NCT03428620

Brief Summary

Our purpose is to examine the combined effects of thrust mobilization of the ankle joints in conjunction with a six-week rehabilitation program on functional performance in subjects reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 17, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

February 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Functional PerformanceRehabilitationManipulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in baseline Figure-of-8 hop test at 6 weeks.

    The participant begins the test on either side of a demarcated 5-meter distance. While standing on the involved ankle, the participant is instructed to "hop on one foot, as fast as you can," twice around the figure 8. Two trials will be performed with the fastest time being recorded.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Side hop test at 6 weeks

    The participant stands on the involved limb on either side of two lines that are 30 cm apart. They are then instructed to "hop on one foot, as fast as you can," laterally and then back to the starting position. This is counted as two repetitions and 10 repetitions are performed. If the participant lands on or between the lines, this repetition does not count and they continue until 10 good repetitions are completed. Participants perform two trials and the fastest time is recorded.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) at 6 weeks

    Each participant is asked to maintain single-limb stance, with hands on their hips, while reaching in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Subscale at 6 weeks

    The FAAM- ADL is a 21-item tool that is designed to assess functional limitations related to foot and ankle conditions. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) and has total point value of 84 points, reported as a percent value.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Sport subscale at 6 weeks

    The FAAM- Sport is a 7-item tool that is a sub-scale of the FAAM. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) with a total point value of 28 points, reported as a percent value.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT) at 6 weeks

    12-item tool that rates the participant's overall perceived level of function. Each item is assigned a point value from 0 (much less than other ankle) to 4 (much more than other ankle) with a possible total value of 48 points.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in baseline Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) at 6 weeks.

    9-item questionnaire that helps discriminate and measure the severity of functional ankle instability.

    Baseline and 6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Mobilization

EXPERIMENTAL

High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilization group. The three joints that will be manipulated include proximal tibiofibular, the distal tibiofibular, and talocrural joints and will be mobilized the first three sessions prior to the participants performing the exercise protocol.

Other: High Velocity Low Amplitude mobilizationOther: Exercise protocol

Exercise Protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This exercise regimen is a modified version of the balance training program described by McKeon et al.

Other: Exercise protocol

Interventions

Mobilizations will be performed one time at each joint, prior to completing the exercise protocol during the first three treatment sessions.

Also known as: HVLA, thrust mobilization
Mobilization

This exercise regimen is a modified version of the balance training program described by McKeon et al.

Exercise ProtocolMobilization

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age
  • A history of at least 1 significant ankle sprain (The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study enrollment, associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, swelling, etc), created at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity)
  • The most recent injury must have occurred more than 3 months prior to study enrollment.
  • A history of the previously injured ankle joint "giving way" and/or recurrent sprain and/or "feelings of instability."
  • Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) \< 24
  • Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)42: ADL scale \< 90%, Sport scale \< 80%

You may not qualify if:

  • A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures (ie, bones, joint structures, nerves) in either limb of the lower extremity.
  • A history of a fracture in either limb of the lower extremity requiring realignment
  • Acute injury to musculoskeletal structures of other joints of the lower extremity in the previous 3 months, which impacted joint integrity and function (ie, sprains, fractures) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Methodist University

Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28311, United States

RECRUITING

Shenandoah University

Winchester, Virginia, 22601, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Caulfield B, Docherty CL, Fong DT, Fourchet F, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, van der Wees P, Vicenzino W, Wikstrom EA. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):121-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.14. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

    PMID: 24377963BACKGROUND
  • McKeon PO, Ingersoll CD, Kerrigan DC, Saliba E, Bennett BC, Hertel J. Balance training improves function and postural control in those with chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Oct;40(10):1810-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817e0f92.

    PMID: 18799992BACKGROUND
  • Hale SA, Hertel J, Olmsted-Kramer LC. The effect of a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program on postural control and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):303-11. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2322.

    PMID: 17612356BACKGROUND
  • Beazell JR, Grindstaff TL, Sauer LD, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. Effects of a proximal or distal tibiofibular joint manipulation on ankle range of motion and functional outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):125-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3729. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

    PMID: 22333567BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Cameron J Bolton, DPT

    Shenandoah University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sheri Hale, PhD, PT

    Shenandoah University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Cameron J Bolton, DPT

CONTACT

Sheri Hale, PhD, PT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor Division of Physical Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2018

First Posted

February 9, 2018

Study Start

February 14, 2018

Primary Completion

January 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2019

Last Updated

April 17, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations