NCT03650725

Brief Summary

Background: In randomized controlled trials, split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy has been shown to provide better bowel cleansing than day before bowel preparation. However, people who volunteer to be in clinical trials may be more adherent to a challenging bowel preparation regimen than people in the general community undergoing colonoscopy. This may be especially true for colonoscopies scheduled for the morning, when the later dose of the split-dose bowel preparation would be administered in the early morning hours. Hence the results of the available trials may not be applicable to patients undergoing morning colonoscopy in routine medical practices. Aims: To compare the effectiveness of mandatory split-dose bowel preparation to optional split-dose bowel preparation protocols for morning colonoscopies in a non-inferiority pragmatic trial. Anticipated results and significance: The study will produce a better understanding of the most effective approach to bowel preparation for early morning colonoscopies and suggest specific recommendations for colonoscopy practice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 30, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2018

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Colonoscopybowel preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of bowel cleanliness as measured by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score (0-2) in all segments

    Proportion with adequate cleansing as measured by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score ≥2 in all segments. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score is reported as score of 0 to 3 in 3 segments of the colon. The score is then summed for a total score of 0 to 9. Higher Boston score, better quality of bowel cleanliness.

    At the scheduled colonoscopy procedure performed with the instructions provided, expected average within 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Composite with any of the following: cancellations in the day before colonoscopy; no shows for colonoscopy appointment; phone calls for questions on the bowel preparation and/or rescheduling because of the bowel preparation.

    Anytime before the scheduled colonoscopy procedure performed with the instructions provided, expected average within 3 months

  • Amount of laxative intake

    In the 24 hours before the scheduled colonoscopy,expected average within 3 months

  • Proportion with split dose laxative intake

    In the 24 hours before the scheduled colonoscopy,expected average within 3 months

  • Endoscopic Outcome 1: Cecal intubation (colonoscopy completion)

    At the scheduled colonoscopy procedure, expected average within 3 months

  • Endoscopic Outcome 2: Withdrawal time during colonoscopy performance

    At the scheduled colonoscopy procedure, expected average within 3 months

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of bowel cleanliness as measured by total Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale Score (0-14)

    At the scheduled colonoscopy procedure performed with the instructions provided, expected average within 3 months

Study Arms (2)

Mandatory Split bowel preparation

Patients will be advised to take 4 liters of polyethylene glycol (PEG), split into two 2 liter doses. The first 2 liters are to be taken starting at 1800 hours the day before the colonoscopy, and the second dose is to be taken starting 4-5 hours prior to the scheduled time for the colonoscopy. Each dose will be taken within a 2-hour time span.

Other: Mandatory Split bowel preparation

Optional Split bowel preparation

Patients will be advised on split-dose bowel preparation (as per option 1), but will also receive instructions on day before bowel preparation. The instructions will indicate that split-dose bowel preparation is the optimal preparation for cleansing the bowel and for visualizing polyps, but they may choose day before bowel preparation if the split dose preparation is too difficult for them.

Interventions

Intervention describes the standard of care patient split bowel preparation instructions as mandatory, instead of giving patient instructions with option of choice between split or day before bowel prep.

Also known as: Instructions for Bowel preparation before colonoscopy
Mandatory Split bowel preparation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Description of Population: We will enroll all persons who are scheduled to undergo colonoscopy by one of the four participating gastroenterologists at an outpatient hospital-based endoscopy centre in Winnipeg, Canada, in this trial. These four gastroenterologists have been in practice for 10 years or greater, and all perform over 400 colonoscopies annually. Patients are referred to these gastroenterologists by a centralized referral program, which is responsible for scheduling the procedure and for distributing the bowel preparation instructions- This program is randomly assigning to mandatory and optional split preparation as part of routine care; stratified randomization by early vs. later morning.

You may qualify if:

  • Must be 18 years of age or older
  • Must have colonoscopy appointment with any 4 of the participating GI doctors at Health Sciences Centre-Winnipeg
  • Must use 4 liter type of bowel preparation

You may not qualify if:

  • Has colonoscopy appointment with non-participating GI doctor and/or a non-participating endoscopy hospital/clinic
  • Patient and/or referral doctor requested a non-4 liter bowel preparation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Health Sciences Center

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Rex DK. Optimal bowel preparation--a practical guide for clinicians. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;11(7):419-25. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.35. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

    PMID: 24686267BACKGROUND
  • Martel M, Barkun AN, Menard C, Restellini S, Kherad O, Vanasse A. Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):79-88. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

    PMID: 25863216BACKGROUND
  • Horton N, Garber A, Hasson H, Lopez R, Burke CA. Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1330-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.273. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

    PMID: 27377521BACKGROUND
  • Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, Senore C, Fasoli R, Anderloni A, Buffoli F, Savarese MF, Spinzi G, Rex DK, Repici A. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):270-277. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

    PMID: 26657900BACKGROUND
  • Bucci C, Rotondano G, Hassan C, Rea M, Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Ciacci C, Marmo R. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):566-576.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.320. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

    PMID: 25053529BACKGROUND
  • Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, Cryer B, Davila R, Cipher D, Harford WV. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.

    PMID: 19251013BACKGROUND
  • Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25239068BACKGROUND
  • Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

    PMID: 23335011BACKGROUND
  • Ton L, Lee H, Taunk P, Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Nationwide variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1726-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3262-8. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

    PMID: 24985353BACKGROUND
  • Clark BT, Protiva P, Nagar A, Imaeda A, Ciarleglio MM, Deng Y, Laine L. Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

    PMID: 26439436BACKGROUND
  • Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

    PMID: 24629422BACKGROUND
  • Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

    PMID: 26782820BACKGROUND
  • Menees SB, Kim HM, Wren P, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Elta GH, Foster S, Korsnes S, Graustein B, Schoenfeld P. Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):811-820.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.024. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

    PMID: 24631492BACKGROUND
  • Singh H, Kaita L, Taylor G, Nugent Z, Bernstein C. Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;28(4):185-90. doi: 10.1155/2014/635932.

    PMID: 24729991BACKGROUND
  • Porostocky P, Chiba N, Colacino P, Sadowski D, Singh H. A survey of sedation practices for colonoscopy in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;25(5):255-60. doi: 10.1155/2011/783706.

    PMID: 21647459BACKGROUND
  • Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct;139(4):1128-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.052. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

    PMID: 20600026BACKGROUND
  • Singh H, Penfold RB, De Coster C, Au W, Bernstein CN, Moffatt M. Predictors of serious complications associated with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in a major city-wide health region. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;24(7):425-30. doi: 10.1155/2010/714591.

    PMID: 20652157BACKGROUND
  • Loftus R, Nugent Z, Graff LA, Schumacher F, Bernstein CN, Singh H. Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):259-66. doi: 10.1155/2013/615206.

    PMID: 23712300BACKGROUND
  • Singh H, Bay D, Ip S, Bernstein CN, Nugent Z, Gheorghe R, Wightman R. Pathological reassessment of hyperplastic colon polyps in a city-wide pathology practice: implications for polyp surveillance recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.026.

    PMID: 23078924BACKGROUND
  • Pruthi D, Duerksen DR, Singh H. The practice of gastrostomy tube placement across a Canadian regional health authority. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1541-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.756. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

    PMID: 20104220BACKGROUND
  • Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2366-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366.

    PMID: 16720822BACKGROUND
  • Shaffer SR, Lambert P, Unruh C, Harland E, Helewa RM, Decker K, Singh H. Optimizing Timing of Follow-Up Colonoscopy: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial of a Knowledge Translation Tool. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;119(3):547-555. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002542. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

  • Dolovich C, Unruh C, Moffatt DC, Loewen C, Kaita B, Barkun AN, Martel M, Singh H. Mandatory vs. optional split-dose bowel preparation for morning colonoscopies: a pragmatic noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2023 Sep;55(9):822-835. doi: 10.1055/a-2070-5561. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Harminder Singh, MD, MPH

    University of Manitoba

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2018

First Posted

August 29, 2018

Study Start

June 30, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2023

Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations