Selective Reporting of Antibiotic Susceptibility Test Results in Urinary Tract Infections in the Outpatient Setting
Impact of Selective Reporting of Antibiotic Susceptibility Test Results in Urinary Tract Infections in the Outpatient Setting: a Protocol for a Pragmatic, Prospective Quasi-experimental Trial
1 other identifier
observational
64,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Antibiotic resistance is a serious and increasing worldwide threat to global public health. One of antibiotic stewardship programmes' objectives is to reduce inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics' prescription. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results, which consists of reporting to prescribers only few (n=5-6) antibiotics, preferring first-line and narrow-spectrum agents, is one possible strategy advised in recommendations. However, selective reporting of AST has never been evaluated using an experimental design. This study is a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, controlled (selective reporting vs usual complete reporting of AST), before-after (year 2019 vs 2017) study. Selective reporting of AST is scheduled to be implemented from September 2018 in the ATOUTBIO group of 21 laboratories for all E. coli identified in urine cultures in adult outpatients, and to be compared to the usual complete AST performed in the EVOLAB group of 20 laboratories. The main objective is to assess the impact of selective reporting of AST for E. coli positive urine cultures in the outpatient setting on the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently used for urinary tract infections (amoxicillin-clavulanate, third generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones). The primary endpoint is the after (2019) - before (2017) difference in prescription rates for the previously mentioned antibiotics/classes that will be compared between the two laboratory groups, using linear regression models. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of selective reporting of AST implementation by French laboratories and their acceptability by organising focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews with general practitioners and laboratory professionals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedAugust 2, 2018
June 1, 2018
1.3 years
July 2, 2018
August 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Impact of selective reporting of AST for E. coli positive urine cultures in outpatient setting on the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently used on UTIs (amoxicillin-clavulanate, third generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones)
A comparison of the after (2019) - before (2017) difference of the prescription rates for previous mentioned antibiotics/classes between the two groups, using linear regression models adjusted for variables that differ between groups (laboratory activities, sex-ratio, age).
2 years (1 year before + 1 year after)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Laboratory expenditures (in euros) for the implementation of the intervention
2 years
Satisfaction of GPs and laboratory staffs about selective reporting of AST, assessed by a visual analog scale
1 year
Study Arms (2)
ATOUTBIO
Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility tests for all E. coli identified in urine cultures of adults.
EVOLAB
Complete reporting of antibiotic susceptibility tests for all E. coli identified in urine cultures of adults.
Interventions
Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility tests for all E. coli identified in urine cultures of adults: results of susceptibility are reported back to the practitioner only for few (n=5-6) antibiotics, those that should be used in first line according to guidelines. Susceptibility results not mentioned in the selective reporting of AST are available at the practitioners' request to the microbiologist. Data used to determine which antibiotic to report for UTIs are the isolated microorganism, the patient age and gender, and antibiotics recommended in national guidelines. As guidelines for UTIs treatment differ by gender, two algorithms have been developed and pilot-tested by three GPs, one microbiologist and two infectious disease physicians.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with E. coli urinary tract infections
You may qualify if:
- adults with an E. coli positive urine culture on which an AST is realised in the year 2017 and 2019 in ATOUTBIO or EVOLAB laboratories
- adults who go to ambulatory care practitioners located in the geographic areas served by all the 41 laboratories studied (in the intervention ATOUTBIO group or the control EVOLAB group).
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Central Hospital, Nancy, Francelead
- University of Lorrainecollaborator
Related Publications (15)
Etienne C, Pulcini C. [Prospective cross-sectional study of antibiotic prescriptions in a sample of French general practitioners]. Presse Med. 2015 Mar;44(3):e59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.07.022. Epub 2015 Jan 31. French.
PMID: 25650299BACKGROUNDDenes E, Prouzergue J, Ducroix-Roubertou S, Aupetit C, Weinbreck P. Antibiotic prescription by general practitioners for urinary tract infections in outpatients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):3079-83. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1668-9. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
PMID: 22722765BACKGROUNDBarlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, Srinivasan A, Dellit TH, Falck-Ytter YT, Fishman NO, Hamilton CW, Jenkins TC, Lipsett PA, Malani PN, May LS, Moran GJ, Neuhauser MM, Newland JG, Ohl CA, Samore MH, Seo SK, Trivedi KK. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):e51-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
PMID: 27080992BACKGROUNDPulcini C, Tebano G, Mutters NT, Tacconelli E, Cambau E, Kahlmeter G, Jarlier V; EUCIC-ESGAP-EUCAST Selective Reporting Working Group. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results in European countries: an ESCMID cross-sectional survey. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Feb;49(2):162-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
PMID: 28093208BACKGROUNDCoupat C, Pradier C, Degand N, Hofliger P, Pulcini C. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility data improves the appropriateness of intended antibiotic prescriptions in urinary tract infections: a case-vignette randomised study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;32(5):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1786-4. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
PMID: 23224717BACKGROUNDBourdellon L, Thilly N, Fougnot S, Pulcini C, Henard S. Impact of selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results on the appropriateness of antibiotics chosen by French general practitioners in urinary tract infections: a randomised controlled case-vignette study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Aug;50(2):258-262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.040. Epub 2017 May 31.
PMID: 28577933BACKGROUNDSilveira DP, Artmann E. Accuracy of probabilistic record linkage applied to health databases: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Oct;43(5):875-82. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000060. Epub 2009 Sep 25. English, Portuguese.
PMID: 19784456BACKGROUNDLangford BJ, Seah J, Chan A, Downing M, Johnstone J, Matukas LM. Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Microbiology Laboratory: Impact of Selective Susceptibility Reporting on Ciprofloxacin Utilization and Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Isolates to Ciprofloxacin in a Hospital Setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2343-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00950-16. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
PMID: 27385708BACKGROUNDSteffee CH, Morrell RM, Wasilauskas BL. Clinical use of rifampicin during routine reporting of rifampicin susceptibilities: a lesson in selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility data. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Oct;40(4):595-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.4.595.
PMID: 9372433BACKGROUNDJohnson LS, Patel D, King EA, Maslow JN. Impact of microbiology cascade reporting on antibiotic de-escalation in cefazolin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;35(7):1151-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2645-5. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PMID: 27130036BACKGROUNDTan TY, McNulty C, Charlett A, Nessa N, Kelly C, Beswick T. Laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting and antibiotic prescribing in general practice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Feb;51(2):379-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg032.
PMID: 12562706BACKGROUNDMcNulty CA, Lasseter GM, Charlett A, Lovering A, Howell-Jones R, Macgowan A, Thomas M. Does laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting influence primary care prescribing in urinary tract infection and other infections? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Jun;66(6):1396-404. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr088. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
PMID: 21398297BACKGROUNDSharland M, Pulcini C, Harbarth S, Zeng M, Gandra S, Mathur S, Magrini N; 21st WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. Classifying antibiotics in the WHO Essential Medicines List for optimal use-be AWaRe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):18-20. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30724-7. Epub 2017 Dec 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 29303731BACKGROUNDPulcini C, Huttner A. CMI policy on antimicrobial stewardship research. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Feb;24(2):91-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 10. No abstract available.
PMID: 29133158BACKGROUNDTuppin P, Rudant J, Constantinou P, Gastaldi-Menager C, Rachas A, de Roquefeuil L, Maura G, Caillol H, Tajahmady A, Coste J, Gissot C, Weill A, Fagot-Campagna A. Value of a national administrative database to guide public decisions: From the systeme national d'information interregimes de l'Assurance Maladie (SNIIRAM) to the systeme national des donnees de sante (SNDS) in France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Oct;65 Suppl 4:S149-S167. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
PMID: 28756037BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Santé publique France. Résistance aux anti-infectieux - Données par pathogène. 2017.
- Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé. L'évolution des consommations d'antibiotiques en France entre 2000 et 2015
- Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française. Recommandations pour la prise en charge des infections urinaires bactériennes communautaires de l'adulte. 2017.
- Ministère chargé de la santé. Plan national d'alerte sur les antibiotiques. 2011-2016.
- Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. La mise en place d'antibiogrammes ciblés dans les infections urinaires à Escherichia coli. 2016
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Céline Pulcini, Professor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2018
First Posted
August 2, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share