Arthroscopic Versus Open Brostrom for Ankle Instability
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Ankle sprains are among the most prevalent lesions in primary care. A substantial number of these ligament lesions will develop ankle instability and require a surgical procedure. The Brostrom-Gould technique is the standard surgical approach for this condition, providing excellent results over the years. Thru the last decades, the arthroscopic Brostrom has gain popularity and support by several studies. Yet, there is no consensus regarding the best procedure to treat ankle instability nowadays. Hypothesis: The arthroscopic Brostrom technique will present better levels of pain and function when compared to the standard open approach. Design: blinded, in parallel groups, multicentric, randomized, clinical trial. Materials and Methods: 98 patients with a diagnosis of chronic ankle instability, referred from primary or secondary health care services, will be assessed and enrolled in this study. Participants will be divided in two groups (randomized by sequentially numbered identical envelopes, which will be administered serially to participants), one containing the open Brostrom repair technique and the other comprehending the arthroscopic Brostrom approach. The assessments will occur in 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Patients will be evaluated primarily by complications and secondarily the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The investigators will use Comparison of Two Proportions via relative frequency analysis, the Pearson Correlation the Chi-Square test and the ANOVA for statistical analyses. Discussion: This study intends to establish if the arthroscopic Brostrom technique can produce excellent and reliable results when treating chronic ankle instability. A shorter surgical time, a better cosmetic appearance and a smaller soft tissue injury would support the choice for this procedure if the outcomes could be compared to the open approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 5, 2027
September 27, 2024
September 1, 2024
7.5 years
August 15, 2018
September 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complications (change)
* Dehiscence: inability to heal the soft tissue coverage until the end of the 4th post-operative week. * Peripherical nerve damage: hypoesthesia or paresthesia not solved until the end of the 6th month after the surgery. * Infection: clinical signs of site infection or pus drainage at the wound that required the use of antibiotics. * Re-rupture: an ankle sprain event during the follow-up.
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool - CAIT (change)
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society - AOFAS (change)
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale - VAS (change)
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Foot Function Index - FFI (change)
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
36 Item Short Form Health Survey - SF36 (change)
3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arthroscopic Brostrom
EXPERIMENTALOpen Brostrom
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Brostrom-Gould lateral ligament ankle reconstruction performed by arthroscopic view
Brostrom-Gould lateral ligament ankle reconstruction performed by an open approach.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals must be older than 18 and younger than 65 years of age, both genders;
- Participants must be experiencing instability symptoms at the ankle over the last six months;
- Clinical diagnosis of ankle instability, defined as the presence of at least one previous ankle sprain associated with a current instability sensation by the patient and the presence of a positive anterior drawer test; the previous lateral ligament injury must be confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery involving the affected foot or ankle;
- History or documented evidence of autoimmune or peripheral vascular diseases;
- History or documented evidence of peripheral neuropathy (nervous compression syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome) or systemic inflammatory disease a (rheumatoid arthritis, spondylitis, Reiter Syndrome, etc.);
- Associated injuries, such as osteochondral lesions, tendon ruptures and fractures.
- Associated instability, such as syndesmotic and medial instability.
- Cavovarus foot;
- BMI over 35;
- Previous infiltration in the ankle over the six months preceding the initial assessment;
- Pregnancy;
- Any condition that represents a contraindication of the proposed therapies;
- Impossibility or incapacity to sign the informed Consent Form;
- History or documented evidence of blood coagulation disorders (including treatment with anti-coagulants, but excluding aspirin);
- Use of heart pacemaker;
- Presence of infectious process (superficial on skin and cellular tissue, or deep in the bone) in the region to be treated;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil
Federal University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04022-001, Brazil
Related Publications (33)
Yeo ED, Lee KT, Sung IH, Lee SG, Lee YK. Comparison of All-Inside Arthroscopic and Open Techniques for the Modified Brostrom Procedure for Ankle Instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Oct;37(10):1037-1045. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666508. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PMID: 27623732BACKGROUNDMcGovern RP, Martin RL. Managing ankle ligament sprains and tears: current opinion. Open Access J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 2;7:33-42. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S72334. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27042147BACKGROUNDGribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, Verhagen EA, Vicenzino BT, Wikstrom EA, Delahunt E. 2016 consensus statement of the International Ankle Consortium: prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(24):1493-1495. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096188. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PMID: 27259750BACKGROUNDDoherty C, Bleakley C, Hertel J, Caulfield B, Ryan J, Delahunt E. Recovery From a First-Time Lateral Ankle Sprain and the Predictors of Chronic Ankle Instability: A Prospective Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):995-1003. doi: 10.1177/0363546516628870. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
PMID: 26912285BACKGROUNDHamilton WG, Thompson FM, Snow SW. The modified Brostrom procedure for lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle. 1993 Jan;14(1):1-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400101.
PMID: 8425724BACKGROUNDKarlsson J, Bergsten T, Lansinger O, Peterson L. Surgical treatment of chronic lateral instability of the ankle joint. A new procedure. Am J Sports Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;17(2):268-73; discussion 273-4. doi: 10.1177/036354658901700220.
PMID: 2667383BACKGROUNDMesser TM, Cummins CA, Ahn J, Kelikian AS. Outcome of the modified Brostrom procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability using suture anchors. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Dec;21(12):996-1003. doi: 10.1177/107110070002101203.
PMID: 11139039BACKGROUNDPaden MH, Stone PA, McGarry JJ. Modified Brostrom lateral ankle stabilization utilizing an implantable anchoring system. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;33(6):617-22.
PMID: 7894411BACKGROUNDNery C, Raduan F, Del Buono A, Asaumi ID, Cohen M, Maffulli N. Arthroscopic-assisted Brostrom-Gould for chronic ankle instability: a long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2381-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511416069. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
PMID: 21803979BACKGROUNDCorte-Real NM, Moreira RM. Arthroscopic repair of chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Mar;30(3):213-7. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0213.
PMID: 19321097BACKGROUNDCottom JM, Rigby RB. The "all inside" arthroscopic Brostrom procedure: a prospective study of 40 consecutive patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):568-74. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 May 11.
PMID: 23669003BACKGROUNDMatsui K, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Innami K, Matsushita T. Arthroscopic Brostrom repair with Gould augmentation via an accessory anterolateral port for lateral instability of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Oct;134(10):1461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2049-x. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
PMID: 25015792BACKGROUNDMolloy AP, Ajis A, Kazi H. The modified Brostrom-Gould procedure--early results using a newly described surgical technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Sep;20(3):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PMID: 25103713BACKGROUNDAcevedo JI, Mangone P. Arthroscopic brostrom technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Apr;36(4):465-73. doi: 10.1177/1071100715576107. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PMID: 25743426BACKGROUNDMaffulli N, Del Buono A, Maffulli GD, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, Denaro V. Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Brostrom repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):858-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546512474967. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PMID: 23388673BACKGROUNDLi HY, Zheng JJ, Zhang J, Cai YH, Hua YH, Chen SY. The improvement of postural control in patients with mechanical ankle instability after lateral ankle ligaments reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1081-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3660-2. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26017745BACKGROUNDNery C, Fonseca L, Raduan F, Moreno M, Baumfeld D; ESSKA AFAS Ankle Instability Group. Prospective study of the " Inside-Out" arthroscopic ankle ligament technique: Preliminary result. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Aug;24(4):320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
PMID: 29409246BACKGROUNDRigby RB, Cottom JM. A comparison of the "All-Inside" arthroscopic Brostrom procedure with the traditional open modified Brostrom-Gould technique: A review of 62 patients. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Feb;25(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.642. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
PMID: 29409264BACKGROUNDParisien JS, Shereff MJ. The role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1981 Nov;2(3):144-9. doi: 10.1177/107110078100200304. No abstract available.
PMID: 7341388BACKGROUNDDrez D Jr, Guhl JF, Gollehon DL. Ankle arthroscopy: technique and indications. Foot Ankle. 1981 Nov;2(3):138-43. doi: 10.1177/107110078100200303. No abstract available.
PMID: 7341387BACKGROUNDGlazebrook MA, Ganapathy V, Bridge MA, Stone JW, Allard JP. Evidence-based indications for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2009 Dec;25(12):1478-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.001.
PMID: 19962076BACKGROUNDKerr HL, Bayley E, Jackson R, Kothari P. The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of functional instability of the ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Dec;19(4):273-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
PMID: 24095237BACKGROUNDEpstein DM, Black BS, Sherman SL. Anterior ankle arthroscopy: indications, pitfalls, and complications. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Mar;20(1):41-57. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
PMID: 25726482BACKGROUNDSchafer D, Hintermann B. Arthroscopic assessment of the chronic unstable ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(1):48-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01565998.
PMID: 8819064BACKGROUNDFerkel RD, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Fischer SP. Arthroscopic treatment of anterolateral impingement of the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):440-6. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900504.
PMID: 1962707BACKGROUNDOgilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart MK, Chorney K. Chronic pain following ankle sprains in athletes: the role of arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1997 Oct;13(5):564-74. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90181-x.
PMID: 9343643BACKGROUNDCameron SE, Wilson W, St Pierre P. A prospective, randomized comparison of open vs arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 1995 Mar;18(3):249-52. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19950301-06.
PMID: 7761314BACKGROUNDNoyes FR, Mangine RE, Barber S. Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):149-60. doi: 10.1177/036354658701500210.
PMID: 3555129BACKGROUNDHohmann E, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Open versus arthroscopic surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis over the past 20 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):1873-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
PMID: 28688936BACKGROUNDPulavarti RS, Symes TH, Rangan A. Surgical interventions for anterior shoulder instability in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD005077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005077.pub2.
PMID: 19821339BACKGROUNDCorella F, Del Cerro M, Ocampos M, Simon de Blas C, Larrainzar-Garijo R. Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction, Volar and Dorsal Reconstruction. Hand Clin. 2017 Nov;33(4):687-707. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.07.019.
PMID: 28991581BACKGROUNDShenoy K, Dai AZ, Mahure SA, Kaplan DJ, Capogna B, Youm T. Arthroscopic Repair of Hip Labrum With Suture Anchors. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Nov 13;6(6):e2143-e2149. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.007. eCollection 2017 Dec.
PMID: 29349010BACKGROUNDGuelfi M, Zamperetti M, Pantalone A, Usuelli FG, Salini V, Oliva XM. Open and arthroscopic lateral ligament repair for treatment of chronic ankle instability: A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Feb;24(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.315. Epub 2016 May 12.
PMID: 29413768BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marcel JS Tamaoki, PhD
Federal University Sao Paulo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Caio Nery, PhD
Federal University Sao Paulo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fabio Matsunaga, PhD
Federal University Sao Paulo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roberto Zambelli, MD
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2018
First Posted
August 23, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 5, 2027
Last Updated
September 27, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After statistical analysis closure.
- Access Criteria
- Registered researches that request access.
We intend to share all the IPD available.