed unable for QFR measurement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.

    PMID: 27712739BACKGROUND
  • Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Di Serafino L, Di Girolamo D, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Botker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.

    PMID: 29980523BACKGROUND
  • Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    PMID: 29101020BACKGROUND
  • Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.

    PMID: 19144937BACKGROUND
  • De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

    PMID: 22924638BACKGROUND
  • Song L, Tu S, Sun Z, Wang Y, Ding D, Guan C, Xie L, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Kirtane AJ, Serruys PW, Wijns W, Windecker S, Leon MB, Stone GW, Qiao S, Xu B; FAVOR III China Investigators. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial. Am Heart J. 2020 May;223:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

    PMID: 32179258BACKGROUND
  • Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Fu X, Liu J, Zhao Y, Escaned J, Wang Y, Fearon WF, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Serruys PW, Yang W, Wijns W, Guan C, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

  • Jin Z, Xu B, Yang X, Jia R, Meng S, Hu H, Deng Y, Cao X, Ruan Y, Han J, Liu J, Qu X, Zhou Y, Wang J, Fu G, Yu B, Wang Y, Guan C, Song L, Tu S, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China Study Group. Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.044.

  • Song L, Xu B, Tu S, Guan C, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Zhang R, Liu J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Wijns W, Yang W, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China Study Group. 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 29;80(22):2089-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

  • Zhang R, Wang HY, Song L, Guan C, Yin D, Zhu C, Feng L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Liu W, Qiao S, Tu S, Wijns W, Dou K; FAVOR III China Study Group. Rationales Behind Physiology-Guided Revascularization: Diagnostic Impact of Quantitative Flow Ratio in the FAVOR III China Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Nov 20:S1936-8798(25)02702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.042. Online ahead of print.

  • Ding S, Zhou Z, Zou Z, Cheng F, Sheng X, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Pan H, Xu Y, Chu M, Wang Y, Guan C, Tu S, Kirtane AJ, Qiao S, Song L, Stone GW, Pu J; FAVOR III China Study Group. Two-year outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome: a prespecified secondary analysis of FAVOR III China. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 30;88:103461. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103461. eCollection 2025 Oct.

  • Geng Y, Guan C, Jiang Y, Yang W, Yu B, Fu G, Pu J, Qu X, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Yu L, Huang Y, Tu S, Qiao S, Song L. Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy after functionally complete revascularisation in patients with obstructive coronary artery diseases. Heart. 2025 Aug 7:heartjnl-2025-325670. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325670. Online ahead of print.

  • Dai J, Guan C, Xu X, Hou J, Jia H, Yu H, Jin Z, Fu G, Wu X, Wang L, Huang R, Shen Z, Zhao Y, Jin Y, Song L, Tu S, Qiao S, Yu B, Xu B, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Treatment of Patients With Physiologically Intermediate Coronary Lesions. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e035756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035756. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

  • Zhao Y, Guan C, Wang Y, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Chen Y, Guo L, Qu X, Zhang Y, Dou K, Wu Y, Yang W, Tu S, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Qiao S, Cohen DJ, Krumholz HM, Xu B, Song L; FAVOR III China Study Group. Cost-effectiveness of angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 May 20;138(10):1186-1193. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003484. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

  • Chen Y, Gao L, Vogel B, Tian F, Jin Q, Guo J, Sun Z, Yang W, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Pu J, Qu X, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Yu L, Guan C, Tu S, Qiao S, Xu B, Mehran R, Song L; FAVOR III China Study Group. Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated With Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Asia. 2023 Nov 28;4(3):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.09.012. eCollection 2024 Mar.

  • Tu S, Xu B, Chen L, Hong H, Wang Z, Li C, Chu M, Song L, Guan C, Yu B, Jin Z, Fu G, Liu X, Yang J, Chen Y, Ge J, Qiao S, Wijns W; FAVOR III China Study Group. Short-Term Risk Stratification of Non-Flow-Limiting Coronary Stenosis by Angiographically Derived Radial Wall Strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 28;81(8):756-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.056.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Stenosis

Interventions

AngiographyCoronary Angiography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularCardiac Imaging TechniquesHeart Function Tests

Study Officials

  • Bo Xu, MBBS

    Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Shubin Qiao, MD

    Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This is a blinded clinical trial. Subjects and clinical assessor will be blinded to the assignment results. All the study site personnel will receive training for the blinding measures before the trial initiating. In addition to standard procedural sedation, music-playing headphones will be worn by the patient during the whole procedure, and patients in both groups will be preset a 10 minutes delay for QFR calculation before the PCI procedure, a lesion/device evaluation form is required to fill in during the period in both groups, to reduce the possibility of unblinding. All the study site personnel will be trained not to disclose the treatment assignment to the subject in any unplanned time. Subject blinding should be maintained until the one-year follow-up visit for all registered subjects is completed.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Catheterization Laboratories

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2018

First Posted

September 4, 2018

Study Start

December 25, 2018

Primary Completion

February 19, 2021

Study Completion

February 19, 2025

Last Updated

December 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations