Mirror Therapy with Cutaneous Electrical Sensory Stimulation on Lower Limb Motor Functions in Stroke
Effect of Mirror Therapy with Cutaneous Electrical Sensory Stimulation on Lower Limb Motor Functions in People with Stroke: a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent mirror therapy (MT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in augmenting the efficacy of the lower limb task-oriented training in people with stroke. It is hypothesize that MT combined with TENS would be superior to sham-mirror therapy with TENS, or MT with placebo-TENS, or control training only in improving lower limb motor functions and walking ability in people with stroke when combined with the lower limb task-oriented training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
October 1, 2024
6.9 years
July 10, 2018
October 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE)
FMA-LE is used to evaluate the lower extremity motor control, including reflexes, voluntary control of isolated movement and coordination. The scale score ranging from 0 to 34, with 17 items and ordinal scoring from 0 to 2. A higher score indicates a better lower extremity motor control. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (4 weeks), post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up (20 weeks).
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The Change of Paretic ankle dorsiflexor strength
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Paretic ankle plantarflexor strength
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of 10-m walk test
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Timed 'Up and Go' test
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
The Change of Lower-extremity motor co-ordination test
Baseline (0 week), Mid-intervention (4 weeks), Post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month follow-up (20 weeks)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
MT + TENS
EXPERIMENTALThe subject will adopt a semi-seated position on a bed while the mirror board is positioned between the legs perpendicular to the subject's midline. The paretic leg will be positioned behind the mirror, with the intact leg facing the reflective surface. All subjects will be reminded to focus on the image in the mirror during MT training. All subjects will receive concurrent TENS stimulation over the common peroneal nerve while practising bilateral lower limb exercises. After 15 minutes of priming with TENS + MT, all subjects will perform 60 minutes of lower limb task-oriented training.
Placebo-MT+TENS
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn the Placebo-MT+TENS group, the experimental set-up and protocol will be the same as in the MT+TENS group, except that the reflecting surface of the angle-adjustable mirror was covered with paper. After 15 minutes of priming, all subjects will perform 60 minutes of lower limb task-oriented training.
MT+placebo-TENS
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn the MT+placebo-TENS group, the experimental set-up and protocol will be the same as in the MT+TENS group. The only difference is that placebo stimulation will be applied to the paretic limb from identical-looking TENS devices with the electrical circuit disconnected inside. After 15 minutes of priming, all subjects will perform 60 minutes of lower limb task-oriented training.
control training
SHAM COMPARATORAll subjects will perform 60 minutes of lower limb task-oriented training only.
Interventions
A customised angle-adjustable frame with a mirror board (60 Ă— 90 cm) will be used. All subjects are instructed to perform hip flexion/abduction, knee flexion/extension and ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion on the intact-limb during a 15 minutes period.
TENS will be delivered to the common peroneal nerve of the paretic leg. The stimulation frequency will be 100Hz and with an intensity just below the motor threshold.
The lower-limb task-oriented training comprises 6 exercises, namely stepping up and down, heel lift a dorsiflexed position, partial squatting, kicking a ball with alternate legs, gait re-education and transition training. Each exercise last for 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have had a single stroke with ischemic brain injury or intracerebral haemorrhage diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography within the previous 6 to 36 months;
- have at least 5 degrees of active ankle dorsiflexion in the antigravity position;
- are able to walk 10 m independently with or without a walking aid;
- are able to score 6 or higher out of 10 on the abbreviated mental test;
- have no unilateral neglect, hemianopia or apraxia;
- have no skin allergy (e.g. redness or itchiness to the electrical stimulation pads) to electrical stimulation or electrodes; and
- are able to follow instructions and give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- have any additional medical, cardiovascular or orthopaedic condition that would hinder proper treatment or assessment;
- have visual deficits that may hinder them from benefiting from the mirror visual feedback;
- have receptive dysphasia; or
- are involved in drug studies or other clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SSM Ng, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2018
First Posted
August 9, 2018
Study Start
July 2, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10