Study Stopped
PI left institution and unable to find new PI
Efficacy Between Serratus Plane Block And Local Infiltration In Vats
Comparison Between Serratus Plane Block And Local Surgical Infiltration In Robotic Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery- A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is increasingly being used as it is a less invasive surgery compared to traditional methods, but the acute pain at an early stage after VATS has a major impact on perioperative outcomes. Effective post operative analgesia is believed to reduce morbidity, quicken recovery, improve patient outcome and reduce hospital costs. The site and extent of the incision influences the degree of pain due to disruption of intercostal nerves as well as inflammation of chest wall and pleura. Neuraxial and systemic opioids have been a gold standard as a part of multimodal analgesia for thoracic surgeries. Numerous modalities have been studied: thoracic paravertebral nerve blocks, thoracic epidural analgesia, intercostal nerve blocks, patient controlled analgesia (PCA), cryo-analgesia, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), inter-pleural blocks, stellate ganglion blocks, long thoracic nerve blocks, and infiltration under direct vision by the surgeon. Serratus plane block is an emerging regional technique that has proven to be effective in comparison to paravertebral blocks in patients undergoing breast surgery and mastectomy with reduced perioperative opioid consumption and improved pain scores. The lateral pectoral nerve, medial pectoral nerve, intercostal nerves and long thoracic nerve are all targets for the serratus plane block. It can be safely performed under ultrasound guidance. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the difference in quality of analgesia between efficacy of serratus plane block and local surgical infiltration by surgeon as measured by patient opioid consumption and pain scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 lung-cancer
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 lung-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2020
CompletedSeptember 30, 2020
September 1, 2020
10 months
August 20, 2018
August 3, 2020
September 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of Opioid Consumption
The amount of opioid consumption (in mg IV morphine equivalents) postoperatively up to 24 hours after the procedure.
up to 24 hours post procedure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to First Dose of Narcotic Administration
up to 24 hours post procedure
PACU Length of Stay
average 3-4 hours post procedure
ICU Length of Stay
up to 40 hours post procedure
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
up to 24 hours post procedure
Patient Satisfaction Score
up to 24 hours post procedure
Study Arms (2)
Serratus Plane Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to the group will receive a total 20cc of solution consisting of 0.5% bupivacaine with 133mg of liposomal bupivacaine injected in the serratus plane with the help of an ultrasound.
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients randomized to the group will receive a total 20cc of 133mg liposomal bupivacaine injected prior to skin closure at the incision site as per surgeon's practice.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I-IV
- age 81-75
You may not qualify if:
- ASA class V
- morbid obesity
- patient refusal
- patients with chronic pain or on pain medications
- allergy to LA
- patients receiving any additional regional techniques
- coagulopathy
- patients receiving systemic anticoagulation
- local infection
- procedures anticipated to last more than 5 hours.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital
New York, New York, 10019, United States
Mount Sinai West Hospital
New York, New York, 10019, United States
Related Publications (3)
Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.
PMID: 27543533BACKGROUNDBlanco R. The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):847-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21831090BACKGROUNDThoracic paravertebral block versus pectoral nerve block for analgesia after breast surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2013; 30: 129-135. Wahba, SS and Kamal, SM.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Poonam Pai
- Organization
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yan Lai, MD, MPH
cahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient, surgeon, and anesthesiologist in the case will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2018
First Posted
August 22, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
September 30, 2020
Results First Posted
August 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share