Misoprostol Treatment of Mid Trimester Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Doctors in Uganda.
Safety, Effectiveness and Acceptability of Misoprostol When Administered by Midwives Versus Physicians for Management of Incomplete Mid Trimester Abortion in Uganda: a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,191
1 country
14
Brief Summary
It is estimated that 47,000 women die every year due to consequences of unsafe abortion globally. The majority of pregnancy related deaths occur in low income countries where induced abortion is restricted, unmet need for contraception is high, and women's status is low. Uganda has a high total fertility rate of 5.4 children per woman, low contraceptive prevalence rate of 39%, and more than half of these pregnancies are unintended. Induced abortion is controversial and restricted in Uganda and legally permitted only to save a woman's life. As a result, women often resort to unsafe abortion- that's either performed by a person lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards. Of the estimated 314,304 women who undergo unsafe abortions each year in Uganda, about 41% receive treatment for complications. This equates to an annual rate of 12 per 1,000 women aged 15-49 years being hospitalized for induced abortion complications, which is considered high in international comparison. In Uganda, outside the larger hospitals and private settings, access to safe post abortion care and surgical facilities are scarce. Studies have showed that trained midwives can deliver safe, effective and acceptable post abortion care using misoprostol in the first trimester. Currently in Uganda, treatment of second trimester incomplete abortion is restricted to physicians. This study will provide evidence on whether treatment for incomplete abortion using misoprostol by mid-level providers can be extended to the early second trimester period. The investigators hypothesize that misoprostol treatment for incomplete second trimester abortion provided by midwives is equivalent to that of physicians requiring no further surgical intervention. Women with incomplete abortion will be randomly allocated to undergo a clinical assessment and treatment with misoprostol either by physician or midwife with safety and effectiveness as main outcomes in the RCT carried out in hospital and high volume health centres in Central Uganda.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2021
CompletedMarch 11, 2022
March 1, 2022
3.3 years
June 19, 2018
March 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete abortion
Number of participants who will have expelled all the products of conception as evidenced by cessation of abdominal cramps, vaginal bleeding and closed cervical os.
24 hours from treatment initiation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Excessive vaginal bleeding
24 hours from treatment initiation
Abdominal Pain
24 hours from treatment initiation
Unscheduled visits
14-28 days post treatment
Women's acceptability of the post abortion care provider
14-28 days post treatment
Study Arms (2)
Misoprostol treatment by Midwife
EXPERIMENTALAdministration of misoprostol by the midwife and assessment for the primary outcome.
Misoprostol treatment by Doctor
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdministration of misoprostol by the doctor and assessment for the primary outcome.
Interventions
Medical management of incomplete abortion
Medical management of incomplete abortion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Vaginal bleeding
- With or without contractions with a uterine size \> 12 weeks to \< 18 weeks
- History of partial expulsion
- Open cervical os.
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to misoprostol,
- Unstable hemodynamic status (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg) and shock
- Signs of pelvic infection and/or sepsis
- Previous caesarean delivery/uterine scar
- Suspected extra uterine pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Makerere Universitylead
- Karolinska Institutetcollaborator
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Entebbe Hospital
Entebbe, Uganda
Gombe Hospital
Gombe, Uganda
Kawempe Hospital
Kampala, Uganda
Kayunga Hospital
Kayunga, 256, Uganda
Kawolo Hospital
Lugazi, 256, Uganda
Luwero HC IV
Luwero, Uganda
Masaka Hospital
Masaka, Uganda
Mityana Hospital
Mityana, Uganda
Mpigi HC IV
Mpigi, Uganda
Kiganda HC IV
Mubende, 256, Uganda
Mukono HC IV
Mukono, Uganda
Nakaseke Hospital
Nakaseke, Uganda
Kasangati HC IV
Wakiso, 256, Uganda
Wakiso HC IV
Wakiso, 256, Uganda
Related Publications (15)
Faundes A. Strategies for the prevention of unsafe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;119 Suppl 1:S68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PMID: 22883917BACKGROUNDSedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tuncalp O, Johnson BR Jr, Johnston HB, Alkema L. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):258-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4. Epub 2016 May 11.
PMID: 27179755BACKGROUNDUganda Bureau of Statistcs (UBOS) and ICF. 2017. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF.
BACKGROUNDHussain R. Unintended pregnancy and abortion in Uganda. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2013 Jan;(2):1-8.
PMID: 23550324BACKGROUNDPrada E, Atuyambe LM, Blades NM, Bukenya JN, Orach CG, Bankole A. Incidence of Induced Abortion in Uganda, 2013: New Estimates Since 2003. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165812. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27802338BACKGROUNDMark AG, Edelman A, Borgatta L. Second-trimester postabortion care for ruptured membranes, fetal demise, and incomplete abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
PMID: 25660084BACKGROUNDKlingberg-Allvin M, Cleeve A, Atuhairwe S, Tumwesigye NM, Faxelid E, Byamugisha J, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Comparison of treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol by physicians and midwives at district level in Uganda: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2392-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61935-8. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
PMID: 25817472BACKGROUNDCleeve A, Byamugisha J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Mbona Tumwesigye N, Atuhairwe S, Faxelid E, Klingberg-Allvin M. Women's Acceptability of Misoprostol Treatment for Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Physicians - Secondary Outcome Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial at District Level in Uganda. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149172. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26872219BACKGROUNDMoran M, Ortega J, Hodoglugil NN. Osur et al.'s Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation. Glob Health Action. 2012 Jul 18;6:21786. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.21786. No abstract available.
PMID: 23870184BACKGROUNDPongsatha S, Tongsong T. Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy between a vaginal misoprostol loading and non-loading dose regimen for second-trimester pregnancy termination. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jan;40(1):155-60. doi: 10.1111/jog.12147. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24033985BACKGROUNDDawson AJ, Buchan J, Duffield C, Homer CS, Wijewardena K. Task shifting and sharing in maternal and reproductive health in low-income countries: a narrative synthesis of current evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):396-408. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt026. Epub 2013 May 8.
PMID: 23656700BACKGROUNDNabudere H, Asiimwe D, Mijumbi R. Task shifting in maternal and child health care: an evidence brief for Uganda. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Apr;27(2):173-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000055. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21450128BACKGROUNDAtuhairwe S, Hanson C, Atuyambe L, Byamugisha J, Tumwesigye NM, Ssenyonga R, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Evaluating women's acceptability of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion using misoprostol provided by midwives compared with physicians: a mixed methods study. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02027-y.
PMID: 36335344DERIVEDAtuhairwe S, Byamugisha J, Kakaire O, Hanson C, Cleeve A, Klingberg-Allvin M, Tumwesigye NM, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives and physicians: a randomised, controlled, equivalence trial in Uganda. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Oct;10(10):e1505-e1513. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00312-6. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
PMID: 36030801DERIVEDAtuhairwe S, Byamugisha J, Klingberg-Allvin M, Cleeve A, Hanson C, Tumwesigye NM, Kakaire O, Danielsson KG. Evaluating the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of treatment of incomplete second-trimester abortion using misoprostol provided by midwives compared with physicians: study protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Trials. 2019 Jun 21;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3490-5.
PMID: 31227019DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kristina G Danielsson, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Josaphat Byamugisha, PhD
Makerere University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Atuhairwe, MD
Makerere University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2018
First Posted
August 9, 2018
Study Start
August 14, 2018
Primary Completion
November 16, 2021
Study Completion
December 16, 2021
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- December 2025 to December 2030
Deidentified data will be available on request for systematic reviews. The particular data shared will depend on the request.