NCT03597191

Brief Summary

The investigators would like to know which one of two exercise programs will have a greater effect on balance, functional performance, daily function, and pain on individuals with low back pain (LBP) after 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Specifically, the differences in dynamic balance, functional performance, pain intensity, and disability level will be compared between participants who receive spinal stabilization exercises program (SSE) and those who receive a general exercise program (GE) which includes range-of-motion (ROM) and flexibility exercises. The research hypotheses are:

  1. 1.The SSE program will significantly improve dynamic balance and functional performance in adult participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP at two and four weeks as well as after an eight-week follow-up after initiating intervention.
  2. 2.The SSE program will significantly improve pain intensity and disability level in adult participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP at two and four weeks as well as after an eight-week follow-up after initiating intervention.
  3. 3.In adult participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP, the group receiving the SSE program will demonstrate significantly improved dynamic balance, functional performance, pain intensity and disability levels compared to the placebo group receiving the GE program at two and four weeks as well as after an eight-week follow-up after initiating intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 25, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2018

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 11, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 11, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 2, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 2, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 30, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Y-balance testFunctional Movement ScreenSpinal stabilization exercisesDynamic balancePostural controlPhysical performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change on dynamic balance

    Dynamic balance measured by the Y-balance Test (YBT). Dynamic balance is quantified by measuring how far the reach indicator is placed relative to the stance platform while maintaining a unilateral stance. A farther reach distance is indicative of greater dynamic balance. To score each of the three directions, the reach distances (measured in cm) are averaged and normalized to the participant's leg length. As such, YBT scores are expressed as a percentage of leg length. Normalization is performed by dividing each reach distance by the participant's leg length and then multiplying by a hundred. Next, the composite score will be calculated by taking the average between right and left reach distances for all three directions and then summing the averages of the three reach directions. The score then will be divided by three times the average leg length and multiplied by 100.

    Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention.

  • Change on functional performance

    Functional performance measured by Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Each participant will perform all 7 components of the FMS tests including deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg-raise, trunk push-up, and trunk rotary stability tests. Participants will perform 3 trials for each of the 7 FMS tests, and the best score from the 3 trials will be recorded. In addition, each participant will perform 3 clearance screens. These 3 clearance screens evaluate pain and are graded as negative or positive. If a participant has no pain, the clearing test is considered negative. If there is an increase in pain, the clearing test is considered positive and the associated test will be scored zero. For movements that are scored on both limbs, the lower score will be used to compute the composite score. The total score of the 7 tests will be added together to get a composite score of the FMS.

    Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention.

  • Change on pain intensity level

    pain intensity as perceived by the participant measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS is an 11-point numerical scale (0-10), in which higher scores mean greater pain intensity. The possible scores on the NPRS range from zero representing no pain to 10 representing the worst imaginable pain. The NPRS will be administered verbally, and each participant will be asked to rate their pain intensity at present (i.e. current pain level).

    Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention.

  • Change on disability level

    Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) to determine participants perceived disability level due to low back pain. The OSW is a self-reported ordinal scale measure that consists of 10 items assessing different aspects of pain and function related to the patient's LBP. Each item is scored on a six-point scale (0 to 5), with five representing the highest level of disability. The scores of the 10 items are then summed, with a maximum possible sum of 50 points. To obtain a percentage score, the sum is multiplied by two. Participants will be asked to use the OSW to rate their perceived level of disability at present.

    Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Fear-avoidance beliefs

    at baseline and will be used for descriptive purposes only.

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    at baseline and will be used for descriptive purposes only.

Study Arms (2)

Spinal Stabilization Exercise Program

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the spinal stabilization exercise group will be instructed to perform four exercises in total, one exercise from each of the following four categories: (a) abdominal bracing, (b) quadruped, (c) prone plank, and (d) side plank exercises. Each exercise will be progressed and advanced in difficulty by increasing repetitions, hold times, and/or extremity movements. The progression of exercises will be based on the participants' performance at each supervised physical therapy session based on pre-established criteria by Hicks et al. (2005).

Other: Exercises

General Exercises Program

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants in the general exercise group will perform a range of motion (ROM) and flexibility exercises of low back and lower extremities. Each participant will be instructed to perform four exercises in total, one exercise from each of the following four categories: (a) knee to chest, (b) lower trunk rotation, (c) prone press-ups, and (d) hamstring stretch exercises. These exercises will be progressed by increasing repetitions and pain-free ROM.

Other: Exercises

Interventions

Participants in the treatment group will be instructed in the spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs), modeled after the spinal stabilization exercise program designed by Hicks et al. (2005). The SSE program targets muscle activation of spinal stabilizers specifically, the transversus abdominus and lumbar multifidus muscles. Each exercise will be progressed by increasing repetitions and hold time.

General Exercises ProgramSpinal Stabilization Exercise Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals between the age of 18 to 65 years
  • Individuals who have low back pain (LBP) for 6 weeks or more
  • ability to understand, speak, and follow verbal instructions in English
  • the average pain level of at least 2 out of 10 in the past week

You may not qualify if:

  • serious spinal conditions such as fracture, infection, or tumor
  • signs of nerve root compression
  • a history of lower extremity or lumbar spine surgery
  • a history of hip, knee, or ankle pain in the previous two years
  • current pregnancy
  • systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatologic or neurological disorders)
  • vestibular or other balance disorders
  • ongoing treatment for inner ear, sinus, or upper respiratory infection
  • concussion within the previous three months
  • a history of falls or fear of falling
  • a need for any form of walking aids (cane, walker)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Woman's UniversityT. Boone Pickens Institute of Health Sciences-Dallas Center

Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Yousef M Alshehre, MSc.

    Texas Woman's University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Khalid M Alkhathami, MPT

    Texas Woman's University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The primary investigator (PI) of this study, the outcomes assessor, will be blinded to participants' group assignment and will perform the eligibility screening and standard physical therapy examination for all participants. In addition, the PI will perform the pre- and post-intervention measurements of dynamic balance using the Y- balance test, functional performance using Functional Movement Screen, pain scores using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and disability levels using the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Investigator #2, the care provider, will be blinded to the outcomes measurements and will be responsible for group allocation and administering the intervention, either a spinal stabilization exercises program or a general exercises program, to participants in both groups. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups and will be blinded to the other group exercise program.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study will be a randomized clinical trial (RCT) using a prospective two-way (2 Ă— 4) mixed-design to examine the effectiveness of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on dynamic balance, functional performance, pain intensity, and disability level in adults with sub-acute and chronic low back pain (LBP). The two independent variables are group, which is a between-subject factor, and time which is a within-subject factor. The independent variable of group has two levels: (1) the treatment group which will receive SSEs, and (2) the placebo group which will receive general range of motion and flexibility exercises. The independent variable of time has four levels: pre-intervention at baseline, and two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks after intervention. The four dependent variables are (1) dynamic balance, (2) functional performance, (3) pain intensity, and (4) disability level.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2018

First Posted

July 24, 2018

Study Start

June 25, 2018

Primary Completion

November 11, 2018

Study Completion

November 11, 2018

Last Updated

January 2, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations