NCT03284359

Brief Summary

Difficulties enrolling patients in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have long been recognized as a major barrier to successful evaluation of medical interventions. This is particularly problematic among intensive care unit (ICU) trials, of which more than one-third do not reach target enrollment. Under-enrollment and selective enrollment reduce RCTs' abilities to answer the research questions, thereby degrading the trials' scientific value and ethics. Current evidence suggests that financial incentives can ethically increase study enrollment, but this approach can pose large up-front costs to researchers. However, several nonmonetary behavioral interventions, or nudges, may offer novel and easily scalable approaches to increase enrollment in RCTs. The investigation team propose a 2-arm RCT in 10 ICUs at Penn to test the relative effectiveness of nudges on enrollment rates. Investigators hypothesize that a bundle of nudges during recruitment will increase enrollment rates compared to usual recruitment procedures will increase enrollment. Investigators will enroll 182 critically ill patients' surrogate decision makers(participants) to engage in recruitment procedures for a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Investigators will also measure participants' assessment of risk of the simulated trial after the informed consent process. This work will provide the first empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of inexpensive, scalable nudges to potentially augment enrollment and reduce costs of future clinical trials.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
182

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 19, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 8, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 8, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 3, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2017

Results QC Date

February 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Critical IllnessMechanical VentilationEconomics, BehavioralSurrogate decision maker

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Consent Rate

    The primary outcome is consent rate for a simulated RCT. This is an easily measurable binary outcome that has the potential for significant impact on future trial recruitment.

    Up to 96 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Risk Assessment

    Up to 96 hours

Study Arms (2)

Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle

EXPERIMENTAL

Arm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey.

Behavioral: Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle

Standard Consent

NO INTERVENTION

Arm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.

Interventions

The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.

Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Surrogate decision-makers of patients who are:
  • Patient and surrogate is 18 years of age or older
  • Surrogate is English-proficient
  • Patient is mechanically ventilated
  • Patient is admitted to participating ICU

You may not qualify if:

  • Surrogate decision-makers of patients who are:
  • Patient is receiving comfort care only
  • Patient has anticipated extubation in the next 24 hours.
  • Patient with tracheostomy.
  • Bedside clinician declines patient participation.
  • Surrogate decision maker not available to approach prior to patient being extubated.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-6006, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Krutsinger DC, O'Leary KL, Ellenberg SS, Cotner CE, Halpern SD, Courtright KR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1117-1125. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-194OC.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessBehavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Katherine Courtright
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Study Officials

  • Katherine Courtright, M.D., M.S.

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2017

First Posted

September 15, 2017

Study Start

February 19, 2018

Primary Completion

August 8, 2019

Study Completion

August 8, 2019

Last Updated

March 3, 2021

Results First Posted

March 3, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations