Guided Bone Regeneration With Particulate Versus Block Graft

NCT03646734 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Zek
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 30
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The aim of present study was to compare two bone augmentation techniques (Guided Bone Regeneration, GBR, with autogenous block graft and GBR with particulate autograft plus xenograft) in terms of efficacy, complications, operational parameters (cost of the materials used, time for patient preparation, time for surgery, fatigue of the physician caused by surgery) tolerability by the patient and patient comfort.

Conditions

Surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• bone gain

  Bone gain was calculated by cone beam computerized tomography

  6 month after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Pain

  Post-operative pain was assessed at 3, 7, and 14 days.

Study Arms (2)

Guided Bone Regeneration with Particulate graft

patients who had inadequate alveolar crest (crest width \<4mm) and requested of dental implant placement, treated with guided bone regeration with particulate graft

Guided Bone Regeneration with block graft

patients who had inadequate alveolar crest (crest width \<4mm) and requested of dental implant placement, treated with guided bone regeration with block graft

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 30 Years - 62 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admitted to the clinic with a complaint of tooth loss and inadequate alveolar crest (crest width \<4mm) and requested of dental implant placement were examined. Patients with any systemic disease , smoking or alchol habits and medications did not included into the study due to avoid any possible effects on our results

You may qualify if:

• to 62 years of age
• systemically health
• no smoking
• no use of medications for previous 6 months
• no pregnancy and lactation
• no contraindications for periodontal surgery.

You may not qualify if:

• \<30 and \>62 years of age
• patients with systemic disease
• smoking habit ( current or past)
• any medication
• acute illness
• pregnancy or lactation

Sponsors & Collaborators

• TC Erciyes University: lead

Study Officials

• Zekeriya Taşdemir, Phd

  TC Erciyes University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CONTROL
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 21, 2018
• First Posted: August 24, 2018
• Study Start: January 10, 2017
• Primary Completion: January 10, 2018
• Study Completion: April 10, 2018
• Last Updated: August 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08