NCT02211183

Brief Summary

This is a post-marketing study to further assess the safety and effectiveness of the InSpace™ device implantation in comparison to surgical repair of full thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tear .

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Massive Rotator Cuff TearSub-acromial spacerBest repair of rotator cuff

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The change in Shoulder Score from baseline

    baseline and 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Best Repair of torn Rotator Cuff

SHAM COMPARATOR

Subjects will undergo surgical intervention (usually arthroscopy) to perform debridement, acromioplasty if deemed necessary, long head of biceps tenotomy, and at least partial repair.

Procedure: Best Repair of torn Rotator Cuff

InSpace™ system

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will undergo surgical intervention (usually arthroscopy or mini invasive) of debridement, acromioplasty if deemed necessary with or without long head of biceps tenotomy, and placement of the InSpace™ system.

Device: InSpace™ system

Interventions

Best Repair of torn Rotator Cuff
InSpace™ system

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 40 or older.
  • Positive diagnostic imaging of the affected shoulder indicating full thickness Massive RCT (according to Cofield classification) or long involving more than one tendon.
  • Persistent pain and functional disability of the affected shoulder for at least 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to the balloon material (copolymer of PLA and -θ-caprolactone).
  • Evidence of significant osteoarthritis or cartilage damage in the shoulder
  • Evidence of gleno-humeral instability
  • Previous surgery of the shoulder in the past 2 years, excluding diagnostic arthroscopy
  • Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, or necrosis in the shoulder
  • Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fundacion Jimenez Diaz

Madrid, 28040, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Emilio Calvo, MD

    Head of Shoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2014

First Posted

August 7, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations