NCT03622073

Brief Summary

It is estimated that 47,000 women die every year due to consequences of unsafe abortion globally. The majority of pregnancy related deaths occur in low income countries where induced abortion is restricted, unmet need for contraception is high, and women's status is low. Uganda has a high total fertility rate of 5.4 children per woman, low contraceptive prevalence rate of 39%, and more than half of these pregnancies are unintended. Induced abortion is controversial and restricted in Uganda and legally permitted only to save a woman's life. As a result, women often resort to unsafe abortion- that's either performed by a person lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards. Of the estimated 314,304 women who undergo unsafe abortions each year in Uganda, about 41% receive treatment for complications. This equates to an annual rate of 12 per 1,000 women aged 15-49 years being hospitalized for induced abortion complications, which is considered high in international comparison. In Uganda, outside the larger hospitals and private settings, access to safe post abortion care and surgical facilities are scarce. Studies have showed that trained midwives can deliver safe, effective and acceptable post abortion care using misoprostol in the first trimester. Currently in Uganda, treatment of second trimester incomplete abortion is restricted to physicians. This study will provide evidence on whether treatment for incomplete abortion using misoprostol by mid-level providers can be extended to the early second trimester period. The investigators hypothesize that misoprostol treatment for incomplete second trimester abortion provided by midwives is equivalent to that of physicians requiring no further surgical intervention. Women with incomplete abortion will be randomly allocated to undergo a clinical assessment and treatment with misoprostol either by physician or midwife with safety and effectiveness as main outcomes in the RCT carried out in hospital and high volume health centres in Central Uganda.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,191

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

14 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 9, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 14, 2018

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 16, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Post abortion careMisoprostolSecond trimester

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complete abortion

    Number of participants who will have expelled all the products of conception as evidenced by cessation of abdominal cramps, vaginal bleeding and closed cervical os.

    24 hours from treatment initiation

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Excessive vaginal bleeding

    24 hours from treatment initiation

  • Abdominal Pain

    24 hours from treatment initiation

  • Unscheduled visits

    14-28 days post treatment

  • Women's acceptability of the post abortion care provider

    14-28 days post treatment

Study Arms (2)

Misoprostol treatment by Midwife

EXPERIMENTAL

Administration of misoprostol by the midwife and assessment for the primary outcome.

Other: Misoprostol treatment by Midwife

Misoprostol treatment by Doctor

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of misoprostol by the doctor and assessment for the primary outcome.

Other: Misoprostol treatment by Doctor

Interventions

Medical management of incomplete abortion

Misoprostol treatment by Midwife

Medical management of incomplete abortion

Misoprostol treatment by Doctor

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Vaginal bleeding
  • With or without contractions with a uterine size \> 12 weeks to \< 18 weeks
  • History of partial expulsion
  • Open cervical os.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to misoprostol,
  • Unstable hemodynamic status (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg) and shock
  • Signs of pelvic infection and/or sepsis
  • Previous caesarean delivery/uterine scar
  • Suspected extra uterine pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (14)

Entebbe Hospital

Entebbe, Uganda

Location

Gombe Hospital

Gombe, Uganda

Location

Kawempe Hospital

Kampala, Uganda

Location

Kayunga Hospital

Kayunga, 256, Uganda

Location

Kawolo Hospital

Lugazi, 256, Uganda

Location

Luwero HC IV

Luwero, Uganda

Location

Masaka Hospital

Masaka, Uganda

Location

Mityana Hospital

Mityana, Uganda

Location

Mpigi HC IV

Mpigi, Uganda

Location

Kiganda HC IV

Mubende, 256, Uganda

Location

Mukono HC IV

Mukono, Uganda

Location

Nakaseke Hospital

Nakaseke, Uganda

Location

Kasangati HC IV

Wakiso, 256, Uganda

Location

Wakiso HC IV

Wakiso, 256, Uganda

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Faundes A. Strategies for the prevention of unsafe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;119 Suppl 1:S68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

    PMID: 22883917BACKGROUND
  • Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tuncalp O, Johnson BR Jr, Johnston HB, Alkema L. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):258-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4. Epub 2016 May 11.

    PMID: 27179755BACKGROUND
  • Uganda Bureau of Statistcs (UBOS) and ICF. 2017. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy and abortion in Uganda. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2013 Jan;(2):1-8.

    PMID: 23550324BACKGROUND
  • Prada E, Atuyambe LM, Blades NM, Bukenya JN, Orach CG, Bankole A. Incidence of Induced Abortion in Uganda, 2013: New Estimates Since 2003. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165812. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27802338BACKGROUND
  • Mark AG, Edelman A, Borgatta L. Second-trimester postabortion care for ruptured membranes, fetal demise, and incomplete abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

    PMID: 25660084BACKGROUND
  • Klingberg-Allvin M, Cleeve A, Atuhairwe S, Tumwesigye NM, Faxelid E, Byamugisha J, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Comparison of treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol by physicians and midwives at district level in Uganda: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2392-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61935-8. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

    PMID: 25817472BACKGROUND
  • Cleeve A, Byamugisha J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Mbona Tumwesigye N, Atuhairwe S, Faxelid E, Klingberg-Allvin M. Women's Acceptability of Misoprostol Treatment for Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Physicians - Secondary Outcome Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial at District Level in Uganda. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149172. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 26872219BACKGROUND
  • Moran M, Ortega J, Hodoglugil NN. Osur et al.'s Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation. Glob Health Action. 2012 Jul 18;6:21786. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.21786. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23870184BACKGROUND
  • Pongsatha S, Tongsong T. Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy between a vaginal misoprostol loading and non-loading dose regimen for second-trimester pregnancy termination. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jan;40(1):155-60. doi: 10.1111/jog.12147. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

    PMID: 24033985BACKGROUND
  • Dawson AJ, Buchan J, Duffield C, Homer CS, Wijewardena K. Task shifting and sharing in maternal and reproductive health in low-income countries: a narrative synthesis of current evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):396-408. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt026. Epub 2013 May 8.

    PMID: 23656700BACKGROUND
  • Nabudere H, Asiimwe D, Mijumbi R. Task shifting in maternal and child health care: an evidence brief for Uganda. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Apr;27(2):173-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000055. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

    PMID: 21450128BACKGROUND
  • Atuhairwe S, Hanson C, Atuyambe L, Byamugisha J, Tumwesigye NM, Ssenyonga R, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Evaluating women's acceptability of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion using misoprostol provided by midwives compared with physicians: a mixed methods study. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02027-y.

  • Atuhairwe S, Byamugisha J, Kakaire O, Hanson C, Cleeve A, Klingberg-Allvin M, Tumwesigye NM, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives and physicians: a randomised, controlled, equivalence trial in Uganda. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Oct;10(10):e1505-e1513. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00312-6. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

  • Atuhairwe S, Byamugisha J, Klingberg-Allvin M, Cleeve A, Hanson C, Tumwesigye NM, Kakaire O, Danielsson KG. Evaluating the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of treatment of incomplete second-trimester abortion using misoprostol provided by midwives compared with physicians: study protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Trials. 2019 Jun 21;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3490-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Abortion, Incomplete

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Abortion, SpontaneousPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kristina G Danielsson, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Josaphat Byamugisha, PhD

    Makerere University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Susan Atuhairwe, MD

    Makerere University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2018

First Posted

August 9, 2018

Study Start

August 14, 2018

Primary Completion

November 16, 2021

Study Completion

December 16, 2021

Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified data will be available on request for systematic reviews. The particular data shared will depend on the request.

Time Frame
December 2025 to December 2030

Locations