Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
2
50%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution2 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
2(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

4

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Completed(1)
Other(2)

Detailed Status

unknown2
Not yet recruiting1
Completed1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
4
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A2 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

unknown250%
not_yet_recruiting125%
completed125%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 4 of 4
completed

Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio

NCT06305572
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Clinical Outcomes of CT-FFR Versus QFR-guided Strategy for Decision-Making in Patients With Stable Chest Pain

NCT05857904
unknownnot_applicable

The FAVOR III China Study

NCT03656848
unknown

Diagnostic Accuracy of CCTA-derived Versus AngiogRaphy-dErived QuantitativE Flow Ratio (CAREER) Study

NCT04665817

Clinical Trials (4)

Showing 4 of 4 trials
NCT06305572

Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio

Completed
NCT05857904Not Applicable

Clinical Outcomes of CT-FFR Versus QFR-guided Strategy for Decision-Making in Patients With Stable Chest Pain

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT03656848Not Applicable

The FAVOR III China Study

Unknown
NCT04665817

Diagnostic Accuracy of CCTA-derived Versus AngiogRaphy-dErived QuantitativE Flow Ratio (CAREER) Study

Unknown

All 4 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Total Trials
4