Improving Communication About Pain and Opioids
A Clinician Training Intervention to Improve Pain-related Communication, Pain Management and Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care
3 other identifiers
interventional
48
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The overall goal of this protocol is to pilot test a clinician training intervention that uses standardized patients (trained actors playing patient roles) as instructors who impart communication skills to primary care clinicians. This project will conduct a pilot clinical trial of the intervention developed by the primary investigator in order to evaluate intervention feasibility and generate data to plan a subsequent fully-powered, multisite trial. Primary care clinicians will be randomized to receive either the intervention or control; 48 patients (2 per clinician) will then be recorded during clinic visits with study clinicians and will provide data on post-visit perceptions and health outcomes. Study hypotheses are that visits with clinicians who receive the intervention (versus control) will be associated with more frequent use of targeted communication skills, lower probability of high-risk opioid prescribing, higher patient-reported agreement with treatment plan, and lower pain interference 2 months later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2020
CompletedNovember 12, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.8 years
July 31, 2018
November 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinician use of targeted communication skills
Compare frequency of use of targeted communication skills for residents in the Intervention vs Control arm (using coding of recorded visits to assess skill use)
Over a 3-9 month period (depending on how soon after the intervention clinicians' appointments with patient participants can be scheduled).
Compare efficacy of Control vs Intervention by measuring changes in the way pain interfered with patients lives using the Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference subscale survey
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference subscale consists of 7 categories relating to how pain interferes with patients lives. Patients are asked to rate their pain on a zero (Does Not Interfere) to 10 (Completely Interferes) scale. The 7 categories are: 1. General Activity, 2. Mood, 3. Walking Ability, 4. Work, 5. Relationships, 6. Sleep, 7. Enjoyment of life. Results are averaged to give an overall interference rating
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Compare efficacy of Control vs Intervention by measuring changes in the severity of patients pain using the Brief Pain Inventory - (Short Form) Pain Severity subscale which measures the severity of the patient's pain.
8 weeks
Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire
Over a 3-9 month period (depending on how soon after the intervention clinicians' appointments with patient participants can be scheduled).
Patient experience score
8 weeks
Physicians' overall appraisal of the standardized patient Intervention
1-3 months
Change in physician communication self efficacy
Over 3-9 month period (depending on how soon after the intervention clinicians' appointments with patient participants can be scheduled).
Other Outcomes (1)
High-risk opioid prescribing
Over 3-9 month period (depending on how soon after the intervention clinicians' appointments with patient participants can be scheduled).
Study Arms (2)
Communication skills training
EXPERIMENTALIntervention clinicians will receive 2 standardized patient visits. The first visit will consist of an 8 minute video on the development of 5 key communication skills, a 10-12 minute role-play session to practice using these skills, and 8-10 minutes of constructive feedback. The 2nd visit will include only the role-play and feedback components. Clinicians will also get a printed pocket card and pamphlet explaining the targeted communication skills in more detail.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl clinicians will receive a written summary of the 2016 CDC opioid prescribing guidelines, which include recommendations for best practices for use of opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain. CDC guidelines will serve as an attention control.
Interventions
Intervention components include an 8-10 minute instructional video, a pocket card and pamphlet, and 2 standardized patient visits with role-play and feedback by the standardized patient
Physician will review materials based on CDC opioid prescribing guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Internal Medicine or Family Medicine residents at UC Davis:
- completed ≥1 year of training
- see primary care patients in the Ambulatory Care Center (ACC) building. Clinicians will be recruited through clinic huddles, emails, and presentations at meetings.
- UC Davis Patients:
- years old
- taking opioids (≥1 opioid dose per day) prescribed by their primary care physician for \>90 days to treat chronic musculoskeletal pain
- have an appointment scheduled with a participating clinician at which they report they are likely to discuss pain management
You may not qualify if:
- active cancer
- hospice
- do not speak English
- prisoners
- pregnant women
- unable to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of California Davis Family Medicine Clinic
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
University of California Davis Internal Medicine Clinic
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen G Henry, MD
University of California, Davis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Physicians will be randomized after physician recruitment is complete. This ensures that arm assignment does not impact physicians' decision to participate. Arm assignment will be done using a random number generator. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding participants (physicians) is not feasible. However, patients will not be aware of their physician's arm assignment.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2018
First Posted
August 14, 2018
Study Start
October 31, 2017
Primary Completion
August 8, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2020
Last Updated
November 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share