Examining Expectancy Challenges to Prevent Nonmedical Prescription Stimulant Use
1 other identifier
interventional
131
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nonmedical prescription stimulant use (NPS) is commonly reported among college students for cognitive enhancement purposes, though it is associated with numerous negative psychological and physical consequences. Despite increasingly high prevalence rates and widespread acknowledgement of the need for efficacious interventions, little is known regarding how to prevent or treat this behavior. An intervention that targets cognitive enhancement motives and expectancy effects related to NPS may be particularly effective in light of recent research purporting limited evidence for meaningful NPS-related cognitive improvements among individuals without legitimate attention deficits. The primary objective of this proposal is to examine the efficacy of an intervention that successfully prevents NPS among college students by modifying expectations for NPS-related effects, while at the same time providing alternative means of enhancing cognition and arousal. Participants will be 126 stimulant-naïve college students who report a combination of risk factors for NPS. They will be randomized to one of three treatment conditions: a placebo-based expectancy challenge intervention that solely aims to modify expectancies related to NPS, a caffeine-based expectancy challenge intervention that includes expectancy modification combined with a safer alternative for cognitive enhancement, or a control group. Multilevel mixed modeling and survival analyses will be used to 1) examine changes in NPS-related expectancy effects across a 6-month follow-up period, and 2) assess incidence of NPS over the follow-up period, respectively, across the three groups. It is hypothesized that both expectancy challenge interventions will successfully modify expectancies compared to the control group and that they will be maintained over the follow-up period. It is also expected that the caffeine-based intervention will most successfully prevent NPS through a combination of expectancy modification and encouraging safe use of caffeine rather than prescription stimulants to achieve desired outcomes. Mediational analyses will also be employed to assess whether changes in expectancy effects via the interventions are responsible for differences in initiation rates between groups. The results of this project will facilitate the development of larger-scale prevention efforts to target the high rate of NPS on college campuses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 4, 2020
November 1, 2020
2.1 years
July 5, 2018
November 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Prescription Stimulant Expectancy Modification
This will be assessed via changes on the Prescription Stimulant Expectancy Questionnaire-II. This scale includes 4 subscales, each of which will be assessed: cognitive enhancement, social enhancement, guilt and dependence, and anxiety and arousal. Each item is assessed on a 5-point scale, and scores for each subscale are calculated by averaging across relevant items (i.e., scores on each factor can range from 0-4); higher scores indicate stronger expectancies in that domain.
7 months
Incidence of nonmedical prescription stimulant use
Whether or not participants initiate nonmedical prescription stimulant use, and the approximate date, will be assessed over the follow-up period.
7 months
Achievement Needs Modification - Self Efficacy for Learning
Achievement needs are being assessed via the Self Efficacy for Learning Form. Items on the Self Efficacy for Learning Form are each scored from 0 - 100 with regard to percent confidence that each behavior can be carried out. Scores across items will be averaged for a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating poorer self-efficacy and consequently higher achievement needs.
7 months
Achievement Needs Modification - Academic Achievement Goals
Achievement needs are also being assessed via the Academic Achievement Goal Questionnaire. A total score will be used for this measure. Each item is answered on a 7 point scale; thus, scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating strong achievement goals/needs.
7 months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Intention to Use
7 months
Modification of Caffeine Expectancy Effects
7 months
Modification of Alcohol Expectancy Effects
7 months
Subjective Mood and Arousal
2 weeks
Subjective Drug Effects
2 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Caffeine-Based Expectancy Challenge
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will ingest caffeine under the guise of Adderall prior to completing tasks. They will engage in an expectancy challenge intervention designed to both challenge expectancies for prescription stimulants and promote safe caffeine use for cognitive/mood enhancement.
Placebo-Based Expectancy Challenge
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will ingest placebo under the guise of Adderall prior to completing tasks. They will engage in an expectancy challenge intervention designed to challenge expectancies for prescription stimulants.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Intervention to alter expectancies and encourage safe drug substitution (harm reduction plus expectancy modification)
Intervention to alter expectancies (expectancy modification only)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Native English speakers
- Current undergraduate enrollment
- Prescription stimulant naive
- At-risk for nonmedical prescription stimulant use, defined by endorsement of 2+ risk factors: male sex OR white race, Greek involvement, GPA \< 3.5, past two-week binge drinking, past-month marijuana
- Willingness to ingest Adderall in the laboratory
- Past-month caffeine use
You may not qualify if:
- Lifetime history of use of any prescription stimulant
- Current psychiatric diagnosis
- Current psychiatric medication use
- Smoking \> 5 cigarettes daily or daily use of any other nicotine product
- History of cardiac problems, diabetes, or regular hypoglycemia
- Current pregnancy or breastfeeding
- History of adverse reactions to caffeine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wyoming
Laramie, Wyoming, 82071, United States
Related Publications (1)
Looby A, Piccorelli AV, Zimmerman L, Falco C, Livingston NR, Akin C, Benton S, Juliano LM. Expectancy for Adderall influences subjective mood and drug effects regardless of concurrent caffeine ingestion: A randomized controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Jan;241(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06467-8. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
PMID: 37740001DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alison Looby, PhD
University of Wyoming
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2018
First Posted
August 27, 2018
Study Start
September 4, 2018
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11