Single-session tDCS in Cerebral Palsy
Effects of Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children With Cerebral Palsy
3 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to characterize individual responses to a single application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), and to test which electrode configuration produces changes in brain excitability and motor function. Participants with UCP, ages 7-21 years, will be assigned to one of four tDCS groups. Using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, the investigators will assess cortical excitability before and at regular intervals up to 1 hour following tDCS. The knowledge gained from this study will advance the field through more targeted approaches of neuromodulatory techniques in this population and others, using individual characteristics to guide optimal treatment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 21, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2021
CompletedApril 13, 2021
March 1, 2021
1.8 years
July 12, 2018
February 3, 2021
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude
Motor evoked potential is a measure of cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP is measured as the amplitude of electrical activity from finger muscles. Outcome is reported as the percent change in MEP amplitude from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.
approximately 5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Movement Accuracy
Approximately 1 hours
Study Arms (4)
Anodal ipsilesional Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTALAnodal tDCS (excitatory) applied to the lesioned hemisphere. Participant must have lesioned hemisphere MEP.
Cathodal contralesional Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTALCathodal tDCS (inhibitory) applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere. Participant must have lesioned hemisphere MEP.
Anodal contralesional Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTALAnodal tDCS (excitatory) applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere. Participant must not have lesioned hemisphere MEP.
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORSham tDCS applied in one of the above configurations
Interventions
Low-level (1.5 milliampere) current delivered to the scalp using saline-soaked sponges.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 7-21
- Able to follow two-step commands.
- Presence of an MEP in the non-lesioned hemisphere
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of seizure within 2 years
- Other neurological or metabolic conditions
- Is pregnant (females only)
- Presence of indwelling metal in the head (e.g. aneurysm clip) or medical device.
- Clinical diagnosis of unilateral cerebral palsy
- Radiological evidence of stroke or periventricular leukomalacia
- Treatment with injectable agents (e.g. Botox) for spasticity management within 2 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samuel Nemanich
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Related Publications (21)
Christensen D, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS, Maenner MJ, Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Wingate MS, Fitzgerald R, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Prevalence of cerebral palsy, co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, and motor functioning - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, USA, 2008. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12268. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
PMID: 24117446BACKGROUNDBolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif LA, El-Nazer R, Williams J, Banco E, Macea DD, Tesio L, Chessa C, Fregni F. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(9):819-29. doi: 10.1177/1545968311411056. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
PMID: 21803933BACKGROUNDFiglewski K, Blicher JU, Mortensen J, Severinsen KE, Nielsen JF, Andersen H. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Potentiates Improvements in Functional Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):229-232. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014988. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PMID: 27899754BACKGROUNDAntal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, Paulus W. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Nov;26(9):2687-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05896.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
PMID: 17970738BACKGROUNDDuque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.033. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
PMID: 16084737BACKGROUNDMurase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):400-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.10848.
PMID: 14991818BACKGROUNDZewdie E, Damji O, Ciechanski P, Seeger T, Kirton A. Contralesional Corticomotor Neurophysiology in Hemiparetic Children With Perinatal Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):261-271. doi: 10.1177/1545968316680485. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
PMID: 27885162BACKGROUNDKirton A, Deveber G, Gunraj C, Chen R. Cortical excitability and interhemispheric inhibition after subcortical pediatric stroke: plastic organization and effects of rTMS. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;121(11):1922-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.021.
PMID: 20537584BACKGROUNDCollange Grecco LA, de Almeida Carvalho Duarte N, Mendonca ME, Galli M, Fregni F, Oliveira CS. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with virtual reality for improving gait in children with spastic diparetic cerebral palsy: a pilot, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1212-23. doi: 10.1177/0269215514566997. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
PMID: 25604912BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.
PMID: 11723286BACKGROUNDGillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, Rich TL, Moberg K, Thomas W, Cassidy JM, Menk J, Carey JR. Primed low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12243. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23962321BACKGROUNDKirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, Gunraj C, Pontigon AM, Deveber G. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70096-6. Epub 2008 May 1.
PMID: 18455961BACKGROUNDCiechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.
PMID: 27166171BACKGROUNDKirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):259-267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
PMID: 27927938BACKGROUNDBikson M, Grossman P, Zannou AL, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Response to letter to the editor: Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):986-987. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 28734680BACKGROUNDGiacobbe V, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Pascual-Leone A, Rykman A, Zeiarati G, Fregni F, Dipietro L, Thickbroom GW, Edwards DJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):49-56. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130927.
PMID: 23949028BACKGROUNDLazzari RD, Politti F, Santos CA, Dumont AJ, Rezende FL, Grecco LA, Braun Ferreira LA, Oliveira CS. Effect of a single session of transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with virtual reality training on the balance of children with cerebral palsy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):763-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.763. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PMID: 25931726BACKGROUNDGillick BT, Feyma T, Menk J, Usset M, Vaith A, Wood TJ, Worthington R, Krach LE. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study. Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):337-49. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130565. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25413621BACKGROUNDAntal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
PMID: 28709880BACKGROUNDKrishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, Ehinger M. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
PMID: 25499471BACKGROUNDGillick B, Rich T, Nemanich S, Chen CY, Menk J, Mueller B, Chen M, Ward M, Meekins G, Feyma T, Krach L, Rudser K. Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 May;22(3):358-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
PMID: 29456128BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bernadette Gillick
- Organization
- University of Wisconsin Madison
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and families will be masked to intervention group. The research team members performing assessments will be masked to intervention group.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2018
First Posted
August 17, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 21, 2020
Study Completion
February 21, 2020
Last Updated
April 13, 2021
Results First Posted
February 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share