Different Types of Suture for Sacral Colpopexy
Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Suture in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled study is designed to test absorbable suture compared to non absorbable suture in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity, rate of recurrence, subjective satisfaction of the patient and rate of mesh erosion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2020
CompletedMarch 31, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.6 years
June 6, 2018
March 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with anatomical correction of the prolapse
Anatomical correction of the prolapse evaluated by gynecological visit
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
rate mesh erosion
1 year
long term outcomes
1 year
Rate of recurrence
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Absorbable suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORlaparoscopic sacral colpopexy with absorbable suture
Non absorbable suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORlaparoscopic sacral colpopexy with non absorbable suture
Interventions
laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse with anterior and posterior meshes with absorbable suture
laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse with anterior and posterior meshes with non absorbable suture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who required surgical treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse stage ≥ 2 with or without stress urinary incontinence
You may not qualify if:
- Age \> 75 years
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heartlead
- Miulli General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
ospedale regionale Miulli
Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, 70021, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2018
First Posted
July 11, 2018
Study Start
July 10, 2018
Primary Completion
February 10, 2020
Study Completion
February 10, 2020
Last Updated
March 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03