Study Stopped
Lack of funding
Velocity Time Integral vs PICCO for Evaluation of Passive Leg Raising in Septic Shock
VIPS
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of the present study is to investigate accuracy of changes in cardiac output following passive leg raising as estimated by transthoracic ultrasound as method to predict fluid responsiveness and compare that to changes in cardiac output following PLR as estimated by calibrated pulse contour analysis as method to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2021
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
January 1, 2022
1.3 years
May 17, 2018
January 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for prediction of fluid responsiveness.
Prediction of fluid responsiveness by evaluation change in cardiac output using either transthoracic ultrasound or calibrated pulse contour analysis after a passive leg raising.
Cardiac output will be measured immediately prior to passive leg raising and 1 minute after completion of passive leg raising
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Positive and negative likelihood ratios
Cardiac output will be measured immediately prior to passive leg raising and 1 minute after completion of passive leg raising
Other Outcomes (1)
Usefulness
During screening or during examination
Eligibility Criteria
Patients presenting to either of the two study sites a fulfilling inclusion criteria
You may qualify if:
- Septic shock according to the sepsis-3 criteria
- The treating physician plans to administer fluid to improve organ perfusion and oxygenation due to signs of inadequate organ perfusion and hypoxia (skin mottling, tachycardia (\>100), urine output below 0.5 ml/kg/h, lactate persistently \> 2 mmol/l and central venous oxygen saturation \< 70%, increasing doses of vasoconstrictors to maintain mean arterial pressure \>65 mmHg.
- Hemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution initiated as part of routine clinical monitoring.
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition that will affect the reliability of the PLR procedure or is a contraindication to PLR (compression stockings or intraabdominal pressure \> 12 mm Hg, raised intracranial pressure).
- PaO2/FiO2 \< 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa) or suspicion of cardiogenic edema
- Transthoracic echo does not allow recording of VTI.
- Age \>18 years.
- No informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
Study Sites (2)
Helsingborg Hospital
Helsingborg, Sweden
Skåne University Hospital
Malmo, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Bentzer, MD, PhD
Medical faculty, Lund University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2018
First Posted
August 8, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01