NCT03641196

Brief Summary

A deep bite is a bite where the upper front teeth cover almost all, if not all the lower front teeth. Currently there is no clarity which of the available treatment approaches is better when these patients still have some baby (deciduous) teeth in their mouths. This study will compare the results of four ways to manage this problem:

  1. 1.Delay treatment until all permanent teeth are erupted,
  2. 2.Temporary glue some brackets to the upper front teeth and correct the problem with orthodontic wires,
  3. 3.Temporary glue some dental material in the back of the front teeth to allow the back teeth to erupt.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2019

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 10, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Orthodontic AppliancesDentition, Mixed

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Elimination of the moderate to severe anterior deep bite

    The success in overbite correction (yes/no) will be defined as the complete dissolution of deep bite, with an overbite 3mm.

    The success rate was assessed by comparing study models from before (T0) and after treatment (T1)(no more than 12 months).

  • Measurement of overjet and overbite

    Measurement of overjet and overbite in millimeters, using a measured with a pencil and ruler. All measurements were made to the nearest 0.1 mm by an orthodontist.Obtained from digital bite models.

    Before (T0) and after treatment (T1) (no more than 12 months).

  • Arch length to incised edge

    Measurement of the arch length to incisal edge, in millimeters, using a measured with a pencil and ruler. All measurements were made to the nearest 0.1 mm by an orthodontist. Obtained from digital bite models.

    Before (T0) and after treatment (T1) (no more than 12 months).

  • Maxillary dental arch length total

    Measurement of the total maxillary dental arch length, in millimeters, using a measured with a pencil and ruler. All measurements were made to the nearest 0.1 mm by an orthodontist. Obtained from digital bite models.

    Before (T0) and after treatment (T1) (no more than 12 months).

  • Transverse maxillary molar distance

    Measurement of the transverse maxillary molar distance, in millimeters, using a measured with a pencil and ruler. All measurements were made to the nearest 0.1 mm by an orthodontist. Obtained from digital bite models.

    Before (T0) and after treatment (T1) (no more than 12 months).

  • Cephalometric analysis

    Cephalometric measures, including sagittal interdental, maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar measurements, will be collected for each participant. All these measurements will be combined on a final evaluation of craniofacial changes. Conventional 2-D Lateral cephalograms will be taken from all patients before treatment (T0) and at the end of the active intervention (T1). A trained and calibrated orthodontist, previously calibrated will perform the measurements.

    Before (T0) and after treatment (T1) (no more than 12 months).

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Treatment duration in months

    correction of deep bite up to a maximum of 12 months

  • Breakages

    12 months

  • Additional appointments

    12 months

  • Emergency appointments

    12 months

  • Compliance in the removable appliance group

    12 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

No treatment of deep bite

NO INTERVENTION

No treatment of deep bite. These participants will be evaluated during a 6-month follow-up period. In cases were significant problems arise during the follow-up period, the participant will be removed from the study and the appropriate treatment conducted.

Fixed appliance

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fixed appliance: Treatment with a cemented modified palatal Nance appliance presenting a bite-plane.

Device: Fixed appliance

Composite bite plane

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Composite bite plane: Treatment with a composite build up in the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors.

Procedure: Composite bite plane

Interventions

Use of a cemented modified palatal Nance appliance presenting a bite-plane

Fixed appliance

treatment with a composite build up in the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors.

Composite bite plane

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • presence of moderate to severe deep bite (overbite, \>5.0 mm);
  • fully erupted maxillary and mandibular incisors, as well as first permanent molars.

You may not qualify if:

  • missing permanent incisors and molars;
  • clinically noticeable craniofacial syndromes;
  • need for immediate intervention to assess severe sagittal, transversal or vertical malocclusions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Orthodontic clinic at the University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Huang GJ, Bates SB, Ehlert AA, Whiting DP, Chen SS, Bollen AM. Stability of deep-bite correction: A systematic review. J World Fed Orthod. 2012 Sep 1;1(3):e89-e86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2012.09.001.

    PMID: 23630651BACKGROUND
  • Feldmann I, Lundstrom F, Peck S. Occlusal changes from adolescence to adulthood in untreated patients with Class II Division 1 deepbite malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):33-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)0692.3.CO;2.

    PMID: 10022182BACKGROUND
  • de Souza BS, Bichara LM, Guerreiro JF, Quintao CC, Normando D. Occlusal and facial features in Amazon indigenous: An insight into the role of genetics and environment in the etiology dental malocclusion. Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Sep;60(9):1177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 21.

    PMID: 26051559BACKGROUND
  • Ferro R, Besostri A, Olivieri A, Stellini E. Prevalence of occlusal traits and orthodontic treatment need in 14 year-old adolescents in Northeast Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Mar;17(1):36-42.

    PMID: 26949237BACKGROUND
  • Lux CJ, Ducker B, Pritsch M, Komposch G, Niekusch U. Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9-year-old schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Jun;31(3):294-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn116. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

    PMID: 19244457BACKGROUND
  • Silness J, Roynstrand T. Effects of the degree of overbite and overjet on dental health. J Clin Periodontol. 1985 May;12(5):389-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1985.tb00929.x.

    PMID: 3859497BACKGROUND
  • Bergersen EO. A longitudinal study of anterior vertical overbite from eight to twenty years of age. Angle Orthod. 1988 Jul;58(3):237-56. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1988)0582.0.CO;2.

    PMID: 3189955BACKGROUND
  • Grippaudo C, Pantanali F, Paolantonio EG, Saulle R, Latorre G, Deli R. Orthodontic treatment timing in growing patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Sep;14(3):231-6.

    PMID: 24295010BACKGROUND
  • Baccetti T, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Vangelisti A, Defraia E. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.024.

    PMID: 22748993BACKGROUND
  • Hellsing E. Increased overbite and craniomandibular disorders--a clinical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Dec;98(6):516-22. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70018-8.

    PMID: 2248230BACKGROUND
  • Franchi L, Baccetti T, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Vangelisti A, Defraia E. Outcomes of two-phase orthodontic treatment of deepbite malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):945-52. doi: 10.2319/033011-229.1. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

    PMID: 21801005BACKGROUND
  • Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in subjects with deepbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.015.

    PMID: 21803258BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Overbite

Interventions

Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Malocclusion, Angle Class IIMalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Orthodontic AppliancesOrthodonticsDentistry

Study Officials

  • Carlos Flores-Mir, PhD

    University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The analyses will be blinded regarding treatment received and time.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study will be a stratified, parallel randomized controlled, single-blinded, with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2018

First Posted

August 21, 2018

Study Start

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion

September 10, 2021

Study Completion

September 10, 2021

Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations