Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
1 other identifier
interventional
312
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse(POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on woman's quality of life. Transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our preliminary trial showed that the use of self-tailored mesh had good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. The trial is designed to compare self-tailored titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with mesh-kit in the treatment of POP stage III-IV in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effective .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 12, 2022
CompletedMarch 5, 2019
February 1, 2019
2 years
May 7, 2017
March 4, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
surgical "success"
Subjects will be considered a success if they meet the definitions of anatomic cure and deny vaginal bulging symptoms, and no additional treatment for prolapse(surgical or pessary use). Anatomic cure is defined as leading edge above the hymen (i.e Ba, C, Bp\<0 cm) Symptomatic cure is defined as the absence of vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by a negative response question 3 of the pelvic floor distress inventory- 20 (PFDI-20): "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?
up to 36 months after operation
Secondary Outcomes (8)
anatomic outcomes
up to 36 months after operation
symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PFIQ-7)
up to 36 months after operation
symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PFDI-20)
up to 36 months after operation
symptomatic improvement using validated instruments(PISQ-12)
up to 36 months after operation
symptomatic improvement using patient global impression of change (PGI-C)
up to 36 months after operation
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
self-cut mesh procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis procedure is transvaginal mesh implantation surgery for POP patients. Self-cut mesh procedure is an economic pelvic reconstructive surgical operation with use of specially designed puncture needles and self-cut mesh, which mainly provide anterior and apical compartments support, with posterior compartment reinforced by bridge technique repair. The mesh pieces used in this surgery was cut from a single piece of mesh material(TiLOOP 10\*15cm) which is much cheaper and readily available. Patients could have transvaginal hysterectomy concomitantly.
mesh-kit procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis procedure is transvaginal mesh implantation surgery for POP patients.Mesh-kit procedure is refered to pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with titanium-coated meshes kit(TiLOOP TOTAL6).Patients could have transvaginal hysterectomy concomitantly.
Interventions
transvaginal mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age:More than 50 years old with 3 years after menopause or more than 55 years old, but less than 75 years old.
- Subject must have severe apical or anterior vaginal prolapse (stage III-IV), with moderate posterior vaginal prolapse(stage I-II). This is defined as ( C \> +1cm OR Ba \> +1cm, with Bp ≤+1cm by the POP-Q). This is the most common modality of multiple compartment POP in clinic.
- Subject reports a bothersome bulge they can see or feel per PFDI-20, question 3, response of 2 or higher (i.e., responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit").
- Desires transvaginal mesh treatment for primary or recurrent, symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse.
- Concomitant hysterectomy when indicated. But concomitant anti-incontinence surgeries will not be enrolled.
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant in the future
- Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) or tissue necrosis
- Subject has history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, colo-rectal or cervical)
- Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area
- Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months)
- Subject has systemic connective tissue disease (e.g. scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Marfan syndrome, Ehlers Danlos, collagenosis, polymyositis, polymyalgia rheumatica)
- Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis
- Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)
- Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or stroke with residual neurologic deficit)
- Subject has had previous prolapse repair with mesh in the target compartment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospitallead
- Shanghai Medstron Medical Co.Ltdcollaborator
- LinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.collaborator
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (11)
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Fosha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Foshan, Guangdong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Changsha, Hunan, China
The second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
Related Publications (2)
Chen J, Yu J, Morse A, Tao G, Gong J, Wang B, Wang Y, Ababaikeli G, Jiang X, Liu P, Zhang X, Nisier H, Wang P, Funfgeld C, Huang K, Zhang H, Sun X, Zhu L. Effectiveness of Self-cut vs Mesh-Kit Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh for Transvaginal Treatment of Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31869.
PMID: 36112377DERIVEDChen J, Yu J, Morse A, Funfgeld C, Huang K, Gong J, Tao G, Wang B, Wang Y, Jiang X, Ababaikeli G, Liu P, Nisier H, Zhang X, Wang P, Sun X, Zhu L. Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 26;21(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3966-3.
PMID: 32102687DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lan Zhu
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- participant and investigator are not blinded. outcome assessor who are in charge of follow-up assement is masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2017
First Posted
September 14, 2017
Study Start
January 12, 2018
Primary Completion
January 12, 2020
Study Completion
January 12, 2022
Last Updated
March 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share