Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Twice a Day (BID) Using a Novel Bi Directional Device in Subjects With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis Followed by an 8-Week Open-Label Extension Phase to Assess Safety
A 16-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Twice a Day (BID) Using a Novel Bi Directional Device in Subjects With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis Followed by an 8-Week Open-Label Extension Phase to Assess Safety
1 other identifier
interventional
323
2 countries
33
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of fluticasone propionate twice a day delivered by the OptiNose device with placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis. Two co-primary endpoints will be used in the study: reduction of nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms at the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase measured by the 7 day average instantaneous AM diary symptom scores, and reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2013
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 6, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2018
CompletedDecember 26, 2018
November 1, 2017
1.7 years
June 13, 2012
October 17, 2017
December 4, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 4 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change in Total Polyp Grade
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. A summary of the changes from baseline to Week 16 in total polyp grade. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) at Week 16 of double-blind treatment phase; Included patients with nasal polyps at baseline
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Congestion/Obstruction Scores (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
OPN-375 100 μg BID
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 100 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORDouble-Blind Treatment Phase: Matching Placebo BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks
OPN-375 200 μg BID
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 200 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks
OPN-375 400 μg BID
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks
Interventions
Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women aged 18 years and older
- Women must
- be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg,prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel\], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or
- be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation at least 1 year before screening) or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, or
- be postmenopausal (spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 1 year).
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) or urine pregnancy test (depending on local regulations) at the screening visit
- Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 1 to 3 in each of the nasal cavities as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at both screening and baseline visits
- Must have at least moderate symptoms of nasal congestion/obstruction as reported by the subject for the 7 day period preceding the screening visit
- At the baseline visit (Day 1), must have a morning score of at least 2 (moderate) on nasal congestion/obstruction recorded on the subject diary for at least 5 of the last 7 days of the 7 to up to 14 day run-in period
- Must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization
- Subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before the screening visit. Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before screening with plans to continue use throughout the study.
- Must be able to cease treatment with intranasal medications including, but not limited to, intranasal steroids, intranasal sodium cromolyn, nasal atropine, nasal ipratropium bromide, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for comorbid asthma and COPD) at the screening visit
- Must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at the screening visit
- Must be able to use the OptiNose device correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use of the placebo device at screening, Visit 1.
- Must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant or lactating
- Have complete or near-complete obstruction of the nasal cavities
- Inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow for any reason including nasal septum deviation
- Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason including nasal septum deviation
- Nasal septum perforation
- Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before the screening visit
- Have evidence of significant baseline mucosal injury, ulceration or erosion (eg, exposed cartilage, perforation) on baseline nasal examination/nasal endoscopy
- History of more than 5 sinonasal surgeries for either nasal polyps or nasal/sinus inflammation (lifetime)
- History of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before the screening visit
- History of any surgical procedure that prevents the ability to accurately grade polyps
- Have symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis at screening or baseline and/or, based on time of year, would anticipate onset of symptoms within 4 weeks of randomization
- Current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis)
- Have significant oral structural abnormalities, eg, a cleft palate
- Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
- History of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Optinose US Inc.lead
Study Sites (33)
SC Clinical Research, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, 85704, United States
Kern Allergy and Medical Research, Inc.
Bakersfield, California, 93301, United States
Central California Clinical Research
Fresno, California, 93720, United States
Allergy & Asthma Specialists Medical Group
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
California Allergy & Asthma Medical Group, Inc.
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
Choc PSF, AMC, Division of AA & I
Orange, California, 92868, United States
California Allergy and Asthma Palmdale
Palmdale, California, 93551, United States
Peninsula Research Associates, Inc.
Rolling Hills Estates, California, 90274, United States
California Medical Clinic for Headache
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Asthma & Allergy Associates, P.C.
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States
Colorado ENT & Allergy
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States
Colorado Allergy and Asthma Centers, P.C.
Denver, Colorado, 80230, United States
University of South Florida Asthma, Allergy & Immunology
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
NU Feinberg School of Medicine Depart. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Chicago ENT
Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States
Northeast Medical Research Associates, Inc
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747, United States
The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, P.C.
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, United States
Clinical Research Group of Montana, PLLC
Bozeman, Montana, 59718, United States
Coastal Ear, Nose and Throat, LLC
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Optimed Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43235, United States
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Research Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
National Allergy, Asthma & Urticaria Centers of Charleston, P.A.
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29420, United States
AARA Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Ear Nose and Throat Associates of Texas
Frisco, Texas, 43235, United States
ENTTEX
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
EVMS Depart. Of Otolaryngology
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C.
Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53228, United States
Ottawa Allergy Research Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2, Canada
CHUM Hôtel-Dieu
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8, Canada
Dr. Jaime Del Carpio
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1L5, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Ow RA, McGinnis JP 2nd, Sacks HJ, Mehle ME. The Effect of EDS-FLU on Objective and Patient-Reported Subjective Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Ear Nose Throat J. 2025 Feb;104(2):93-101. doi: 10.1177/01455613221088698. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
PMID: 35437059DERIVEDSkoner DP, Meltzer EO, Skoner J, Sacks HJ, Lumry WR. Evaluation of the ocular safety associated with the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022 Jan 9;43(1):70-77. doi: 10.2500/aap.2022.43.210096. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
PMID: 34753535DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President Global Clinical Operations & Outsourcing
- Organization
- OptiNose
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2012
First Posted
June 19, 2012
Study Start
November 19, 2013
Primary Completion
August 6, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 26, 2018
Results First Posted
December 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-11