Use of Nudges To Enhance Enrollment in Critical Care Research
A Randomized Trial of Nudges To Enhance Enrollment in Critical Care Research
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Difficulties enrolling patients in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have long been recognized as a major barrier to successful evaluation of medical interventions. This is particularly problematic among intensive care unit (ICU) trials, of which more than one-third do not reach target enrollment. Under-enrollment and selective enrollment reduce RCTs' abilities to answer the research questions, thereby degrading the trials' scientific value and ethics. Current evidence suggests that financial incentives can ethically increase study enrollment, but this approach can pose large up-front costs to researchers. However, several nonmonetary behavioral interventions, or nudges, may offer novel and easily scalable approaches to increase enrollment in RCTs. The investigation team propose a 2-arm RCT in 10 ICUs at Penn to test the relative effectiveness of nudges on enrollment rates. Investigators hypothesize that a bundle of nudges during recruitment will increase enrollment rates compared to usual recruitment procedures will increase enrollment. Investigators will enroll 182 critically ill patients' surrogate decision makers(participants) to engage in recruitment procedures for a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Investigators will also measure participants' assessment of risk of the simulated trial after the informed consent process. This work will provide the first empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of inexpensive, scalable nudges to potentially augment enrollment and reduce costs of future clinical trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 8, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 3, 2021
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.5 years
August 15, 2017
February 11, 2021
February 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Consent Rate
The primary outcome is consent rate for a simulated RCT. This is an easily measurable binary outcome that has the potential for significant impact on future trial recruitment.
Up to 96 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Risk Assessment
Up to 96 hours
Study Arms (2)
Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle
EXPERIMENTALArm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey.
Standard Consent
NO INTERVENTIONArm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.
Interventions
The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surrogate decision-makers of patients who are:
- Patient and surrogate is 18 years of age or older
- Surrogate is English-proficient
- Patient is mechanically ventilated
- Patient is admitted to participating ICU
You may not qualify if:
- Surrogate decision-makers of patients who are:
- Patient is receiving comfort care only
- Patient has anticipated extubation in the next 24 hours.
- Patient with tracheostomy.
- Bedside clinician declines patient participation.
- Surrogate decision maker not available to approach prior to patient being extubated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-6006, United States
Related Publications (1)
Krutsinger DC, O'Leary KL, Ellenberg SS, Cotner CE, Halpern SD, Courtright KR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1117-1125. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-194OC.
PMID: 32441987DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Katherine Courtright
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katherine Courtright, M.D., M.S.
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2017
First Posted
September 15, 2017
Study Start
February 19, 2018
Primary Completion
August 8, 2019
Study Completion
August 8, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Results First Posted
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share