Study Stopped
interim analysis produced significant results, so we ended enrollment
Pain Perception During Vulvar Biopsy
A Comparison of Pain Perception Using Topical EMLA Cream Versus Lidocaine Injection for Vulvar Biopsy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare pain control during vulvar biopsy following either (1) application of EMLA (a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) cream or (2) injection of 1% lidocaine. We hypothesize that lidocaine will provide better biopsy analgesia, but the benefit will be offset by the pain of lidocaine injection compared to EMLA application, thus there will not be a significant difference in highest pain scores between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 12, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
6 months
August 29, 2018
December 20, 2019
January 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Highest Pain Score
The highest pain score recorded (at time of numbing or at time of biopsy) controlled for baseline pain title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate pain in the area of your vulva (external genitalia) during numbing OR biopsy min: 0 (no pain) max: 100 (worst pain imaginable)
no more than 5 minutes after numbing or 5 minutes after biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain During Biopsy as Measured by a Pain Scale
No more than 5 minutes after receiving the biopsy
Baseline Vulvar Pain
no more than 30 minutes prior to procedure
Anxiety Before the Procedure as Measured by an Anxiety Scale
No more than 30 minutes before the procedure
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Score for Baseline Anxiety
no more than 30 minutes before the procedure
Acceptance of the Procedure as Measured by a Satisfaction Scale
up to 30 minutes after the procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMLA
ACTIVE COMPARATORLidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Patients undergoing a vulvar biopsy will be randomized to receive EMLA cream or a lidocaine injection as their numbing agent prior to the procedure.
Patients undergoing a vulvar biopsy will be randomized to receive EMLA cream or a lidocaine injection as their numbing agent prior to the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females above age 18 presenting to Duke Gynecology Oncology clinic for vulvar biopsy
- Able to provide informed consent in English and agree to the risks of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to provide informed consent
- Vulvar biopsy on a hair bearing surface
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke Univeristy
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (1)
Williams LK, Weber JM, Pieper C, Lorenzo A, Moss H, Havrilesky LJ. Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream Compared With Injected Lidocaine for Vulvar Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):311-318. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003660.
PMID: 31923074DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
unblinded patients and providers, prior experience with vulvar biopsy may be biasing, pre-procedure anxiety may be biased because posed after randomization, no gold standard for pain assessment
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Laura Havrilesky
- Organization
- Duke University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Havrilesky, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2018
First Posted
August 31, 2018
Study Start
September 17, 2018
Primary Completion
March 12, 2019
Study Completion
March 12, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Results First Posted
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01