Comparison of Pantoprazole and Ranitidine in Dyspepsia
Intravenous Pantoprazole vs Ranitidine in Dyspepsia in Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The H0 hypothesis of the study is there is no difference between pantoprazole and ranitidine in treating patients presented with dyspepsia to the emergency department. The H1 hypothesis is there is difference between pantoprazole and ranitidine in treating patients presented with dyspepsia to the emergency department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2015
CompletedJuly 23, 2015
June 1, 2015
3 months
November 24, 2012
March 16, 2015
June 27, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale Score
The investigators are measuring the change of pain from the baseline to the 30th and 60th minutes by visual anologue scale (VAS). Visual Analogue Scale measurement is between 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst pain). A decrease of 13 or 16 mm in VAS score is accepted as a minimum clinically significant change in pain.
30th and 60th minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Need for Additional Drug
60 th minute
Study Arms (2)
pantoprazole
EXPERIMENTALIntravenous pantoprazole 40 mg flacon
ranitidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous ranitidine 50 mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Epigastric pain
- Older than 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed as cholecystitis, pancreatitis, myocardial infarction, etc.. at the end of the emergency deparment evaluation period.
- Pregnancy
- Patients with unstable vital signs
- Patients used anti-acid, H2 receptor blockers and proton pomp inhibitors in the last one hour.
- Allergy to H2 receptor blockers and proton pomp inhibitors.
- Patients denied to give inform consent and who are illiterate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz University
Antalya, 07050, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Welling LR, Watson WA. The emergency department treatment of dyspepsia with antacids and oral lidocaine. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;19(7):785-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81704-4.
PMID: 2202240BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cenker Eken
- Organization
- Akdeniz University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cenker Eken, Proffesor
Akdeniz University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2012
First Posted
November 30, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 23, 2015
Results First Posted
July 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06