NCT03599856

Brief Summary

The effectiveness of current checklists is hampered by lack of acceptance and compliance. Recently, a new type of checklist with dynamic properties has been created to provide more specific checklist items for each individual patient. The proof of concept of this dynamic clinical checklist (DCC; BJA 2017 (DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex129)) was tested in a simulation trial with improved outcomes and high acceptance scores. The purpose of this study is to investigate if the outcomes of this real-life clinical proof of concept study are similar with the outcomes of the simulation trial for the intensive care unit (ICU) ward.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
408

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 12, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 29, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

ChecklistIntensive Care UnitClinical decision support systemsMedical errorsPatient safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Checked items

    The percentage of daily checked checkable items overall and items requiring an intervention per patient.

    24 hours (each day)

Secondary Outcomes (26)

  • Mortality

    9 months

  • Mortality

    9 months

  • Mortality

    9 months

  • Length of stay

    9 months

  • Ventilator days

    9 months

  • +21 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

"Before" control group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group with observation of current local standard of care with paper checklist available at the bedside during the ICU rounds of the ICU physicians (as usual)

"After" Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

An mini Ipad providing TraceBook' intelligent dynamic clinical checklists during the ICU rounds of the ICU physicians.

Other: TraceBook

Interventions

TraceBook offers the user intelligent dynamic clinical checklist that shows patient specific items to a specific user while being context aware.

Also known as: Dynamic clinical checklist
"After" Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians working on the ICU
  • All admitted patients on the ICU during the study periods.

You may not qualify if:

  • Physicians objecting participation in the trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Catharina Hospital

Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • De Bie AJR, Nan S, Vermeulen LRE, Van Gorp PME, Bouwman RA, Bindels AJGH, Korsten HHM. Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):231-238. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex129.

  • De Bie AJR, Mestrom E, Compagner W, Nan S, van Genugten L, Dellimore K, Eerden J, van Leeuwen S, van de Pol H, Schuling F, Lu X, Bindels AJGH, Bouwman ARA, Korsten EHHM. Intelligent checklists improve checklist compliance in the intensive care unit: a prospective before-and-after mixed-method study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):404-414. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Erik Korsten, Prof MD

    Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A prospective single center (Catharina Hospital Eindhoven) controlled before-and-after study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physician-scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2018

First Posted

July 26, 2018

Study Start

June 2, 2018

Primary Completion

February 12, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations