Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Standard Surgical Care for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
5 countries
6
Brief Summary
In this study, we will compare the safety and efficacy of 400 mcg sublingually administered misoprostol alone to standard surgical care for the treatment of incomplete abortion. This study will provide important data on the role of misoprostol in health services offering an array of treatments for incomplete abortion. Women could significantly benefit from a non-invasive treatment option for incomplete abortion. While safe surgical services are becoming more widespread, there is still a serious risk of complications from these procedures. Especially in developing countries, infection, hemorrhage and uterine damage are still too common. Medical treatment of incomplete abortion using misoprostol would be a tremendous step to reducing morbidity and mortality due to abortion complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 30, 2012
March 1, 2012
2.8 years
April 25, 2007
March 28, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete abortion without recourse to surgical intervention.
follow up visit 7 days after initial treatment
Study Arms (2)
surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard surgical treatment (either dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)
misoprostol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR400 mcg misoprostol
Interventions
standard surgical treatment (dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Uterine size no larger than 12 weeks LMP at time of presentation for care.
- Past or present history of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy.
- Open cervical os.
- If ultrasound used evidence of incomplete abortion with substantial debris in the uterus.
- All women would have been advised to have surgical evacuation of the uterus if misoprostol was not available.
- General good health.
- Willing to provide contact information for purposes of follow-up.
- Also in Egypt: 21 years of age or over or parental permission (there is no minimum age requirement in Niger, Mauritania and Senegal).
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to study drug
- Signs of severe infection, defined as at least one of the following: 1) foul smelling discharge, 2) fever \> 38 degrees C , 3) uterine tenderness
- Hemodynamic disturbances (pulse \>110/min and systolic bp \<100)
- Have an IUD in place; (the IUD may be removed making the woman eligible)
- Suspected ectopic pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Dandé District Hospital/Ziniaré District Hospital
Dande/Ziniare, Burkina Faso
El-Galaa Teaching Hospital
Cairo, Egypt
Shatby Maternity Hospital/Alexandria University
Shatby, Alexandria, Egypt
Cheikh Zayed Hospital
Nouakchott, Mauritania
Maternite Issaka Gazobi
Niamey, Niger
Centre de Sante Le Roi Baudouin
Guédiawaye, Senegal
Related Publications (4)
Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tuncalp O, Lavelanet A, Gulmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
PMID: 34061352DERIVEDShochet T, Diop A, Gaye A, Nayama M, Sall AB, Bukola F, Blandine T, Abiola OM, Dao B, Olayinka O, Winikoff B. Sublingual misoprostol versus standard surgical care for treatment of incomplete abortion in five sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 14;12:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-127.
PMID: 23150927DERIVEDBlandine T, Ouattara AZ, Coral A, Hassane C, Clotaire H, Dao B, Lankoande J, Diop A, Blum J. Sublingual [corrected] misoprostol as first-line care for incomplete abortion in Burkina Faso. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;119(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.036. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
PMID: 22935621DERIVEDDabash R, Ramadan MC, Darwish E, Hassanein N, Blum J, Winikoff B. A randomized controlled trial of 400-mug sublingual misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion in two Egyptian hospitals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;111(2):131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.021.
PMID: 20801444DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beverly Winikoff, MD, MPH
Gynuity Health Projects
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rasha Dabash, MPH
Gynuity Health Projects
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayisha Diop, MPH
Gynuity Health Projects
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2007
First Posted
April 27, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03