Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Multifocal Lens
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized,comparative study. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Bifocal Intraocular Lenses
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 13, 2018
May 1, 2018
5 months
June 15, 2018
July 2, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Uncorrected distance visual acuity
Uncorrected distance visual acuity (4m) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
3 months after surgery
Uncorrected near visual acuity
Uncorrected near visual acuity (40cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
3 months after surgery
Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity
Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (60cm) were measured using the reading table model of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS; Vector Vision, Ltd, Greenville, OH, USA).
3 months after surgery
Other Outcomes (1)
Quality of vision
3 months after surgery
Study Arms (4)
trifocal lens
trifocal lens implantation(AT Lisa tri 839MP)
bifocal lens 1
bifocal lens implantation(Diff-aay)
bifocal lens 2
bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +3.0D)
bifocal lens 3
bifocal lens implantation(ReSTOR +2.5D)
Interventions
phacoemusification + trifocal lens(AT Lisa tri 839MP) implantation
phacoemusification +bifocal lens(Diff-aay) implantation
phacoemusification +bifocal lens (ReSTOR +3.0D) implantation
phacoemusification +bifocal lens (ReSTOR +2.5D) implantation
Eligibility Criteria
cataract patients
You may qualify if:
- cataract
You may not qualify if:
- existence of any corneal disease;
- previous eye surgery;
- illiteracy;
- previous refractive surgery;
- expected postoperative corneal astigmatism more than 1.00D;
- higer-order aberration more than 0.3;
- spherical aberration more than 0.3μm;
- intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wensheng Li
Shanghai, 200000, China
Related Publications (3)
de Medeiros AL, de Araujo Rolim AG, Motta AFP, Ventura BV, Vilar C, Chaves MAPD, Carricondo PC, Hida WT. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 26;11:1911-1916. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S145945. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29138533BACKGROUNDGundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 17;10:455-61. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S103375. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27051269BACKGROUNDXu Z, Cao D, Chen X, Wu S, Wang X, Wu Q. Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186522. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29073156BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wensheng Li
Shanghai Aier Eye Hosptial
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2018
First Posted
July 13, 2018
Study Start
August 2, 2018
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After this study is finished the data will become available for 1year.
- Access Criteria
- The analytical data will be accessed in published articles.
all IPD that underlie results