NCT03594565

Brief Summary

Background Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder that presents a significant set of challenges to the patient, their family and the physician. Near normoglycemia is associated with a reduced risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus but is difficult to achieve despite considerable effort from patients and healthcare providers . Furthermore, episodes of hypoglycemia are frequent and may endanger life acutely. Subcutaneous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS), also called sensors that continuously measure interstitial fluid glucose levels have become available recently, and approved for use in children. CGMS has made it possible to assess the patterns and trends of blood glucose and the substantial variability in glucose excursions in the population of type 1 diabetes, and to prevent severe hypoglycemic episodes. The benefits of this technology are most apparent with near continuous wear of the sensors and is incorporated into the day to day management of the individual's diabetes . These devices provide patients with information regarding postprandial and overnight glucose profiles that are rarely, if ever, obtained with conventional self monitoring of blood glucose using home glucose meters . Skin reactions CGM systems measure the glucose content of interstitial fluid , using an electrochemical enzymatic sensor, which is accessed by a needle sensor inserted subcutaneously. The CGMS is compromised of a disposable subcutaneous glucose-sensing catheter connected by a cable to a pager sized glucose monitor . Problems related associated to skin irritation and sensor adhesiveness in these young children presents challenges to daily use of the CGMS. In the study conducted by Englert et al, for the Diabetes Research in Children (Directnet) Study Group - three primary factors that contributed to reduced CGM use were identified: the limited body surface area in smaller children, ambient temperature and humidity, as well as the type and duration of physical activity. A study conducted in Israel, by our group, demonstrated only 30% consistant use of the system, partly due to skin reactions . In our cohort, thirty participants of the CGMS group (36.1 %) had signs of local reaction to the RT-CGMS insertion. Mild-to severe local redness was reported in 19 % of patients and hyperpigmentation in 17 %. Skin reactions were among the reasons for discontinuation of CGMS (2/51 participants, 3.9 %). The use of Local Fluticasone for dermatological use Fluticasone propionate - the first carbothioate corticosteroid - has been classified as a potent anti-inflammatory drug for dermatological use. It is available as cream and ointment formulations for the acute and maintenance treatment of patients with dermatological disorders such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and vitiligo. This glucocorticoid is characterized by high lipophilicity, high glucocorticoid receptor binding and activation, and a rapid metabolic turnover in skin. Several clinical trials demonstrate a low potential for cutaneous and systemic side-effects . Even among paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis, fluticasone propionate proved to be safe and effective. These pharmacological and clinical properties are reflected by the high therapeutic index of this glucocorticoid. The same drug is also available as a nasal spray ,for cases of allergic rhinitis. The use of fluticasone in spray, sprayed on the location of CGMS insertion, prior to insertion to prevent adverse skin reactions in patients with type 1 DM using CGMS devices has not been addressed in the literature. Hypothesis : Minimizing skin irritation may significantly improve duration of use and tolerability of CGM devices by young children, as well a in young adults. The Investigators assumed that the simple use of a spray, which will not decrease the adhesiveness of the sensor, may improve use . Methods Children whose parents had difficulty with CGMS due to irritation, redness were offered to use Flixonase (FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE), with an approval form 29ג, indicating it is not approved for this specific diagnosis . The investigators followed those patients for improvement and possible local side effects. Study population Every patient, treated by the pediatric and adolescents diabetes mellitus interdisciplinary service , Assaf Haroffe Medical Center , who experienced local reaction at the site of CGMS was offered this medical option . Charts were reviewed for response . total participants - 15

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2018

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in skin irritation before and after regular application of nsFP according to the modified Draize scale.

    Erythema and edema were assessed for adhesive and sensor-insertion areas on a 4-point scale, with total score ≤3 defined as mild, 4-5 as moderate, and 6-8 as severe.

    2 years from patient first enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in BMI SDS

    6 months after nsFP use

  • Change in height SDS 6 months after nsFP use

    6 months after nsFP use.

  • Change in mean glucose 6 months after nsFP use

    6 months after nsFP use.

  • Change in glycated hemoglobin 6 months after nsFP use

    6 months after nsFP use.

Study Arms (1)

Local steroids prior to CGMS insertion

EXPERIMENTAL

topical spraying of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (nsFP) on the skin area of CGMS placement prior to sensor insertion in a group of pediatric T1D patients who had mild to severe local skin reactions to CGMS adhesives. Dosage: 2 puffs.

Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

Interventions

Local Fluticasone Propionate use prior to continuous glucose monitoring system insertion

Local steroids prior to CGMS insertion

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 1-20 years
  • Local skin reaction to CGMS indicating local or systemic management.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who were offered nsFP but did not actually use it.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypersensitivity

Interventions

Fluticasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Pediatric Endocrinology Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2018

First Posted

July 20, 2018

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2018

Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08