NCT03626623

Brief Summary

This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) primarily aimed at determining if application of Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer intervention to diabetic foot ulcers shows improved wound closure rates when compared to standard care intervention.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 21, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 18, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 15, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 25, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 12, 2018

Results QC Date

January 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

DiabetesFoot Ulcer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Wounds With Wound Closure

    The primary endpoint of the study is to measure the incidence of complete wound closure (defined as 100% epithelialization) between randomized groups. Number of wounds was calculated as the total across all participants.

    up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Wound Size Change

    up to 12 weeks

  • Complete Wound Closure Time

    up to 12 weeks

  • Wound Recurrence

    at 26 week visit and 52 week visit

  • Short Form-20 (SF-20)

    Baseline visit, visit #7, visit #13, 26 wk. visit, and 52 wk.visit

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale- Short Form (DFS-SF)

    Baseline visit, 26 week visit, and 52 week visit

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard of Care (SOC)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The usual care a licensed health care provider would give patients to treat diabetic foot ulcers or wounds.

Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The application of the Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer device according to the Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer instructions for use (IFU).

Device: Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer

Interventions

Cytal® Wound Matrix 1-Layer is composed of a porcine (pig) derived extracellular matrix known as urinary bladder matrix. It is intended for the management of a variety of wounds.The individual device is intended for one time use.

Cytal Wound Matrix 1-Layer

Standard of care (SOC) is defined as the usual care a licensed health care provider would give patients to treat diabetic foot ulcers or wounds. SOC associated procedures and policies may vary across clinical settings.

Standard of Care (SOC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form by subject or legally authorized representative.
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study. Subject is able and willing to tolerate non-removable offloading device for the duration of the run-in and intervention phases of the study.
  • Subject is male or female and at least 21years of age.
  • Subject has a clinical diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
  • Subject's current foot ulcer(s) has been present for \> 30 days and ≤ 365 days.
  • Subject's current foot ulcer(s), post-debridement is/are predominantly below the malleoli and on the plantar surface of the foot.
  • Subject's foot ulcer(s) must be Wagner type 1 or type 2.
  • Post debridement, subject's ulcer(s) are free of necrotic debris and appear to be comprised of healthy, vascularized tissue.
  • All qualifying ulcers are ≥ 5cm away from any other ulcer on the same foot.
  • Subject's ulcer(s) is ≥ 1cm2 and ≤ 20cm2 at randomization (length x width).
  • Subject's HbA1C reading is ≤10%.
  • Subject's Serum Creatinine ≤ 3.0mg/dL.
  • Subject has adequate circulation to the foot as measured by Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) ≥ 0.7.
  • Negative pregnancy test at randomization for women.

You may not qualify if:

  • An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • Subject is pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study, if applicable.
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to materials in porcine-based study products (per subject report) or personal preference.
  • Subject report of concurrent participation in another clinical trial that involves a drug.
  • Subject has clinical evidence of gangrene on any part of the affected foot.
  • The subject's ulcer(s) is/are due to a non-diabetic etiology, ulcers of arterial, venous stasis, pressure, radiation, traumatic, rheumatoid, vasculitis, collagen vascular disease, or other non-diabetic etiologies.
  • Subject has unstable Charcot foot, Charcot foot with a bony prominence(s) or Charcot amputation.
  • Qualifying wound(s) is connected to another ulcer via a fistula.
  • Subject has one or more medical condition(s) including: renal, hepatic, hematological, neurologic, or immune disease that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the subject an inappropriate candidate for this wound healing study.
  • Subject has or has had a malignant disease (other than basal cell carcinoma) that has not been in remission for at least five years.
  • Subject is receiving oral or parenteral corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents, or is anticipated to require such during the course of the study.
  • Subject has acute osteomyelitis of the affected foot.
  • Subject's ulcer(s) is accompanied by active cellulitis.
  • Subject has received growth factor or enzymatic therapy within 2 weeks of consent.
  • Subject is currently receiving or has received radiation, radiologic implants, or chemotherapy.
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Limb Preservation Platform, Inc.

Fresno, California, 93710, United States

Location

Louisiana State University Health Science Center (LSUHSC)

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

MedStar Health Research Institute

Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Chen YH, DeMets DL, Lan KK. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising. Stat Med. 2004 Apr 15;23(7):1023-38. doi: 10.1002/sim.1688.

    PMID: 15057876BACKGROUND
  • Dumville JC, O'Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K. Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 12;2013(7):CD009101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009101.pub3.

    PMID: 23846869BACKGROUND
  • Wu L, Norman G, Dumville JC, O'Meara S, Bell-Syer SE. Dressings for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD010471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010471.pub2.

    PMID: 26171906BACKGROUND
  • Bann CM, Fehnel SE, Gagnon DD. Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF). Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(17):1277-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321170-00004.

    PMID: 14986739BACKGROUND
  • Yazdanpanah L, Nasiri M, Adarvishi S. Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer. World J Diabetes. 2015 Feb 15;6(1):37-53. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.37.

    PMID: 25685277BACKGROUND
  • Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons NB. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):651-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2176. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

    PMID: 24186882BACKGROUND
  • Margolis DJ, Kantor J, Berlin JA. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):692-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.692.

    PMID: 10332667BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Foot Ulcer

Interventions

Standard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetic NeuropathiesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesFoot Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Limitations and Caveats

Due to early termination, additional primary and secondary endpoint analyses were not performed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Allison Matthews
Organization
Integra LifeSciences

Study Officials

  • Allison Matthews

    Integra LifeSciences

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2018

First Posted

August 13, 2018

Study Start

May 21, 2019

Primary Completion

February 18, 2020

Study Completion

February 18, 2020

Last Updated

August 25, 2021

Results First Posted

February 15, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations