NCT03635775

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to characterize individual responses to a single application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), and to test which electrode configuration produces changes in brain excitability and motor function. Participants with UCP, ages 7-21 years, will be assigned to one of four tDCS groups. Using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, the investigators will assess cortical excitability before and at regular intervals up to 1 hour following tDCS. The knowledge gained from this study will advance the field through more targeted approaches of neuromodulatory techniques in this population and others, using individual characteristics to guide optimal treatment

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 21, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 25, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 12, 2018

Results QC Date

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

non-invasive brain stimulationrehabilitationpediatrics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude

    Motor evoked potential is a measure of cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP is measured as the amplitude of electrical activity from finger muscles. Outcome is reported as the percent change in MEP amplitude from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.

    approximately 5 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Movement Accuracy

    Approximately 1 hours

Study Arms (4)

Anodal ipsilesional Active tDCS

EXPERIMENTAL

Anodal tDCS (excitatory) applied to the lesioned hemisphere. Participant must have lesioned hemisphere MEP.

Device: Active tDCS

Cathodal contralesional Active tDCS

EXPERIMENTAL

Cathodal tDCS (inhibitory) applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere. Participant must have lesioned hemisphere MEP.

Device: Active tDCS

Anodal contralesional Active tDCS

EXPERIMENTAL

Anodal tDCS (excitatory) applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere. Participant must not have lesioned hemisphere MEP.

Device: Active tDCS

Sham tDCS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham tDCS applied in one of the above configurations

Device: Sham tDCS

Interventions

Low-level (1.5 milliampere) current delivered to the scalp using saline-soaked sponges.

Also known as: transcranial direct current stimulation
Anodal contralesional Active tDCSAnodal ipsilesional Active tDCSCathodal contralesional Active tDCS
Sham tDCSDEVICE

Sham-setting--no electrical current delivered.

Sham tDCS

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages 7-21
  • Able to follow two-step commands.
  • Presence of an MEP in the non-lesioned hemisphere

You may not qualify if:

  • Evidence of seizure within 2 years
  • Other neurological or metabolic conditions
  • Is pregnant (females only)
  • Presence of indwelling metal in the head (e.g. aneurysm clip) or medical device.
  • Clinical diagnosis of unilateral cerebral palsy
  • Radiological evidence of stroke or periventricular leukomalacia
  • Treatment with injectable agents (e.g. Botox) for spasticity management within 2 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Samuel Nemanich

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Christensen D, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS, Maenner MJ, Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Wingate MS, Fitzgerald R, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Prevalence of cerebral palsy, co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, and motor functioning - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, USA, 2008. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12268. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

    PMID: 24117446BACKGROUND
  • Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif LA, El-Nazer R, Williams J, Banco E, Macea DD, Tesio L, Chessa C, Fregni F. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(9):819-29. doi: 10.1177/1545968311411056. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

    PMID: 21803933BACKGROUND
  • Figlewski K, Blicher JU, Mortensen J, Severinsen KE, Nielsen JF, Andersen H. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Potentiates Improvements in Functional Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):229-232. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014988. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27899754BACKGROUND
  • Antal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, Paulus W. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Nov;26(9):2687-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05896.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.

    PMID: 17970738BACKGROUND
  • Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.033. Epub 2005 Aug 9.

    PMID: 16084737BACKGROUND
  • Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):400-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.10848.

    PMID: 14991818BACKGROUND
  • Zewdie E, Damji O, Ciechanski P, Seeger T, Kirton A. Contralesional Corticomotor Neurophysiology in Hemiparetic Children With Perinatal Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):261-271. doi: 10.1177/1545968316680485. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

    PMID: 27885162BACKGROUND
  • Kirton A, Deveber G, Gunraj C, Chen R. Cortical excitability and interhemispheric inhibition after subcortical pediatric stroke: plastic organization and effects of rTMS. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;121(11):1922-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.021.

    PMID: 20537584BACKGROUND
  • Collange Grecco LA, de Almeida Carvalho Duarte N, Mendonca ME, Galli M, Fregni F, Oliveira CS. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with virtual reality for improving gait in children with spastic diparetic cerebral palsy: a pilot, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1212-23. doi: 10.1177/0269215514566997. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

    PMID: 25604912BACKGROUND
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.

    PMID: 11723286BACKGROUND
  • Gillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, Rich TL, Moberg K, Thomas W, Cassidy JM, Menk J, Carey JR. Primed low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12243. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

    PMID: 23962321BACKGROUND
  • Kirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, Gunraj C, Pontigon AM, Deveber G. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70096-6. Epub 2008 May 1.

    PMID: 18455961BACKGROUND
  • Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.

    PMID: 27166171BACKGROUND
  • Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):259-267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

    PMID: 27927938BACKGROUND
  • Bikson M, Grossman P, Zannou AL, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Response to letter to the editor: Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):986-987. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 12. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28734680BACKGROUND
  • Giacobbe V, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Pascual-Leone A, Rykman A, Zeiarati G, Fregni F, Dipietro L, Thickbroom GW, Edwards DJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):49-56. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130927.

    PMID: 23949028BACKGROUND
  • Lazzari RD, Politti F, Santos CA, Dumont AJ, Rezende FL, Grecco LA, Braun Ferreira LA, Oliveira CS. Effect of a single session of transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with virtual reality training on the balance of children with cerebral palsy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):763-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.763. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PMID: 25931726BACKGROUND
  • Gillick BT, Feyma T, Menk J, Usset M, Vaith A, Wood TJ, Worthington R, Krach LE. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study. Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):337-49. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130565. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

    PMID: 25413621BACKGROUND
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

    PMID: 28709880BACKGROUND
  • Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, Ehinger M. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

    PMID: 25499471BACKGROUND
  • Gillick B, Rich T, Nemanich S, Chen CY, Menk J, Mueller B, Chen M, Ward M, Meekins G, Feyma T, Krach L, Rudser K. Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 May;22(3):358-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 11.

    PMID: 29456128BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyLeukomalacia, Periventricular

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersEncephalomalaciaVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Bernadette Gillick
Organization
University of Wisconsin Madison

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and families will be masked to intervention group. The research team members performing assessments will be masked to intervention group.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Posted

August 17, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion

February 21, 2020

Study Completion

February 21, 2020

Last Updated

April 13, 2021

Results First Posted

February 25, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations