Study Stopped
Pilot data suggested the paradigm would need significant revision.
Pilot data suggested the paradigm would need significant revision.
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
0
1 country
1
Study Start
July 16, 2018
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)The ability to change walking patterns is important for daily tasks such as stepping over an obstacle. This change of walking pattern can occur in a strategic manner, i.e., consciously making one step longer or shorter. Healthy individuals can learn a new walking pattern through perturbed visual feedback of their walking information (Kim et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2017). This type of learning is thought to largely involve explicit strategy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can enhance learning of some motor tasks (Reis et al., 2009), and primarily has been studied in the upper extremity. In locomotor learning, prior recent work by the investigators has suggested that tDCS does not affect non-strategy based locomotor learning, and the investigators speculate that tDCS may benefit learning of strategic tasks instead. The purpose of this study is to determine if tDCS can enhance learning and retention of a new walking pattern in a strategy-based, visually guided locomotor task in healthy individuals. Two groups of young, healthy participants will be recruited to learn a new walking pattern through perturbed visual feedback, with retention of learning tested on the second day. One group will receive tDCS, which is expected to enhance learning. The other group will receive placebo stimulation and serve as a control. Results from this work will provide information on which type of motor learning is sensitive to enhancement with tDCS, and may help pave the path for utilizing tDCS for neurorehabilitation.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
June 14, 2018
Actual (reported)July 11, 2018
Actual (reported)July 16, 2018
Actual (reported)April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Magnitude of Locomotor Learning
Step length produced on the perturbed leg at the end of the learning period on study day 1 and subtracted from baseline (pre-learning period) step length
study day 1
Magnitude of Locomotor Learning Retention
Step length produced on the perturbed leg on study day 2, normalized to the Magnitude of Locomotor Learning achieved on study day 1
study day 2
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered via saline-soaked sponge electrodes (anode, 8 cm\^2; cathode 38.4 cm\^2) at an intensity of 1.5 milliamperes over \< 30 minutes.
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered via saline-soaked sponge electrodes (anode, 8 cm\^2; cathode 38.4 cm\^2) at an intensity of 1.5 milliamperes over 2 minutes.
real or sham tDCS delivered to primary motor cortex
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
University of Delaware
Newark, Delaware, 19713, United States
Susanne M Morton, PhD, PT
University of Delaware
0 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
June 14, 2018
First Posted
July 11, 2018
Study Start
July 16, 2018
Actual (reported)Modulating Human Cortical Plasticity With Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: