Antioxidants vs. Ovarian Bio-stimulation Therapy to Rescue the Ovarian Reserve
Antioxidants vs.Ovarian Bio-stimulation Therapy to Rescue the Ovarian Reserve
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Two group of patients were selected. Group 1 represents 46 patients that received ovarian-biostimulation monthly for three months. Group 2 represents 32 patients that received antioxidant therapy daily for 3 months. Results are noted and analysed. Both groups represent patients with procedures already ongoing, and with diagnosed poor or depleted ovarian reserve. The analysis has been made to compare the efficacy of both procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2018
CompletedAugust 8, 2018
August 1, 2018
1 year
July 28, 2018
August 3, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
variation of hormones FSH and LH directly involved with ovarian reserve
Both groups are compared after bio-stimulation and antioxidant therapy is performed to access any possible changes with FSH-LH post-treatment.
18 months
variation of AMH directly involved with ovarian reserve in both groups
Both groups are compared after bio-stimulation and antioxidant therapy is performed to access any possible changes with AMH values.
18 months
variation in recruitment of antral follicles in both groups
Both groups are compared after bio-stimulation and antioxidant therapy is performed to access any possible changes with the number of astral follicles available.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of good quality eggs obtained in both groups after IVF
18 months
Number and quality of fertilised eggs obtained in both groups after IVF
18 months
Study Arms (2)
ovarian bio-stimulation
EXPERIMENTALIntervention: ovarian bio-stimulation: blood rich plasma platelets
Antioxidant therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: antioxidants: Q10, DHEA, Vitamin E, Vitamin C, omega 3
Interventions
Injection of blood rich platelet into the ovaries.
Antioxidants: Q10, DHEA, Vitamina E, Vitamin C, Omega 3
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 38 and 46 years
- FSH\> 12 mIU
- Estradiol \> 100 pg/ml
- AMH \< 0.8 ng/mL
You may not qualify if:
- Pelvic inflammatory syndrome
- vaginal pathologies
- known history of hyperandrogenism
- diagnosed platelet disorders as adhesion
- aggregation
- disorder of thromboxane synthesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lucy Colemanlead
Study Sites (1)
Fertiaguerrevere Fertility
Caracas, Disfrito Federal, 1018, Venezuela
Related Publications (8)
Bhartiya D, Parte S, Patel H, Sriraman K, Zaveri K, Hinduja I. Novel Action of FSH on Stem Cells in Adult Mammalian Ovary Induces Postnatal Oogenesis and Primordial Follicle Assembly. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:5096596. doi: 10.1155/2016/5096596. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
PMID: 26635884RESULTTelfer EE. Germline stem cells in the postnatal mammalian ovary: a phenomenon of prosimian primates and mice? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 May 18;2:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-24. No abstract available.
PMID: 15149546RESULTJohnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature. 2004 Mar 11;428(6979):145-50. doi: 10.1038/nature02316.
PMID: 15014492RESULTPan Z, Sun M, Liang X, Li J, Zhou F, Zhong Z, Zheng Y. The Controversy, Challenges, and Potential Benefits of Putative Female Germline Stem Cells Research in Mammals. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:1728278. doi: 10.1155/2016/1728278. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PMID: 26788065RESULTOzakpinar OB, Maurer AM, Ozsavci D. Ovarian stem cells: From basic to clinical applications. World J Stem Cells. 2015 May 26;7(4):757-68. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i4.757.
PMID: 26029346RESULTDiamanti-Kandarakis E, Dattilo M, Macut D, Duntas L, Gonos ES, Goulis DG, Gantenbein CK, Kapetanou M, Koukkou E, Lambrinoudaki I, Michalaki M, Eftekhari-Nader S, Pasquali R, Peppa M, Tzanela M, Vassilatou E, Vryonidou A; COMBO ENDO TEAM: 2016. MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Aging and anti-aging: a Combo-Endocrinology overview. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017 Jun;176(6):R283-R308. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-1061. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
PMID: 28264815RESULTGat I, Blanco Mejia S, Balakier H, Librach CL, Claessens A, Ryan EA. The use of coenzyme Q10 and DHEA during IUI and IVF cycles in patients with decreased ovarian reserve. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;32(7):534-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1137095. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
PMID: 26829445RESULTOzcan P, Ficicioglu C, Kizilkale O, Yesiladali M, Tok OE, Ozkan F, Esrefoglu M. Can Coenzyme Q10 supplementation protect the ovarian reserve against oxidative damage? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1223-30. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0751-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PMID: 27255570RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmen Navarro, MD
Medical staff
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Scientific director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2018
First Posted
August 8, 2018
Study Start
January 6, 2016
Primary Completion
January 10, 2017
Study Completion
August 28, 2017
Last Updated
August 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08