Effects of E-cigarette Flavors on Youth TCORS 2.0
2 other identifiers
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is an examination of the influence of sweet and cooling flavors on the appeal and abuse potential of nicotine-containing e-cigarettes among susceptible youth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Nov 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
July 1, 2024
7 months
August 13, 2018
June 13, 2024
July 15, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Liking: Difference Score in Liking/Wanting of Each E-cigarette Condition
The Labeled Hedonic Scale will be used to ask about liking and wanting of the e-cigarette (one item Visual Analog Scale with ratings ranging from "most disliked sensation imaginable" to "most liked sensation imaginable" with higher values indicating greater liking). Specific scale semantic structure and corresponding values: most disliked imaginable=-100, dislike extremely=-62.9, dislike very much=-41.6, dislike moderately=-17.6, dislike slightly=-5.9, neutral=0, like slightly=6.3, like moderately=17.8, like very much=44.4, like extremely=65.7, most liked imaginable=100.
Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Reinforcing Efficacy: Difference Score in Drug Effects of Each E-cigarette Condition
Difference between e-cigarette effects for each e-cigarette condition as measured by the computerized version of the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ). Participants will self-report their responses using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. A modified version of the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) will be used in which participants rate acute responses to the e-cigarette on a 0-100mm scale from "not at all" (0mm) to "extremely" (100mm). Higher values indicate stronger reinforcing efficacy (i.e., wanting/liking effects).
Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Craving: Change in Craving Score for E-cigarette
Difference from baseline in craving for each e-cigarette condition will be measured by the Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Participants will self-report their craving for e-cigarettes using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. The Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scales (gLMS) are category ratio scales with seven semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically as per empirically determined semantic magnitudes on a 0-100 scale (strongest imaginable at the 100 end).
At baseline (+0 minutes), Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Irritation/Harshness: Difference Score in Irritation of Harshness of Each E-cigarette Condition
Difference in irritation at each e-cigarette condition as measured by the computerized Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Participants will self-report their responses using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. The Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scales (gLMS) are category ratio scales with seven semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically as per empirically determined semantic magnitudes on a 0-100 scale (strongest imaginable at the 100 end).
Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Study Arms (2)
Sweet non-menthol, nicotine 36mg/ml
EXPERIMENTALSweet flavor non-menthol (Watermelon) with 36mg/ml Nicotine
Sweet menthol, nicotine 36mg/ml
EXPERIMENTALSweet flavor with menthol (Watermelon-menthol) with 36mg/ml Nicotine
Interventions
Flavor of e-liquid - sweet or tobacco
Nicotine level (36 mg/ml)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18-20 years
- Able to read and write
- Used e-cigs at least 10 times in lifetime
- Used e-cigs in past 30 days
You may not qualify if:
- Current use of non-prescription substances besides nicotine, marijuana, alcohol
- Any significant current medical or psychiatric condition
- Known hypersensitivity to propylene glycol
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Uncontrolled asthma
- Nut/e-liquid flavorant allergy
- current marijuana (tetrahydrocannabinol) vaping + E-cigarette or vaping use Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) symptoms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
CMHC, Substance Abuse Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Related Publications (2)
Lim J, Wood A, Green BG. Derivation and evaluation of a labeled hedonic scale. Chem Senses. 2009 Nov;34(9):739-51. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp054.
PMID: 19833660BACKGROUNDLi W, Davis DR, Wu R, Gueorguieva R, Green BG, Krishnan-Sarin S. The effect of "ice" components in sweet-flavored nicotine-containing e-liquids among young adult e-cigarette users. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Oct;33(5):477-482. doi: 10.1037/pha0000786. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
PMID: 40489161DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
- Organization
- Yale University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, PhD
Yale University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Flavor and nicotine concentration is blinded to participant. Research staff and investigators are blinded to flavor order administer to participants.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2018
First Posted
August 17, 2018
Study Start
November 7, 2022
Primary Completion
June 16, 2023
Study Completion
July 20, 2023
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Results First Posted
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07