Testing Psychosocial Treatment Planning Methods for Youth Anxiety and Depression
Personalizing Treatment Through Shared Decision Making for Youth Psychotherapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Youth depression and anxiety represent a serious public health concern, with affected youth often experiencing social, familial, and academic impairment. Research evidence supports a growing array of effective treatments for youth depression and anxiety, yet as the collection of evidence-based treatments expands, so do the challenges of utilizing the evidence: clinicians must be able to (1) access, integrate, and apply the available evidence, and (2) engage in a collaborative process with each family to develop a plan that is responsive to each family's unique characteristics, preferences, and goals. Engaging caregivers and youths as active collaborators in the treatment planning process is a patient-centered approach with the potential to improve the process and outcome of youth mental health care by facilitating the personalization of established evidence-based treatment approaches. Such collaboration, frequently referred to as shared decision-making (SDM), is a hallmark of evidence-based practice and a key feature of federal guidelines for health care delivery. However, despite growing rhetorical support for SDM, empirical support is lacking, particularly in the area of youth mental health treatment. The absence of such research is unfortunate, given the potential for SDM to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments, and to personalize the use of established treatments to increase acceptability, retention, satisfaction, and overall effectiveness. The present project tests the feasibility and acceptability of SDM through a pilot randomized controlled trial of 40 youths (ages 7-15) meeting diagnostic criteria for an anxiety or depressive disorder. The trial will compare an evidence-based treatment that is planned collaboratively with youths and caregivers using the SDM protocol, to an evidence-based treatment that is planned by the clinician and supervisor using pretreatment assessment data. Eligible youths will received up to 26 treatment sessions at no cost and complete assessments prior to the start of treatment, at the end of treatment, and six months following the end of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 27, 2019
CompletedJanuary 28, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.4 years
June 29, 2018
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent
The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent is an extensively tested semi-structured interview assessing the major anxiety, mood, and externalizing disorders.
Through completion of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 5 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction with Decision Scale
At the start of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 3 weeks after the initial assessment
Study Arms (2)
Shared Decision Making
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, parents and children will participate in a shared decision-making protocol with the clinician to plan their treatment. The treatment options available are established, evidence-based treatment techniques. The shared decision-making protocol was developed for this research project.
Clinician Guided
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, the clinician will plan the treatment in consultation with their supervisor, and share the treatment plan with the parent and child. The parent and child will have the opportunity to ask questions about the treatment plan (and, if they do not agree, reject the treatment plan), but they are not actively involved in making each decision. This is more typical of usual care.
Interventions
MATCH is a collection of 31 modules that correspond to the treatment procedures included in standard evidence-based treatments for youth depression, anxiety, and behavioral disorders.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a current DSM-5 principal diagnosis of a Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Separation Anxiety Disorder, Social Phobia, or Specific Phobia
- if receiving psychiatric medication, dose will be stable for at least 3 months at enrollment with ability to maintain medication
- youth and caregiver speak fluent English
You may not qualify if:
- active suicidality
- history of severe physical or mental impairments (e.g., mental retardation, autism spectrum disorders) in youth or caregiver
- participation in additional psychosocial treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David A Langer, Ph.D.
Boston University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessors do not have access to data regarding which arm each participant is in.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2018
First Posted
August 1, 2018
Study Start
October 4, 2016
Primary Completion
February 20, 2019
Study Completion
August 27, 2019
Last Updated
January 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01