Reliability of Function Tests for People With Back Pain.
Reliability of Functional Tests for Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Back pain is often accompanied by changes in function. The performance of individuals with their backs on their wills may become more functional. It is believed that the test will present good to excellent reliability in individuals with chronic back pain. From this, it can be used in the clinic to verify the functional capacity of these individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 13, 2018
CompletedDecember 13, 2018
December 1, 2018
5 months
August 20, 2018
December 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distance traveled in meters.
Measured by the 6-minute walk test. Individuals should walk in a 30 meter corridor for 6 uninterrupted minutes.
The individual will perform 42 minutes of testing, two walking tests of 6 minutes plus 30 minutes of rest
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Pain intensity
5 minutes
Functional Incapacity
10 minutes
Physical activity level
10 minutes
Gait Speed
5 minutes
Functional lower extremity strength
30 seconds.
Study Arms (1)
Functional Tests
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undertook 6-minute walk test, 10 meters walk test and 30 second sit to stand test.
Interventions
First day: Participants undertook 6-minute walk test. There was a 30-minute interval between the first and second test, when the patient was asked to rest. During the resting period, they respond a pain intensity, functional capacity and physical activity level questionnaire. Second day: the participants repeated the test and questionnaires.
First day: After the second 6-minute walk test the participants perform the 10-meter walk test, the test must be performed three times with a 30-second interval, at the end the average test velocity. Second day: the participants repeated the test.
At the end of the tests the participants perform the 30 Second Sit to Stand Test on the first and second day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both sexes aged 20 to 65 years and low back pain for more than 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute pain of back pain that disables the performance of the tests.
- Pregnancy.
- Neoplasms.
- Known heart, lung or metabolic diseases.
- Hypotension (BP \< 90 x 60 mmHg) or stage II hypertension (BP \> 140 x 90 mmHg), medicated or not.
- Fall or faint in the previous two months.
- Have not undergone any spinal surgery.
- Have not had neuromuscular impairment in the last three months and who need help to follow the instructions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alessandro Haupenthallead
- Santa Catarina Federal Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Santa Catarina Federal University
Araranguá, Santa Catarina, 88.905-120, Brazil
Related Publications (8)
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 16550448BACKGROUNDATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. No abstract available.
PMID: 12091180BACKGROUNDBritto RR, Sousa LAP. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos- Uma normatização brasileira. Fisioterapia em Movimento 19(4):49-54, 2006.
BACKGROUNDChou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28192793BACKGROUNDCraig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
PMID: 12900694BACKGROUNDEnright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 1):1384-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086.
PMID: 9817683BACKGROUNDKoo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27330520BACKGROUNDLamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):23-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0825-y. Epub 2005 Apr 29.
PMID: 15864670BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aline L Ballico, Student
Santa Catarina Federal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- All data were color coded to guarantee that the investigator who processed the data was blinded to the conditions.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2018
First Posted
August 24, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
October 25, 2018
Study Completion
November 13, 2018
Last Updated
December 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share