Training With Elastic Tubing in Cardiopaths: Clinical Trial
The Short-term Effects of a Resistive Training Program Using Elastic Tubing in Cardiac Patients: Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
13
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Resistance training is effective in cardiac rehabilitation; however, other types of training, such as elastic tubing, are rarely used and may present good therapeutic alternatives. Due to its practicality and cost effectiveness, training using elastic tubing may become an important tool in cardiovascular rehabilitation. Objective: To evaluate muscular strength, functional capacity, aerobic capacity and quality of life in patients with cardiovascular diseases in phase II of rehabilitation, after resistance training with elastic tubing. Methods: patients with cardiovascular diseases performed training with elastic tubing for six weeks, twice a week and the load was progressively increased every 15 days. The following muscle groups were evaluated and trained: shoulder abductors and flexors, elbow flexors, and knee flexors and extensors. Muscular strength was evaluated using a dynamometer; functional capacity with a 6-minute walk test and ergospirometric test; and quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro Wilk test. Comparisons before and after training were performed using the paired Student's t test or the Wilcoxon test (p \<5%).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2018
CompletedJuly 9, 2018
June 1, 2018
4 months
June 14, 2018
July 6, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline Muscular Strength at 6 weeks
The evaluation of muscular strength was performed at the start of the intervention protocol and after 6 weeks, using a digital force gauge, brand Force Gauge®, model FG-100kg - United States, and all results were expressed in Newtons (N). The evaluation was performed with the dominant member of each patient, using a steel cord coated with rigid plastic attached to a dynamometer, with one end attached to a fixed bar and the other end to the distal portion of the dominant member of the patient
The evaluation of muscular strength was performed at the start of the intervention protocol and after 6 weeks.
Change from baseline Functional Capacity at 6 weeks
The evaluation of functional capacity was carried out through the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The 6MWT followed the criteria established by the American Thoracic Society15. The test was performed in a gym hall at Oeste Paulista University, Presidente Prudente/SP-Brazil, and was repeated twice with an interval of 30 minutes between attempts and the highest value was taken into account, during the test Standardized verbal performance incentives were given every minute. During the 6MWT was measured blood pressure, oximetry, perception subjective of effort, heart and respiratory rate.
was performed at the start of the intervention protocol and after 6 weeks
Change from baseline Evaluation of maximal aerobic capacity at 6 weeks
The patients underwent a cardiopulmonary test performed by a cardiologist. All tests were performed on a treadmill (Inbrasport ATL 2000). The modified Bruce protocol16 was used and the test performed until voluntary exhaustion. No patient presented alterations in the electrocardiogram that prevented the realization and completion of the test. Cardiovascular parameters were monitored continuously: heart rate through the Polar S810i, Finland, arterial oxygen saturation using the Mindray PM 50 pulse oximeter, Brazil, and the subjective perception of effort.17 The ventilatory variables were obtained through the VO2000 gas analyzer (Medical Graphics, USA) calibrated before each test according to the manufacturer's instructions. The average air flow was used in all tests and obtained every 10 seconds, Aerograph®, Michigan, USA.
was performed at the start of the intervention protocol and after 6 weeks
Change from baseline Evaluation of quality of life at 6 weeks
The quality of life of these patients was assessed using the generic quality of life evaluation questionnaire SF-36, validated in Brazil, which has eight dimensions that are scored from 0 to 100. For each dimension, values greater than 50 are positive in relation to a good perception of quality of life
was performed at the start of the intervention protocol and after 6 weeks
Study Arms (1)
elastic tube group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
performed training with elastic tubing for six weeks, twice a week and the load was progressively increased every 15 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of both sexes
- Aged between 45-79 years
- Clinical diagnosis of heart disease (coronary artery disease, postoperative myocardial revascularization, acute myocardial infarction)
- In phase II of CRP for at least three months
You may not qualify if:
- Patients hemodynamically unstable
- Patients with changes in medication for a minimum of 30 days
- Patients who presented arteriopathies, neurological, muscular or orthopedic disorders, such as rheumatism and unstable heart disease that could be detected by electrocardiogram, and lung diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2018
First Posted
July 9, 2018
Study Start
March 5, 2016
Primary Completion
June 20, 2016
Study Completion
July 30, 2016
Last Updated
July 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06