NCT03609164

Brief Summary

There are several associated structural changes when dealing with massive rotator cuff repair, which include tendon retraction and fragility, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration, as well as osteoporosis over the tendon insertion. Those changes may lead to difficult in applying double-row repair, suture cutting through the tendon, too much tension over the repair and loosening or pull-out of anchors, which may results in poor tendon-bone healing and subsequent high re-tear rate. Therefore decreasing the tension over the repair site may increase the healing over tendon bone junction as well as decrease the risk of anchors loosening. A suture-spanning augmentation with two set of suture loops passing over musculotendinous junction medially and fixed with anchor at the lateral cortical wall may solve the problem. In order to define the clinical benefit of this adjuvant procedure, a prospective randomized control study is designed to compare the adjunctive reinforce suture with the single-row simple suture repair in massive rotator cuff tear. Around sixty patients were randomized divided into two groups. The study group was used adjunctive reinforce suture repair technique, which was one lateral cortical anchor holding 2 separated set of transverse looping sutures over the medial musculotendinous junction in addition to single row repair, while the control group was used single row repair technique in simple stitch fashion. All patients will have clinical evaluation in pain (VAS score) and functional recovery (ASES and UCLA score) as well as MRI image for the tendon integrity. If the suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair can yield an improved healing rate and fewer complications, massive rotator cuff tear should be repaired earlier in order to prevent the late development of irreparable tear.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

arthroscopic surgerymassive rotator cuff repairsingle-row repairsuture-spanning augmentation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Retear rate

    Using MR imaging to determine the presence or absence of rotator cuff retears

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    2 years

  • The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score

    2 years

  • University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA Shoulder Score)

    2 years

  • Shoulder constant score

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

single-row repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Interventions

Suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repairsingle-row repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • the pre-operative image (MRI) showing the massive rotator cuff tear (fulfilling one of the following definition a tear with a diameter of 5 cm or more; a complete tear of two or more tendons; one with a coronal length and sagittal width greater than or equal to 2 cm)
  • patient was willing and able to provide scores for the study

You may not qualify if:

  • irreparable rotator cuff tear which was identified pre-operatively or intra-operatively
  • glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis
  • stage III or more of the fatty degenerative of supraspinatus in Goutallier classification
  • revision surgery
  • patients with bacteremia, a systemic infection, or an infection at the surgical site
  • patients who previously attempted or failed a treatment program

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hsiao-Li

Taipei, 11217, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ma HH, Chen KH, Chiang ER, Chou TA, Ma HL. Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear? Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836419. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Hsiao-Li Ma, MD

    Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2018

First Posted

August 1, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

April 30, 2016

Study Completion

June 30, 2018

Last Updated

August 1, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations