NCT01622569

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of fluticasone propionate twice a day delivered by the OptiNose device with placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis. Two co-primary endpoints will be used in the study: reduction of nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms at the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase measured by the 7 day average instantaneous AM diary symptom scores, and reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
323

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Geographic Reach
2 countries

33 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 13, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 19, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 6, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 5, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 26, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 13, 2012

Results QC Date

October 17, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms

    Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 4 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase

    Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase

  • Change in Total Polyp Grade

    Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. A summary of the changes from baseline to Week 16 in total polyp grade. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) at Week 16 of double-blind treatment phase; Included patients with nasal polyps at baseline

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Congestion/Obstruction Scores (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

  • Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

  • Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

  • Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase

  • Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score

    Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

OPN-375 100 μg BID

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Double-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 100 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks

Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Double-Blind Treatment Phase: Matching Placebo BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks

Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

OPN-375 200 μg BID

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Double-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 200 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks

Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

OPN-375 400 μg BID

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Double-Blind Treatment Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 16 weeks Open-Label Extension Phase: OPN-375 400 μg BID x 8 weeks

Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

Interventions

Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System

Also known as: OPN-375
OPN-375 100 μg BIDOPN-375 200 μg BIDOPN-375 400 μg BIDPlacebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men or women aged 18 years and older
  • Women must
  • be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg,prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel\], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or
  • be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation at least 1 year before screening) or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, or
  • be postmenopausal (spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 1 year).
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) or urine pregnancy test (depending on local regulations) at the screening visit
  • Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 1 to 3 in each of the nasal cavities as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at both screening and baseline visits
  • Must have at least moderate symptoms of nasal congestion/obstruction as reported by the subject for the 7 day period preceding the screening visit
  • At the baseline visit (Day 1), must have a morning score of at least 2 (moderate) on nasal congestion/obstruction recorded on the subject diary for at least 5 of the last 7 days of the 7 to up to 14 day run-in period
  • Must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization
  • Subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before the screening visit. Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before screening with plans to continue use throughout the study.
  • Must be able to cease treatment with intranasal medications including, but not limited to, intranasal steroids, intranasal sodium cromolyn, nasal atropine, nasal ipratropium bromide, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for comorbid asthma and COPD) at the screening visit
  • Must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at the screening visit
  • Must be able to use the OptiNose device correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use of the placebo device at screening, Visit 1.
  • Must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Have complete or near-complete obstruction of the nasal cavities
  • Inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow for any reason including nasal septum deviation
  • Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason including nasal septum deviation
  • Nasal septum perforation
  • Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before the screening visit
  • Have evidence of significant baseline mucosal injury, ulceration or erosion (eg, exposed cartilage, perforation) on baseline nasal examination/nasal endoscopy
  • History of more than 5 sinonasal surgeries for either nasal polyps or nasal/sinus inflammation (lifetime)
  • History of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before the screening visit
  • History of any surgical procedure that prevents the ability to accurately grade polyps
  • Have symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis at screening or baseline and/or, based on time of year, would anticipate onset of symptoms within 4 weeks of randomization
  • Current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis)
  • Have significant oral structural abnormalities, eg, a cleft palate
  • Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
  • History of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
  • +14 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (33)

SC Clinical Research, Inc.

Tucson, Arizona, 85704, United States

Location

Kern Allergy and Medical Research, Inc.

Bakersfield, California, 93301, United States

Location

Central California Clinical Research

Fresno, California, 93720, United States

Location

Allergy & Asthma Specialists Medical Group

Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States

Location

California Allergy & Asthma Medical Group, Inc.

Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States

Location

Choc PSF, AMC, Division of AA & I

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

California Allergy and Asthma Palmdale

Palmdale, California, 93551, United States

Location

Peninsula Research Associates, Inc.

Rolling Hills Estates, California, 90274, United States

Location

California Medical Clinic for Headache

Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States

Location

Asthma & Allergy Associates, P.C.

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States

Location

Colorado ENT & Allergy

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States

Location

Colorado Allergy and Asthma Centers, P.C.

Denver, Colorado, 80230, United States

Location

University of South Florida Asthma, Allergy & Immunology

Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States

Location

NU Feinberg School of Medicine Depart. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Chicago ENT

Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States

Location

Northeast Medical Research Associates, Inc

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747, United States

Location

The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, P.C.

Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, United States

Location

Clinical Research Group of Montana, PLLC

Bozeman, Montana, 59718, United States

Location

Coastal Ear, Nose and Throat, LLC

Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States

Location

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Optimed Research

Columbus, Ohio, 43235, United States

Location

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Research Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States

Location

Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute

Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States

Location

National Allergy, Asthma & Urticaria Centers of Charleston, P.A.

North Charleston, South Carolina, 29420, United States

Location

AARA Research Center

Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States

Location

Ear Nose and Throat Associates of Texas

Frisco, Texas, 43235, United States

Location

ENTTEX

Plano, Texas, 75093, United States

Location

EVMS Depart. Of Otolaryngology

Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States

Location

Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C.

Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53228, United States

Location

Ottawa Allergy Research Corporation

Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2, Canada

Location

CHUM Hôtel-Dieu

Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8, Canada

Location

Dr. Jaime Del Carpio

Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1L5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Ow RA, McGinnis JP 2nd, Sacks HJ, Mehle ME. The Effect of EDS-FLU on Objective and Patient-Reported Subjective Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Ear Nose Throat J. 2025 Feb;104(2):93-101. doi: 10.1177/01455613221088698. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

  • Skoner DP, Meltzer EO, Skoner J, Sacks HJ, Lumry WR. Evaluation of the ocular safety associated with the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022 Jan 9;43(1):70-77. doi: 10.2500/aap.2022.43.210096. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Fluticasone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President Global Clinical Operations & Outsourcing
Organization
OptiNose

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2012

First Posted

June 19, 2012

Study Start

November 19, 2013

Primary Completion

August 6, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 26, 2018

Results First Posted

December 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-11

Locations