Effects of Balance Training on Fall Risk and Mobility in the Elderly
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pakistan is a country devoid of health-care facilities and training programs on fall prevention. There is lack of research, awareness and implication of geriatric rehabilitation on elderly population addressing balance and fall risk assessment however very few cross-sectional studies of poor quality evidence are available on this issue. To best of investigators' knowledge, no interventional studies have been conducted in our country so far on this topic. . We aim to use a integrated method of balance training that uses patients judgment, visual feedback, proprioception and balance training with the help of new technology/devices to improve balance. And compare it to conventional treatment. We also aim to assess risk factors of fall in geriatric population, decreasing risks of falls and increasing awareness regarding geriatric rehabilitation and balance training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedSeptember 4, 2018
August 1, 2018
12 months
August 13, 2018
August 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Berg balance scale - Change is being assessed
Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)
Quantitative measure of balance via Biodex balance system - Change is being assessed
Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)
Forward reach test - Change is being assessed
Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)
Timed Up and Go Test - Change is being assessed
Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)
Study Arms (3)
Control Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORWarm Up followed by Conventional Balance Training (Internal and External Perturbations)
Control Group B
NO INTERVENTIONControl group. No intervention given to participants.
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALWarm Up followed by Biodex Balance Training
Interventions
10 low jumps 5 Illiopoase Stretches 5 L/L Abductor Stretches 10 Trunk rotations 10 Should Circumduction Clock wise/Counter clockwise 10 Cervical Rotations Clockwise/Counter Clockwise
Internal Protuberances: 1. Looking up/Looking down/looking over the shoulder (Rt. /Lt.) 10 Reps Each 2. Looking behind over the shoulder (Rt. /Lt.)10 Reps 3. Looking Up with overhead Upper Limb Flexion. 5 Reps 4. Reaching out of Base of support (Rt. /Lt. / midline Cross) 10 Reps Each 5. Side to Side weight Shifting 10 Reps 6. Standing on toes/Heels 10 Reps each External Protuberance: 1. Tuck forward/ Backward/ Sideways(Rt. /Lt.) 10 reps Each 2. Bosu Ball Training
Biodex Balance Training Using Biodex Balance System SD
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals of age 60 -80 years
- Both male and females
You may not qualify if:
- Musculoskeletal conditions
- Fractures
- Severe arthritis
- Neurological conditions
- Epilepsy
- Parkinson
- Alzheimer's disease
- Impaired cognition
- Other systemic diseases or co-morbidities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Foundation University Islamabad
Islamabad, Federal, 46000, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48.
PMID: 20485226BACKGROUNDSibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB. Balance assessment practices and use of standardized balance measures among Ontario physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2011 Nov;91(11):1583-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110063. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
PMID: 21868613BACKGROUNDAmbrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013 May;75(1):51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
PMID: 23523272BACKGROUNDTinetti ME, Kumar C. The patient who falls: "It's always a trade-off". JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):258-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2024.
PMID: 20085954BACKGROUNDGeiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J, Hicks RR. Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training. Phys Ther. 2001 Apr;81(4):995-1005.
PMID: 11276182BACKGROUNDSchoene D, Valenzuela T, Lord SR, de Bruin ED. The effect of interactive cognitive-motor training in reducing fall risk in older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Sep 20;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-107.
PMID: 25240384BACKGROUNDSchwenk M, Grewal GS, Honarvar B, Schwenk S, Mohler J, Khalsa DS, Najafi B. Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Dec 13;11:164. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-164.
PMID: 25496052BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Furqan Ahmed Siddiqi, BSPT, PP-DPT, PhD
Foundation University Islamabad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor was not aware regarding the allocation of participants to study groups.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Dean (Academics) FUIRS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2018
First Posted
September 4, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 15, 2017
Study Completion
February 15, 2017
Last Updated
September 4, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share